Biomedical Microdevices

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 231–237

Size-based microfluidic enrichment of neonatal rat cardiac cell populations

  • Shashi K. Murthy
  • Palaniappan Sethu
  • Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
  • Mehmet Toner
  • Milica Radisic
Article

Abstract

Native heart consists of myocytes and non-myocytes. We demonstrate here the feasibility of a size-based microfluidic separation of myocytes and non-myocytes from the neonatal rat myocardium. The device consists of a middle channel (50 μm wide, 200 μm tall, and 4 cm long) connected to adjacent side channels by microsieves (80 μm wide, 5 μm tall and 40 μm in length). The side channels increase in width in a flared shape along the length of the device to ensure constant pressure gradient across all sieves. In the first step, non-myoctes were removed from the myocytes by a conventional pre-plating method for 75 min. Subsequently, the non-myocytes were further enriched in a microfludic device at 20 μl/min. We demonstrated that the cells in the middle and side channels maintained viability during sorting and the ability to attach and grow in culture. Upon culture for 48 h cardiomyocytes from the reservoir (control) and middle channel stained positive for cardiac Troponin I, exhibited a well developed contractile apparatus and contracted spontaneously and in response to electrical field stimulation. Most of the cells in the side channel expressed a non-myocyte marker vimetin. Fluorescent activated cell sorting indicated significant enrichment in the side channel (p < 0.001) for non-myocytes. Original cell suspension had a bimodal cell size distribution with the peaks in the range from 7–9 μm and 15–17 μm. Upon cell sorting the distribution was Gaussian in both side channel and middle channel with the peaks in the range 7–9 μm and 9–11 μm respectively, indicating that the separation by size occurred.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B.S. Burlew and K.T. Weber Herz, 27, 92 (Mar, 2002).Google Scholar
  2. R.L. Carrier, M. Papadaki, M. Rupnick, F.J. Schoen, N. Bursac, R. Langer, L.E. Freed, and G. Vunjak-Novakovic, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 64, 580 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. R.L. Carrier, M. Rupnick, R. Langer, F.J. Schoen, L.E. Freed, and G. Vunjak-Novakovic, Tissue Engineering 8, 175 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. R.L. Carrier, M. Rupnick, R. Langer, F.J. Schoen, L.E. Freed, and G. Vunjak-Novakovic, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 78, 617 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. B.S. Cho, T.G. Schuster, X.Y. Zhu, D. Chang, G.D. Smith, and S. Takayama, Analytical Chemistry, 75, 1671 (Apr 1, 2003).Google Scholar
  6. G. Gaudesius, M. Miragoli, S.P. Thomas, and S. Rohr, Circulation Research 93, 421 (Sep 5, 2003).Google Scholar
  7. L.R. Huang, E.C. Cox, R.H. Austin, and J.C. Sturm, Science 304, 987 (May 14, 2004).Google Scholar
  8. G. Kretzmer and K. Schugerl, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 34, 613 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. K.L. Laugwitz, A. Moretti, J. Lam, P. Gruber, Y. Chen, S. Woodard, L.Z. Lin, C.L. Cai, M.M. Lu, M. Reth, O. Platoshyn, J.X. Yuan, S. Evans, and K.R. Chien, Nature 433, 647 (Feb 10, 2005).Google Scholar
  10. S.K. Murthy, A. Sin, R.G. Tompkins, and M. Toner, Langmuir 20, 11649 (Dec 21, 2004).Google Scholar
  11. A.C. Nag, Cytobios 28, 41 (1980).Google Scholar
  12. J.R. Parratt, A.Vegh, I.J. Zeitlin, M. Ahmad, K. Oldroyd, K. Kaszala, and J.G. Papp, American Journal of Cardiology 80, 124A (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Radisic, R.K. Iyer, and S.K. Murthy, International Journal of Nanomedicine, 1, 3 (2006).Google Scholar
  14. M. Radisic, H. Park, H. Shing, T. Consi, F.J. Schoen, R. Langer, L.E. Freed, and G. Vunjak-Novakovic, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 18129 (Dec 28, 2004).Google Scholar
  15. M. Radisic, L. Yang, J. Boublik, R.J. Cohen, R. Langer, L.E. Freed, and G. Vunjak-Novakovic, American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology 286, H507 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Sethu, A. Sin, and M. Toner, Lab on a Chip 6, 83, (2006).Google Scholar
  17. A.M. Shah, A. Mebazaa, Z.K. Yang, G. Cuda, E.B. Lankford, C.B. Pepper, S.J. Sollott, J.R. Sellers, J.L. Robotham, and E.G. Lakatta, Circulation Research 80, 688 (1997).Google Scholar
  18. S.S. Shevkoplyas, T. Yoshida, L.L. Munn, and M.W. Bitensky, Analytical Chemistry 77, 933 (Feb 1, 2005).Google Scholar
  19. C.G. Smith, P.F. Greenfield, and D. Randerson, in Modern approaches to animal cell technology R.E. Spier, J.B. Griffith, Eds. (Butterworth, Kent, UK, 1987).Google Scholar
  20. N.A. Stathopoulos and J.D. Hellums, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 27, 1021 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. M.A. Sussman, A. McCulloch, and T.K. Borg, Circulation Research 91, 888 (Nov 15, 2002).Google Scholar
  22. J.X. Wang, J. Fan, F. Cheung, C. Laschinger, A. Seth, and C. McCulloch, Faseb Journal 18, C39 (May 14, 2004).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shashi K. Murthy
    • 1
    • 4
  • Palaniappan Sethu
    • 1
  • Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
    • 2
    • 5
  • Mehmet Toner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Milica Radisic
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Surgical Services and Center for Engineering in Medicine, Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical School; and Shriners Hospital for ChildrenBostonUSA
  2. 2.Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and TechnologyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering; Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied ChemistryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of Chemical EngineeringNortheastern UniversityUSA
  5. 5.Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations