Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, 35:2 | Cite as

Horizontal persistence and the complexity hypothesis

  • Aaron NovickEmail author
  • W. Ford Doolittle
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates the complexity hypothesis in microbial evolutionary genetics from a philosophical vantage. This hypothesis, in its current version, states that genes with high connectivity (more functional connections to other genes) are likely to be resistant to being horizontally transferred. We defend four claims. (1) There is an important distinction between two different ways in which a gene family can persist: vertically and horizontally. There is a trade-off between these two modes of persistence, such that a gene better at achieving one will be worse at achieving the other. (2) At least some genes are likely to experience selection favoring increased transferability. One consequence of this can be encapsulated as the “simplicity hypothesis”: horizontally persisting genes will experience selection favoring reduced connectivity. (3) In order to make sense of the simplicity hypothesis, we need to consider evolutionary populations that transcend species boundaries. Vertical and horizontal persistence are therefore not two competing ways of succeeding at the same game, but involve playing two different games altogether. (4) The complexity hypothesis can be understood in terms of two related notions: entrenchment and Cuvierian functionalism. This framing reveals previously unrecognized and philosophically interesting connections between reasoning about deep conservation and horizontal transfer.

Keywords

Horizontal gene transfer Multilevel selection Complexity hypothesis Generative entrenchment Cuvierian functionalism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Bill Wimsatt, Joe Bielawski, Fabien Denis-Cayer, Maureen O’Malley, and two anonymous referees for Biology and Philosophy for comments on the manuscript, as well as Jeremy Wideman and Chris Jones for helpful discussion. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Grant Number GLDSU/447989.

References

  1. Ambler RP, Meyer TE, Kamen MD (1979) Anomalies in amino acid sequences of small cytochromes c and cytochromes c′ from two species of purple photosynthetic bacteria. Nature 278(5705):661–662.  https://doi.org/10.1038/278661a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andam CP, Williams D, Gogarten JP (2010) Natural taxonomy in light of horizontal gene transfer. Biol Philos 25(4):589–602.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-010-9212-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appel TA (1987) The Cuvier-Geoffrey debate: French biology in the decades before Darwin. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Aris-Brosou S (2005) Determinants of adaptive evolution at the molecular level: the extended complexity hypothesis. Mol Biol Evol 22(2):200–209.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballouz S, Francis AR, Lan R, Tanaka MM (2010) Conditions for the evolution of gene clusters in bacterial genomes. PLoS Comput Biol 6(2):e1000672.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borenstein E, Shlomi T, Ruppin E, Sharan R (2007) Gene loss rate: a probabilistic measure for the conservation of eukaryotic genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35(1):e7.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bottery MJ, Wood AJ, Brockhurst MA (2017) Adaptive modulation of antibiotic resistance through intragenomic coevolution. Nat Ecol Evol 1(9):1364–1369.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0242-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brochier C, Philippe H, Moreira D (2000) The evolutionary history of ribosomal protein RpS14: horizontal gene transfer at the heart of the ribosome. Trends Genet 16(12):529–533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02142-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunet TDP, Doolittle WF (2018) The generality of constructive neutral evolution. Biol Philos 33(1):2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9614-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlson MRJ, Zhang B, Fang Z, Mischel PS, Horvath S, Nelson SF (2006) Gene connectivity, function, and sequence conservation: predictions from modular yeast co-expression networks. BMC Genom 7(1):40.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chamosa LS, Álvarez VE, Nardelli M, Quiroga MP, Cassini MH, Centrón D (2017) Lateral antimicrobial resistance genetic transfer is active in the open environment. Sci Rep 7(1):513.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00600-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charlesbois RL, Doolittle WF (2004) Computing prokaryotic gene ubiquity: rescuing the core from extinction. Genome Res 14(12):2469–2477.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3024704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen O, Gophna U, Pupko T (2011) The complexity hypothesis revisited: connectivity rather than function constitutes a barrier to horizontal gene transfer. Mol Biol Evol 28(4):1481–1489.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen O, Gophna U, Pupko T (2013) The complexity hypothesis and other connectivity barriers to lateral gene transfer. In: Gophna U (ed) Lateral gene transfer in evolution. Springer, New York, pp 137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman W (1964) Georges Cuvier, zoologist: a study in the history of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Condit R (1990) The evolution of transposable elements: conditions for establishment in bacterial populations. Evol 44(2):347–359.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05204.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Condit R, Stewart FM, Levin BR (1988) The population biology of bacterial transposons: a priori conditions for maintenance as parasitic DNA. Am Nat 132(1):129–147.  https://doi.org/10.1086/284841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cuvier G (1831) The animal kingdom arranged in conformity with its organization, 2nd edn, M’Murtrie H (trans). G & C & H Carvill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Daubin V, Ochman H (2004) Bacterial genomes as new gene homes: the genealogy of ORFans in E. coli. Genome Res 14(6):1036–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2231904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davids W, Zhang Z (2008) The impact of horizontal gene transfer in shaping operons and protein interaction networks—direct evidence of preferential attachment. BMC Evol Biol 8(1):23.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doolittle WF (2010) The attempt on the life of the tree of life: science, philosophy and politics. Biol Philos 25(4):455–473.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-010-9210-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doolittle WF, Brown JR (1994) Tempo, mode, the progenote, and the universal root. P Natl A Sci USA 91(15):6721–6728.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.15.6721 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dutta C, Archana Pan (2002) Horizontal gene transfer and bacterial diversity. J Biosci 27(1):27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703681 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Francino MP (2012) The ecology of bacterial genes and the survival of the new. Int J Evol Biol 2012:394026.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/394026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franklin-Hall LR (2010) Trashing life’s tree. Biol Philos 25(4):689–709.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-010-9219-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW (2002) Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296(5568):750–752.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frigaard N-U, Martinez A, Mincer TJ, DeLong EF (2006) Proteorhodopsin lateral gene transfer between marine planktonic bacteria and archaea. Nature 439(7078):847–850.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giovannoni SJ, Bibbs L, Cho J-C, Stapels MD, Desiderio R, Vergin KL, Rappé MS et al (2005) Proteorhodopsin in the ubiquitous marine bacterium SAR11. Nature 438(7064):82–85.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gophna U, Ofran Y (2011) Lateral acquisition of genes is affected by the friendliness of their products. P Natl A Sci USA 108(1):343–348.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009775108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gumpert H, Kubicek-Sutherland JZ, Porse A, Karami N, Munck C, Linkevicius M, Adlerberth I, Wold AE, Andersson DI, Sommer MOA (2017) Transfer and persistence of a multi-drug resistance plasmid in situ of the infant gut microbiota in the absence of antibiotic treatment. Front Microbiol 8:1852.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hao W, Golding GB (2006) The fate of laterally transferred genes: life in the fast lane to adaptation or death. Genome Res 16(5):636–643.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.4746406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Itoh T, Takemoto K, Mori H, Gojobori T (1999) Evolutionary instability of operon structures disclosed by sequence comparisons of complete microbial genomes. Mol Biol Evol 16(3):332–346.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jain R, Rivera MC, Lake JA (1999) Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. P Natl A Sci USA 96(7):3801–3806.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jain R, Rivera MC, Moore JE, Lake JA (2002) Horizontal gene transfer in microbial genome evolution. Theor Popul Biol 61(4):489–495.  https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.2002.1596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jordan IK, Wolf YI, Koonin EV (2003) No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly. BMC Evol Biol 3(1):1.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-3-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kacar B, Garmendia E, Tuncbag N, Andersson DI, Hughes D (2017) Functional constraints on replacing an essential gene with its ancient and modern homologs. MBio 8(4):e01276-17.  https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01276-17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lawrence JG (1999) Selfish operons: the evolutionary impact of gene clustering in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 9(6):642–648.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-437X(99)00025-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lawrence JG, Roth JR (1996) Selfish operons: horizontal transfer may drive the evolution of gene clusters. Genetics 143(4):1843–1860Google Scholar
  39. Lercher MJ, Pál C (2008) Integration of horizontally transferred genes into regulatory interaction networks takes many million years. Mol Biol Evol 25(3):559–567.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1(1):1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.000245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Loftie-Eaton W, Bashford K, Quinn H, Dong K, Millstein J, Hunter S, Thomason MK, Merrikh H, Ponciano JM, Top EM (2017) Compensatory mutations improve general permissiveness to antibiotic resistance plasmids. Nat Ecol Evol 1(9):1354–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0243-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Majewski J, Cohan FM (1998) The effect of mismatch repair and heteroduplex formation on sexual isolation in Bacillus. Genetics 148:13–18Google Scholar
  43. Majewski J, Zawadzki P, Pickerill P, Cohan FM, Dowson CG (2000) Barriers to genetic exchange between bacterial species: Streptococcus pneumoniae transofmration. J Bacteriol 182(4):1016–1023.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.4.1016-1023.2000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Makino T, Gojobori T (2007) Evolution of protein-protein interaction network. In: Volff J-N (ed) Gene and protein evolution. Karger, Basil, pp 13–29.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000107601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mira A, Ochman H, Moran NA (2001) Deletional bias and the evolution of bacterial genomes. Trends Genet 17(10):589–596.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02447-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morris JJ, Lenski RE, Zinser ER (2012) The black queen hypothesis: evolution of dependencies through adaptive gene loss. MBio 3(2):e00036-12.  https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00036-12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mulkidjanian AY, Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Mekhedov SL, Sorokin A, Wolf YI, Dufresne A et al (2006) The cyanobacterial genome core and the origin of photosynthesis. P Natl A Sci USA 103(35):13126–13131.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605709103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nelson KE, Clayton RA, Gill SR, Gwinn ML, Dodson RJ, Haft DH, Hickey EK et al (1999) Evidence for lateral gene transfer between archaea and bacteria from genome sequence of Thermotoga maritima. Nature 399(6734):323–329.  https://doi.org/10.1038/20601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Novick A (2019) Cuvierian functionalism. Phil Theor Pract Biol 11:20190821.  https://doi.org/10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Omelchenko MV, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV (2003) Evolution of mosaic operons by horizontal gene transfer and gene displacement in situ. Genome Biol 4(9):R55.  https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-r55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Outram D (1986) Uncertain legislator: Georges Cuvier’s laws of nature in their intellectual context. J Hist Biol 19(3):323–368.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pál C, Hurst LD (2004) Evidence against the selfish operon theory. Trends Genet 20(6):232–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2004.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ (2005) Adaptive evolution of bacterial metabolic networks by horizontal gene transfer. Nat Genet 37(12):1372–1375.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paquola ACM, Asif H, Pereira CAB, Feltes BC, Bonatto D, Lima WC, Mench CFM (2018) Horizontal gene transfer building prokaryote genomes: genes related to exchange between cell and environment are frequently transferred. J Mol Evol 86(3):190–203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-018-9836-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Park C, Zhang J (2012) High expression hampers horizontal gene transfer. Genome Biol Evol 4(4):523–532.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evs030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peter IS, Davidson EH (2015) Genomic control process: development and evolution. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  57. Price MN, Huang KH, Arkin AP, Alm EJ (2005) Operon formation is driven by co-regulation and not by horizontal gene transfer. Genome Res 15(6):809–819.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3368805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rudwick MJS (1997) Georges Cuvier, fossil bones, and geological catastrophes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Russell ES (1982) Form and function: a contribution to the history of animal morphology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  60. Sato M, Miyazaki K (2017) Phylogenetic network analysis revealed the occurrence of horizontal gene transfer of 16S rRNA in the genus Enterobacter. Front Microbiol 8:2225.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schank JC, Wimsatt WC (1986) Generative entrenchment and evolution. PSA PSer 2:33–60.  https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1986.2.192789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwenk K, Wagner GP (2001) Function and the evolution of phenotypic stability: connecting pattern to process. Integr Comp Biol 41(3):552–563.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.3.552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sharma AK, Spudich JL, Doolittle WF (2006) Microbial rhodopsins: functional versatility and genetic mobility. Trends Microbiol 14(11):463–469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2006.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sober E (1984) The nature of selection. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  65. Soucy SM, Huang J, Gogarten JP (2015) Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life. Nat Rev Genet 16(8):472–482.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stoltzfus A (1999) On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution. J Mol Evol 49(2):169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stoltzfus A (2012) Constructive neutral evolution: exploring evolutionary theory’s curious disconnect. Biol Direct 7(1):35.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-7-35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Swithers KS, Soucy SM, Gogarten JP (2012) The role of reticulate evolution in creating innovation and complexity. Int J Evol Biol 2012:418964.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/418964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tian R-M, Cai L, Zhang W-P, Cao H-L, Qian P-Y (2015) Rare events of intragenus and intraspecies horizontal transfer of the 16S rRNA gene. Genome Biol Evol 7(8):2310–2320.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tsukuda M, Kitahara K, Miyazaki K (2017) Comparative RNA function analysis reveals high functional similarity between distantly related bacterial 16S rRNAs. Sci Rep 7(1):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10214-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Valen L (1971) Group selection and the evolution of dispersal. Evol 25(4):591–598.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1971.tb01919.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vulic M, Dionisio F, Taddei F, Radman M (1997) Molecular keys to speciation: DNA polymorphism and the control of genetic exchange in Enterobacteria. P Natl A Sci USA 94(18):9763–9767.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.18.9763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wagner GP, Schwenk K (2000) Evolutionarily stable configurations: functional integration and the evolution of phenotypic stability. In: Hecht MK, Macintyre RJ, Clegg MT (eds) Evolutionary biology. Springer, Boston, pp 155–217.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4185-1_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Watanabe T (1963) Infective heredity of multiple drug resistance in bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 27(1):87–115Google Scholar
  75. Wellner A, Lurie MN, Gophna U (2007) Complexity, connectivity, and duplicability as barriers to lateral gene transfer. Genome Biol 8(8):R156.  https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wideman JG, Novick A, Muñoz-Gómez SA, Doolittle WF (2019) Neutral evolution of cellular phenotypes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 59:87–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2019.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wimsatt WC (1986) Developmental constraints, generative entrenchment, and the innate-acquired distinction. In: Bechtel W (ed) Integrating scientific disciplines. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrect, pp 185–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wimsatt WC (2013a) Evolution and the stability of functional architectures. In: Huneman P (ed) Functions: selection and mechanisms. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 19–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5304-4_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wimsatt WC (2013b) The role of generative entrenchment and robustness in the evolution of complexity. In: Lineweaver CH (ed) Complexity and the arrow of time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 308–331.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139225700.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wimsatt WC (2013c) Entrenchment and scaffolding: an architecture for a theory of cultural change. In Caporael LR, Griesemer JR, Wimsatt WC (eds). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 77-105Google Scholar
  81. Wimsatt WC (2015) Entrenchment as a theoretical tool in evolutionary developmental biology. In: Love AC (ed) Conceptual change in biology: scientific and philosophical perspectives on evolution and development. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 365–402.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9412-1_17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Woese CR, Gibson J, Fox GE (1980) Do genealogical patterns in purple photosynthetic bacteria reflect interspecific gene transfer? Nature 283(5743):212–214.  https://doi.org/10.1038/283212a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wright GD (2010) Antibiotic resistance in the environment: a link to the clinic? Curr Opin Microbiol 13(5):589–594.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2010.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wu Z-W, Wang Q-M, Liu X-Z, Bai F-Y (2016) Intragenomic polymorphism and intergenomic recombination in the ribosomal RNA genes of strains belonging to a yeast species Pichia membranifaciens. Mycol 7(3):102–111.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2016.1204369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations