Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Response to Millstein

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Stefan Linquist and Jonathan Newman contributed significantly to the finalized version of this section.

  2. 2.

    Millstein notes that we used the term “fecundity” in the third of these statements, and she cautions about using terms that the historical figure being interpreted did not use. This is a sound point, and, if we had it to do over again, we would re-word that third statement. The choice of the term was mine, because we used my (Varner 1998, pp. 131–133) original formulation of the five summary statements. I intended “fecund” to mean “fruitful” in the very general sense of producing various products or services that are valuable to humans.

References

  1. Daniels N (2013) Reflective equilibrium. http://stanford.io/2e1aeMe

  2. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species. John Murray, London

  3. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London

  4. Hare RM (1973) Rawls’ theory of justice—I” and “Rawls’ theorgy of justice—II. Philos Q 23:144–155 (and 23: 241-252.)

  5. Leopold A (1949) A Sand County Almanac. Oxford University Press, New York

  6. Longino H (1990) Science as social knowledge. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  7. Meine C (1988) Aldo Leopold: his life and work. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI

  8. Millstein RL (2015) Re-examining the Darwinian Basis for Aldo Leopold’s land ethic. Ethics Policy Environ 18:301–317

  9. Millstein RL (2018a) Understanding Leopold’s concept of ‘interdependence’ for environmental ethics and conservation biology. Philos Sci 85:1127–1139

  10. Millstein RL (2018b) Debunking Myths about Aldo Leopold’s land ethic. Biol Conserv 217:391–396

  11. Millstein RL (2018c) Is Aldo Leopold’s ‘land community’ an individual? In: Bueno O, Chen R, Fagan MB (eds) Individuation, process, and scientific practices. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 279–302

  12. Moon DC, Moon J, Keagy A (2010) Direct and indirect interactions. Nat Educ Knowl 3(10):50

  13. Newman JA, Varner G, Linquist S (2017) Defending biodiversity: environmental science and ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  14. Norton BG (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  15. Varner GE (1998) In nature’s interests? Interests, animal rights, and environmental ethics. Oxford University Press, New York

  16. Varner GE (2012) Personhood, ethics, and animal cognition: situating animals in hare’s two-level utilitarianism. Oxford University Press, New York

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Gary Varner.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This reply refers to the comment available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9724-9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Varner, G. Response to Millstein. Biol Philos 35, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9725-8

Download citation