Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1019–1034 | Cite as

Conceptualizing communities as natural entities: a philosophical argument with basic and applied implications

  • David A. Steen
  • Kyle BarrettEmail author
  • Ellen Clarke
  • Craig Guyer
Article

Abstract

Recent work has suggested that conservation efforts such as restoration ecology and invasive species eradication are largely value-driven pursuits. Concurrently, changes to global climate are forcing ecologists to consider if and how collections of species will migrate, and whether or not we should be assisting such movements. Herein, we propose a philosophical framework which addresses these issues by utilizing ecological and evolutionary interrelationships to delineate individual ecological communities. Specifically, our Evolutionary Community Concept (ECC) recognizes unique collections of species that interact and have co-evolved in a given geographic area. We argue this concept has implications for a number of contemporary global conservation issues. Specifically, our framework allows us to establish a biological and science-driven context for making decisions regarding the restoration of systems and the removal of exotic species. The ECC also has implications for how we view shifts in species assemblages due to climate change and it advances our understanding of various ecological concepts, such as resilience.

Keywords

Climate change Community Invasive species Resilience Reference condition Restoration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

C. Murray provided helpful discussion and assisted in conceptualization of figures. K. Smith, L. Smith, M. Conner, N. Chadwick, J. Grand, C. Anderson, J. Maerz, C. Murray, J. Stiles, S. Stiles, D. Alix, C. Romagosa, J. Goessling, D. Laurencio, M. Wines and B. Folt provided comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. E.P. Cox and Auburn University librarians and staff provided assistance obtaining references. K. Barrett received support from Clemson University’s College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Life Sciences during the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. Anderson MG, Ferree CE (2010) Conserving the stage: climate change and the geophysical underpinnings of species diversity. PLoS ONE 5:e11554Google Scholar
  2. Baum DA (1998) Individuality and the existence of species through time. Syst Biol 47:641–653Google Scholar
  3. Brown JH, Sax DF (2005) Biological invasions and scientific objectivity: reply to Cassey et al. (2005). Austral Ecol 30:481–483Google Scholar
  4. Castree N (2004) Nature is dead! Long live nature! Environ Plan A 36:191–194Google Scholar
  5. Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715Google Scholar
  6. Chase JM, Leibold MA (2003) Ecological Niches. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi YD (2007) Restoration ecology to the future: a call for new paradigm. Restor Ecol 15:351–353Google Scholar
  8. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143Google Scholar
  9. Clarke E, Okasha S (2013) Species and organisms: What are the problems? In: Huneman P (ed) From groups to individuals: evolution and emerging individuality. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 55–76Google Scholar
  10. Clements FE (1916) Plant succession. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publishing No. 242Google Scholar
  11. Coleman KA, Wiley EO (2001) On species individualism: a new defense of the species-as-individuals hypothesis. Phil Sci 68:498–517Google Scholar
  12. Cracraft J (1983) Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr Ornithol 1:159–187Google Scholar
  13. Cracraft J (1987) Species concepts and the ontology of evolution. Biol Phil 2:63–80Google Scholar
  14. Crother BI, Murray CM (2011) Ontology of areas of endemism. J Biogeogr 38:1009–1015Google Scholar
  15. Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292:673–679Google Scholar
  16. Davis MA, Slobodkin LB (2004) The science and values of restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 12:1–3Google Scholar
  17. Donlan J (2005) Re-wilding North America. Nature 436:913–914Google Scholar
  18. Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  19. Eldredge N (1985) Unfinished synthesis: biological hierarchies and modern evolutionary thought. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Ereshefsky M (1992) Units of evolution: essays on the nature of species. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Fauth JE, Bernardo J, Camara M, Resetarits WJ Jr, Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (1996) Simplifying the jargon of community ecology: a conceptual approach. Am Nat 147:282–286Google Scholar
  22. Field JG, Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1982) A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Marine Ecol Progr Ser 8:37–52Google Scholar
  23. Fontaine C, Guimarães PR Jr, Kéfi S, Loeuille N, Memmott J, van der Putten WH et al (2011) The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks. Ecol Lett 14:1170–1181Google Scholar
  24. Fritts TH, Rodda GS (1998) The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case history of Guam. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 29:113–140Google Scholar
  25. Frost DR, Hillis DM (1990) Species in concept and practice: herpetological applications. Herpetologica 46:87–104Google Scholar
  26. Ghiselin MT (1987) Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity. Biol Phil 2:127–143Google Scholar
  27. Gibbs JP, Marquez C, Sterling EJ (2007) The role of endangered species reintroduction in ecosystem restoration: tortoise-cactus interactions on Espanola Island, Galapagos. Restor Ecol 16:88–93Google Scholar
  28. Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:7–26Google Scholar
  29. Gleason HA (1927) Further views on the succession concept. Ecology 8:299–326Google Scholar
  30. Gotelli NJ (2000) Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81:2606–2621Google Scholar
  31. Hawkins BA, Diniz-Filho JAF (2002) The mid-domain effect cannot explain the diversity gradient of Nearctic birds. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:419–426Google Scholar
  32. Helmus MR, Savage K, Diebel MW, Maxted JT, Ives AR (2007) Separating the determinants of phylogenetic community structure. Ecol Lett 10:917–925Google Scholar
  33. Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  34. Higgs ES (1997) What is good ecological restoration? Cons Biol 11:338–348Google Scholar
  35. Highton R (1989) Biochemical evolution in the slimy salamanders of the Plethodon glutinosus complex in the eastern United States. Part I. Geographic protein variation. Ill Biol Monogr 57:1–78Google Scholar
  36. Holsinger KE (1984) The nature of biological species. Phil Sci 51:293–307Google Scholar
  37. Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition and the structure of prey communities. Theor Popul Biol 12:197–229Google Scholar
  38. Huang X, Lei F, Qiao G (2008) Areas of endemism and patterns of diversity for aphids of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau and the Himalayas. J Biogeogr 35:230–240Google Scholar
  39. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  40. Hull DL (1976) Are species really individuals? Syst Zool 25:174–191Google Scholar
  41. Hull DL (1994) A matter of individuality. In: Sober E (ed) Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 363–386Google Scholar
  42. Hunter ML Jr (1996) Fundamentals of conservation biology. Blackwell, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Jachowski DS, Kesler DC, Steen DA, Walters JR (2015) Redefining baselines in endangered species recovery. J Wild Manag 79:3–9Google Scholar
  44. Jackson DR, Milstrey EG (1989) The fauna of Gopher Tortoise burrows. In: Diemer JE, Jackson DR, Landers JL, Layne JN, Wood DA (eds) Relocation symposium proceedings. Florida Games and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report #5, Tallahassee, FL, pp 86–98Google Scholar
  45. Jackson LL, Lopoukhine N, Hillyard D (1995) Ecological restoration: a definition and comments. Rest Ecol 3:71–75Google Scholar
  46. Johnson MTJ, Stinchcombe JR (2007) An emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 22:250–257Google Scholar
  47. Katz E (2009) The big lie: human restoration of nature. In: Kaplan DM (ed) Readings in the philosophy of technology, 2nd edn. Rowman & Littlefield, New York, pp 443–451Google Scholar
  48. Kinlaw A, Grasmueck M (2012) Evidence for and geomorphologic consequences of a reptilian ecosystem engineer: the burrow cascade initiated by the gopher tortoise. Geomorphology 157–158:108–121Google Scholar
  49. Kozak KH, Wiens JJ (2010) Niche conservatism drives elevational diversity patterns in Appalachian salamanders. Am Nat 176:40–54Google Scholar
  50. Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Cons Biol 11:849–856Google Scholar
  51. Lambeck RJ (2002) Focal species and restoration ecology: response to Lindenmayer et al. Cons Biol 16:549–551Google Scholar
  52. Lawton JH (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192Google Scholar
  53. Leaper R, Dunstan PK, Foster SD, Barrett NS, Edgar GJ (2014) Do communities exist? Complex patterns of overlapping marine species distributions. Ecology 95:2016–2025Google Scholar
  54. Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Smith PL, Possingham HP, Fischer J, Oliver I et al (2002) The focal-species approach and landscape restoration: a critique. Cons Biol 16:338–345Google Scholar
  55. Lo Y-S (1999) Natural and artifactual: restored nature as subject. Environ Ethics 21:247–266Google Scholar
  56. Looijen RC, van Andel J (1999) Ecological communities: conceptual problems and definitions. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 2:210–222Google Scholar
  57. Losos JB (1996) Phylogenetic perspectives on community ecology. Ecology 77:1344–1354Google Scholar
  58. Mayden RL (2002) On biological species, species concepts, and individuation in the natural world. Fish Fish 3:171–196Google Scholar
  59. McCain CM (2004) The mid-domain effect applied to elevational gradients: species richness of small mammals in Costa Rica. J Biogeogr 31:19–31Google Scholar
  60. McCoy E, Shrader-Frechette L (1992) Community ecology, scale, and the instability of the stability concept. PSA Proc Bienn Meet Phil Sci Assoc 1992:184–199Google Scholar
  61. McGill BJ (2010) Towards a unification of theories of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 13:627–642Google Scholar
  62. McLachlan JS, Hellmann JJ, Schwartz MW (2007) A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Cons Biol 21:297–302Google Scholar
  63. Means DB, Simberloff D (1987) The peninsula effect: habitat-correlated species declines in Florida’s herpetofauna. J Biogeogr 14:551–568Google Scholar
  64. Mikkelson GM (1997) Methods and metaphors in community ecology: the problem of defining stability. Perspect Sci 5:481–498Google Scholar
  65. Mishler BD, Brandon RN (1987) Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept. Biol Phil 2:397–414Google Scholar
  66. Mitchell RJ, Hiers JK, O’Brien JJ, Jack SB, Engstrom RT (2006) Silviculture that sustains: the nexus between silviculture, frequent prescribed fire, and conservation of biodiversity in longleaf pine forests of the southeastern United States. Can J For Res 36:2723–2736Google Scholar
  67. Morrone JJ (1994) On the identification of areas of endemism. Syst Biol 43:438–441Google Scholar
  68. Mulligan MK, Kirkman LK (2002) Burning influences on wiregrass (Aristida beyrichiana) restoration plantings: natural seedling recruitment and survival. Rest Ecol 10:334–339Google Scholar
  69. Outcalt KW, Brockway DG (2010) Structure and composition changes following restoration treatments of longleaf pine forests on the Gulf Coastal Plain of Alabama. For Ecol Manag 259:1615–1623Google Scholar
  70. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669Google Scholar
  71. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42Google Scholar
  72. Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307:321–326Google Scholar
  73. Platt WJ, Evans GW, Rathbun SL (1988) The population dynamics of a long-lived conifer (Pinus palustris). Am Nat 131:491–525Google Scholar
  74. Reydon TAC (2009) Species and kinds: a critique of Rieppel’s ‘‘one of a kind’’ account of species. Cladistics 25:660–667Google Scholar
  75. Ricciardi A, Simberloff D (2009) Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy. Trends Ecol Evol 24:248–253Google Scholar
  76. Ricklefs RE (1990) Ecology, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Ricklefs RE (2008) Disintegration of the ecological community. Am Nat 172:741–750Google Scholar
  78. Rieppel O (2007) Species: kinds of individuals or individuals of some kind. Cladistics 23:373–384Google Scholar
  79. Schlaepfer MA, Sax DF, Olden JD (2011) The potential conservation value of non-native species. Cons Biol 25:428–437Google Scholar
  80. Sherkow JS, Greely HT (2013) What if extinction is not forever? Science 340:32–33Google Scholar
  81. Simberloff D (2003) Confronting introduced species: a form of xenophobia? Biol Invasions 5:179–192Google Scholar
  82. Simberloff D (2004) Community ecology: Is it time to move on? Am Nat 163:787–799Google Scholar
  83. Sober E (1994) Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism. In: Sober E (ed) Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 329–359Google Scholar
  84. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science and Policy Working Group (2004) SER international primer on ecological restoration, version 2. Society for Ecological Restoration. http://www.ser.org/resources/resources-detail-view/ser-international-primer-on-ecological-restoration#2. Accessed 12 Aug 2014
  85. Steen DA, Smith LL, Conner LM, Litt AR, Provencher L, Hiers JK et al (2013a) Reptile assemblage response to restoration of fire-suppressed longleaf pine sandhills. Ecol Appl 23:148–158Google Scholar
  86. Steen DA, Conner LM, Smith LL, Provencher L, Hiers JK, Pokswinski S et al (2013b) Bird assemblage response to restoration of fire-suppressed longleaf pine sandhills. Ecol Appl 23:134–147Google Scholar
  87. Stein BA, Stauldt A, Cross MS, Dubois NS, Enquist C, Griffis R et al (2013) Preparing for and managing change: climate adaptation for biodiversity and ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 11:502–510Google Scholar
  88. Thuiller W (2004) Patterns and uncertainties of species’ range shifts under climate change. Glob Change Biol 10:2020–2027Google Scholar
  89. Tingley MW, Monahan WB, Beissinger SR, Moritz C (2009) Birds track their Grinellian niche through a century of climate change. Proc Nat Acad Sci 106:19637–19643Google Scholar
  90. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499Google Scholar
  91. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505Google Scholar
  92. White PS, Walker JL (1997) Approximating nature’s variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Rest Ecol 5:338–349Google Scholar
  93. Wilbur HM (1972) Competition, predation, and the structure of the Ambystoma-Rana sylvatica community. Ecology 53:3–21Google Scholar
  94. Wiley EO (1980) Is the evolutionary species fiction?—A consideration of classes, individuals, and historical entities. Syst Zool 29:76–80Google Scholar
  95. Wiley EO (1988) Vicariance biogeography. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 19:513–542Google Scholar
  96. Winterhalder K, Clewell AF, Aronson J (2004) Values and science in ecological restoration—a response to Davis and Slobodkin. Rest Ecol 12:4–7Google Scholar
  97. Wollenberg KC, Vieites DR, van der Meijden A, Glaw F, Cannatella DC, Vences M (2008) Patterns of endemism and species richness in Malagasy cophyline frogs support a key role of mountainous areas for speciation. Evolution 62:1890–1907Google Scholar
  98. Yager LY, Heise CD, Epperson DM, Hinderliter MG (2007) Gopher tortoise response to habitat management by prescribed burning. J Wildl Manag 71:428–434Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Steen
    • 1
  • Kyle Barrett
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ellen Clarke
    • 3
    • 4
  • Craig Guyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Department of Forestry and Environmental ConservationClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  3. 3.All Souls CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  4. 4.School of Philosophy, Religion and History of ScienceUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations