Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 307–319 | Cite as

Making do without selection—review essay of “Cultural Evolution: Conceptual Challenges” by Tim Lewens

  • Carl BrusseEmail author
Review Essay

Abstract

Cultural evolution is a growing, interdisciplinary, and disparate field of research. In ‘Cultural evolution: conceptual challenges”, Tim Lewens offers an ambitious analytical survey of this field that aims to clarify and defend its epistemic contributions, and highlight the limitations and risks associated with them. One overarching contention is that a form of population thinking dubbed the ‘kinetic approach’ should be seen as a unifying and justifying principle for cultural evolution, especially when considering the role of formal modelling. This book makes a number of extremely valuable contributions to the literature. However, I argue that not all is as it may seem regarding the kinetic approach and that, while it does little to diminish the book’s value, the use which Lewens makes for it is problematic.

Keywords

Cultural evolution Evolutionary models Cultural selection Population thinking 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Kim Sterelny, Rachael Brown, Christopher Lean, and the evolutionary theory reading group at the Australian National University for helpful suggestions and discussions.

References

  1. Acerbi A (2016) Tim Lewens. Cultural evolution: conceptual challenges. Philos Sci 84:181–184. doi: 10.1086/688940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acerbi A, Mesoudi A (2015) If we are all cultural Darwinians what’s the fuss about? Clarifying recent disagreements in the field of cultural evolution. Biol Philos 30:481–503. doi: 10.1007/s10539-015-9490-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calcott B (2009) Lineage explanations: explaining how biological mechanisms change. Br J Philos Sci 60:51–78. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axn047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Claidière N, Scott-Phillips TC, Sperber D (2014) How Darwinian is cultural evolution? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369:20130368. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gray RD, Greenhill SJ, Ross RM (2015) The pleasures and perils of Darwinizing culture (with phylogenies). Biol Theory 2:360–375. doi: 10.1162/biot.2007.2.4.360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henrich J (2001) Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations: adoption dynamics indicate that biased cultural transmission is the predominate force in behavioral change. Am Anthropol 103:992–1013. doi: 10.1525/aa.2001.103.4.992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henrich J (2015) The secret of our success: how culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  9. Heyes C (2016) Tim Lewens cultural evolution. Br J Philos Sci 67:1189–1193. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axv054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holden CJ, Mace R (1997) Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of lactose digestion in adults. Hum Biol 69:605–628Google Scholar
  11. Ingold T (2007) The trouble with “evolutionary biology”. Anthropol Today 23:13–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8322.2007.00497.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewens T (2015) Cultural evolution: conceptual challenges. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mitchell SD (2000) Dimensions of scientific law. Philos Sci 67:242–265. doi: 10.1086/392774 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morin O (2015) How traditions live and die. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Sperber D (1996) Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Blackwell, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Sperber D (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science, pp 163–173Google Scholar
  18. Sterelny K (2006) Memes revisited. Br J Philos Sci 57:145–165. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axi157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sterelny K (2012) The evolved apprentice: how evolution made humans unique. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sterelny K (2017) Cultural evolution in California and Paris: a comparative review of Joseph Henrich’s the secret of our success (Princeton University Press, 2016; pp xv, 445) and Olivier Morin’s How traditions live and die (Oxford University Press, 2016; pp xvi, 300). Studies in history and philosophy of science part C: studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences (forthcoming) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Philosophy, Research School of Social SciencesThe Australian National UniversityActonAustralia

Personalised recommendations