Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 811–829 | Cite as

Dismantling standard cognitive science: it’s time the dog has its day

  • Michele Merritt
Article

Abstract

I argue that the standard paradigm for understanding cognition—namely, that thoughts are representational, internal, and propositional—does not account for a large number of genuinely cognitive processes. Instead, if we adopt a more radical approach, one that treats cognition as a cooperative, dynamic, and interactive process, accounting for shared meaning making and embodied thought becomes much more plausible. To support this thesis, rather than turn to the debate as it has been ongoing among philosophers of mind pertaining solely to human thought, I examine our interactions with other animals, and thus, I take a more biological approach to how thought evolves and emerges. Chiefly, I look at the ways in which human-canine interaction (1) ought to count as producing genuinely cognitive phenomena that (2) cannot be properly explicated under a standard model of cognition, and (3) that these sorts of interactive and dynamic pairings between us and our dogs can serve as models for human minds, which I argue are much more shared and cooperative than competing accounts of cognition would have us believe.

Keywords

Canine cognition Cognitive science, embodied cognition Evolution of thought Enactivism 

References

  1. Allen C, Bekoff M (1997) Species of mind: the philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews K (2014a) The animal mind: an introduction to the philosophy of animal cognition. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews K (2014b) Beyond anthropomorphism: attributing psychological properties to animals. In: Beauchamp T, Frey RG (eds) The Oxford handbook of animal ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbib MA (2002) The mirror system, imitation, and the evolution of language. In: Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL (eds) Imitation in animals and artifacts: complex adaptive systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 229–280Google Scholar
  5. Bekoff M (2008) The emotional lives of animals: a leading scientist explores animal joy, sorrow, and empathy—and why they matter. New World Library, NovatoGoogle Scholar
  6. Bekoff M, Pierce J (2009) Wild justice: the moral lives of animals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bekoff M, Allen C, Burghardt G (2002) The cognitive animal: empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition. Bradford Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Berns G (2013) How dogs love us: a neuroscientist and his adopted dog decode the canine brain. New Harvest Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Braitman L (2014) Animal madness: how anxious dogs, compulsive parrots, and elephants in recovery help us understand ourselves. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruck J (2013) Decades-long social memory in bottlenose dolphins. Proc R Soc 280:20131726Google Scholar
  11. Clark A, Chalmers D (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coppinger R, Coppinger L (2001) Dogs: a startling new understanding of canine origins, behavior, and evolution. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Currie G (2007) Narrative frameworks. In: Hutto DD (ed) Narrative and understanding persons: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 60. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Damasio A (2000) The feeling of what happens: body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Mariner Books, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. Damasio A (2005) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Mariner Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Daston L, Mitman G (eds) (2005) Thinking with animals: new perspectives on anthropomorphism. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. De Jaegher H, Di Paolo E (2007) Participatory sense-making: an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 6(4):485–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Jaegher H, Di Paolo E, Gallagher S (2010) Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends Cogn Sci 14(10):441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Rohan A (2003) Deep thinkers. Guardian Unlimited, London. Retrieved 12–20, 2014.Google Scholar
  20. Descartes R (1637) Discourse on method in discourse on method and related writings (1637) (trans: Clarke DM). Penguin edition (1999), Part 5, 40Google Scholar
  21. deWaal F (1996) Good natured: the origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. deWaal F (2006) Primates and philosophers: how morality evolved. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  23. Fouts RS, Fouts DH (1989) The infant Loulis learns signs from cross-fostered chimpanzees. In: Gardner AR, Gardner BT, Van Cantfort T (eds) Teaching sign language to chimpanzees. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 280–292Google Scholar
  24. Gallagher S (2008) Inference or interaction: social cognition without precursors. Philos Explor 11(3):163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R, Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilbert M (1990/1996) Walking together: a paradigmatic social phenomenon. In: Gilbert M (eds) Living together, chapter 6. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, pp. 177–194Google Scholar
  28. Grimm D (2014) Citizen canine: our evolving relationship with cats and dogs. Public Affairs Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamilton D (2011) Dolphin reading test. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/nature/dolphin-reading.html. Retrieved 14 July 2015
  30. Haraway D (2008) When species meet. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  31. Hare B (2013) The genius of dogs: how dogs are smarter than you think. Dutton Adult Trade, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (1998) Communication of food location between human and dog (Canis Familiaris). Evolut Commun 2:137–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horowitz A (2010) Inside of a dog: what dogs see, smell, and know. Scribner Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Howbert JJ, Patterson EE, Stead SM, Brinkmann B, Vasoli V et al (2014) Forecasting seizures in dogs with naturally occurring epilepsy. PLoS One 9(1):e81920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hutto D, Myin E (2012) Radicalizing enactivism: basic minds without content. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. King B (2013) How animals grieve. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marzluff JM, Walls J, Cornell HN, Withy JC, Craig DP (2010) Lasting recognition of threatening people by wild American crows. Anim Behav 79(3):699–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McConnell P (2007) For the love of a dog: understanding emotion in you and your best friend. Ballantine Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Merritt M (2014) Thinking is moving: dance, agency, and a radically enacted mind. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 14(1):95–110Google Scholar
  41. Miklósi GM, Topal J (2004) What can dogs teach us? Anim Behav 67:995–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newell A, Simon H (1976) Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. Commun ACM. 19(3):113–126. http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~cfs/472html/AISEARCH/PSS/PSSH1.html
  43. Noё A (2009) Out of our heads: why you are not your brain and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Pilley JW, Reid AK (2011) Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behav Process 86:184–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Plotnik JM, de Waal F, Reiss D (2006) Self-recognition in an Asian elephant. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:17053–17057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Racca A, Guo K, Meints K, Mills DS (2012) Reading faces: differential lateral gaze bias in processing canine and human facial expressions in dogs and 4-year-old children. PLoS One 7(4):e36076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27(2004):169–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seeman A (2012) Joint attention: new developments in psychology, philosophy of mind, and social neuroscience. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Shipman P (2015) The invaders: how humans and their dogs drove neanderthals to extinction. Belknap Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Skinner BF (1976) About behaviorism. Vintage Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Thompson E (2010) Mind in life: biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Tinbergen N (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Z Tierpsychol 20:410–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tollefson D (2005) Let’s pretend. Children and joint action. Philos Soc Sci 35(1):75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Varela F, Thomson E, Rosch E (1992) The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Weil K (2012) Thinking animals: Why animal studies now?. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Willis CM, Church SM, Guest CM, Cook WA, McCarthy N, Bransbury AJ, Church MRT, Church JCT (2004) Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study. Br Med J 329:712–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Woods V (2011) Bonobo Handshake: a memoir of love and adventure in the Congo. Gotham Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  58. Wynne C (2004) Do animals think?. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arkansas State UniversityJonesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations