Proximate and ultimate causes: how come? and what for?
Proximate and ultimate causes in evolutionary biology have come to conflate two distinctions. The first is a distinction between immediate and historical causes. The second is between explanations of mechanism and adaptive function. Mayr emphasized the first distinction but many evolutionary biologists use proximate and ultimate causes to refer to the second. I recommend that ‘ultimate cause’ be abandoned as ambiguous.
KeywordsProximate cause Ultimate cause Efficient cause Final cause Intentionality Adaptation Natural selection
- Burnham TC, Johnson DDP (2013) The biological and evolutionary logic of human cooperation. Anal Kritik 27:113–135Google Scholar
- Dennett D (2013) The evolution of reasons. In: Bashour B, Muller HD (eds) Contemporary philosophical naturalism and its implications. Routledge (in press)Google Scholar
- Dickins TE, Barton RA (2013) Reciprocal causation and the proximate–ultimate distinction. Biol Philos (in press)Google Scholar
- Haig D (1992) Genomic imprinting and the theory of parent-offspring conflict. Semin Dev Biol 3:153–160Google Scholar
- Hochman A (2013) The phylogeny fallacy and the ontogeny fallacy. Biol Philos (in press)Google Scholar
- Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Hoppitt W, Uller T (2013) More of how and why: cause and effect in biology revisited. Biol Philos (in press)Google Scholar
- Lerner D (ed) (1965) Cause and effect. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Mayr E (1965) Cause and effect in biology. In: Lerner D (ed) Cause and effect. Free Press, New York, pp 33–50Google Scholar
- Watt WB (2013) Causal mechanisms of evolution and the capacity for niche construction. Biol Philos (in press)Google Scholar