Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 903–918

Varieties of parity

Article

Abstract

A central idea of developmental systems theory is ‘parity’ or ‘symmetry’ between genes and non-genetic factors of development. The precise content of this idea remains controversial, with different authors stressing different aspects and little explicit comparisons among the various interpretations. Here I characterise and assess several influential versions of parity.

Keywords

Developmental systems DNA Causation Information 

References

  1. Bergstrom CT, Rosvall M (2011) The transmission sense of information. Biol Philos 26:159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E (1999) An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dretske F (1981) Knowledge and the flow of information. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Falaschi A, Adler J, Khorana HG (1963) Chemically synthesized deoxypolynucleotides as templates for ribonucleic acid polymerase. J Biol Chem 238:3080–3085Google Scholar
  5. Feil R, Fraga MF (2012) Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat Rev Genet 13:97–109Google Scholar
  6. Gannett L (1999) What’s in a cause? The pragmatic dimensions of genetic explanations. Biol Philos 14:349–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gehring WJ (1998) Master control genes in development and evolution: the homeobox story. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  8. Godfrey-Smith P (2000a) On the theoretical role of “Genetic Coding”. Phil Sci 67:26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Godfrey-Smith P (2000b) Explanatory symmetries, preformation, and developmental systems theory. Philos Sci 67 (Proceedings):S322–S331Google Scholar
  10. Grice P (1957) Meaning. Philos Rev 66:377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffiths PE (2001) Genetic information: a metaphor in search of a theory. Phil Sci 68:394–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffiths PE, Gray R (1994) Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. J Phil 91:277–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths PE, Gray RD (2005) Discussion: three ways to misunderstand developmental systems theory. Biol Philos 20:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths PE, Knight RD (1998) What is the developmentalist challenge? Philos Sci 65:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Judson HF (1996) The eighth day of creation. CSHL Press, PlainviewGoogle Scholar
  16. Kitcher PS (2001) Battling the undead: how and how not to resist genetic determinism. In: Singh RS, Krimbas CB, Paul DB, Beatty J (eds) Thinking about evolution: historical, philosophical, and political perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 396–414Google Scholar
  17. Maynard Smith J (2000) The concept of information in biology. Phil Sci 67:177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Millikan RG (2004) The varieties of meaning. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Morgan HD, Sutherland HG, Martin DI, Whitelaw E (1999) Epigenetic inheritance at the agouti locus in the mouse. Nat Genet 23:314–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moss L (1992) A kernel of truth? On the reality of the genetic program. PSA 1992: Philos Sci Assoc (Proceedings) 1:335–348Google Scholar
  21. Moss L (2003) What genes can’t do. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Nirenberg MW, Matthaei HJ (1961) The dependence of cell-free protein synthesis in E. coli upon naturally occurring or synthetic polyribonucleotides. Proc Nat Acad Sci 47:1588–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nishimura S, Jones DS, Khorana HG (1965) Studies on Polynucleotides. XLVIII. The in vitro synthesis of a co-polypeptide containing two amino acids in alternating sequence dependent upon a DNA-like polymer containing two nucleotides in alternating sequence. J Mol Biol 13:302–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Northcott R (2009) Is actual difference making actually different? J Philos 106:629–634Google Scholar
  25. Oyama S (1985) The ontogeny of information. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Oyama S (2000) Causal democracy and causal contributions in developmental systems theory. Philos Sci 67 (Proceedings):S332–S347Google Scholar
  27. Robert JS (2004) Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sarkar S (2003) Genes encode information for phenotypic traits. In: Hitchcock C (ed) Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Blackwell, London, pp 259–272Google Scholar
  29. Scarantino A, Piccinini G (2010) Information without truth. Metaphilosophy 41:313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schaffner K (1998) Genes, behavior, and developmental emergentism: one process, indivisible? Philos Sci 65:209–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seong K, Li D, Shimizu H, Nakamura R, Ishii S (2011) Inheritance of stress-induced, ATF-2-Dependent epigenetic change. Cell 145:1049–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shea N (2007a) Representation in the genome and in other inheritance systems. Biol Philos 22:313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shea N (2007b) Consumers need information: supplementing teleosemantics with an input condition. Res 75:404–435Google Scholar
  34. Shea N (2011) Developmental systems theory formulated as a claim about inherited information. Philos Sci 78:60–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stegmann UE (2005) Genetic information as instructional content. Phil Sci 72:425–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stegmann UE (2009) DNA, inference and information. Brit J Phil Sci 60:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stegmann UE (2012) Causal control and genetic causation. Noûs. [Online First doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00867.x]
  38. Sterelny K (2000) The “Genetic Program” program: a commentary on Maynard Smith on Information in biology. Phil Sci 67:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sterelny K, Griffiths PE (1999) Sex and death: an introduction to philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  40. Sterelny K, Smith K, Dickison M (1996) The extended replicator. Biol Phil 11:377–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stotz K (2006) With ‘genes’ like that, who needs an environment? Postgenomics’s argument for the ‘ontogeny of information’. Philos Sci 73:905–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waters CK (2006) The pluralist stance. Minn Stud Philos Sci 19:7–29Google Scholar
  43. Waters CK (2007) Causes that make a difference. J Philos 104:551–579Google Scholar
  44. Weber M (2005a) Philosophy of experimental biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Weber M (2005b) Genes, causation and intentionality. Hist Phil Life Sci 27:399–411Google Scholar
  46. Weber M (forthcoming) Causal selection vs causal parity in biology: relevant counterfactuals and biologically normal interventions. Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  47. Woodward J (2003) Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodward J (2010) Causation in biology: stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biol Philos 25:287–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Divinity, History and PhilosophyUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations