Convergence, contingency & morphospace
- 383 Downloads
George McGhee’s book “Convergent Evolution: limited forms most beautiful” provides an extensive survey of biological convergence. This paper has two main aims. First, it examines the theoretical claims McGhee makes about convergent evolution—specifically criticizing his use of a total morphospace to understand contingency and his assumption that functional constraints are non-contingent. Second, it sketches a group of important conceptual challenges facing researchers interested in convergence.
KeywordsConvergence Contingency Morphospace Theoretical morphology
Thanks to Brett Calcott and Daniel Nolan for helpful comments.
- Currie A (forthcoming) Covergence as evidence. Br J Philos SciGoogle Scholar
- Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths P (2007) Evo-Devo meets the mind: towards a developmental evolutionary psychology. In: Brandon R, Sansom R (eds) Integrating evolution and development. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- McGhee GR (1999) Theoretical morphology: the concept and its applications. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- McGhee GR (2007) Modeling the spectrum of existent, nonexistent, and impossible biological form: a research program. In: Laubichler MD, Muller GB (eds) Modeling in biology. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- McGhee GR (2011) Convergent evolution: limited forms most beautiful. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Raup DM (1966) Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems. J Paleontol 40(5):1178–1190Google Scholar
- Turner DD (2011) Paleontology: a philosophical introduction. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Wink M (1995) Phylogeny of old and new world vultures (Aves: Accipitridae and Cathartidae) inferred from nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Z Naturforsch C 50(11–12):868–882Google Scholar