Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 595–605

Overqualified: generative replicators as Darwinian reproducers

Hodgson and Knudsen: Darwin’s Conjecture: the search for general principles of social and economic evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2010
Book Review

Abstract

Darwin’s Conjecture is a bold attempt to bring evolutionary explanation to the social sciences, particularly economics. The book outlines the history of Darwinian explanation in social science then puts forward a generalized replicator account of social evolution by natural selection. The authors identify habits and routines as examples of the generative replicators necessary in order that social evolution is Darwinian. This reviewer notes that the replicator approach limits the generality of this account and suggests that habits and routines might better be seen as members of a Darwinian population in the tradition of Godfrey-Smith’s (2009) generalized account of natural selection instead. Furthermore, the existence of levels of social evolution will constrain what evolution can occur low in the hierarchy.

Keywords

Darwinism Economics Evolution Interactor Major transitions Natural selection Replicator Social science 

References

  1. Charlton M (2009) Identifying iron production lineages: a case study in Northwest Wales. In: Shennan S (ed) Pattern and process in cultural evolution. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  2. Cziko G (1995) Without miracles: universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Darwin F (ed) (1887) Life and letters of Charles Darwin, vol 3. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennett D (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Godfrey-Smith P (2000) The replicator in retrospect. Biol Philos 15:403–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Hull D (1980) Individuality and selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lake M, Venti J (2009) Quantitative analysis of macroevolutionary patterning in technological evolution: bicycle design from 1800 to 2000. In: Shennan S (ed) Pattern and process in cultural evolution. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  10. Lewontin, R (1980) Adaptation. In: Levins R, Lewontin R (eds) The dialectical biologist. Cambridge: Havard University Press (Reprinted)Google Scholar
  11. Lock A, Gers M (2011) The cultural evolution of written language and its effects: a Darwinian process from prehistory to the modern day. In: Grigorenko E (ed) Handbook of writing: a mosaic of perspectives and views. Psychology Press. http://www.wisepress.com/index.asp-Q-I-E-9781848728127-writing-a-mosaic-of-newperspectives,381773
  12. Maynard Smith J, Szathmary E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. WH Freeman Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Morgan C (1896) Habit and instinct. Edward Arnold, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Richerson P, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Ritchie D (1896) Social evolution. Int J Ethics 6(2):165–181Google Scholar
  16. Shennan S (ed) (2009) Pattern and process in cultural evolution. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  17. Sperber D (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Aunger R (ed) Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Sterelny K (2001) Niche construction, developmental systems, and the extended replicator. In: Oyama S, Griffiths P, Gray R (2003). Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Sterelny K (2006) Memes revisited. Br J Philos Sci 57:145–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Veblen T (1899) The theory of the leisure class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Wimsatt W, Griesemer J (2007) Reproducing entrenchments to scaffold culture. In: Sansom R, Brandon R (eds) Integrating evolution and development: from theory to practice. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations