Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 489–500 | Cite as

Darwinian spaces: Peter Godfrey-Smith on selection and evolution

  • Kim SterelnyEmail author
Review Essay

Darwinian populations

Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection is a superb work, introducing an important analytical technique, and applying it to a range of difficult and contested issues within evolutionary theory. The core idea of the book is that of a Darwinian Population (and, derivatively, a Darwinian individual). In developing this concept, Peter Godfrey-Smith builds on a long-standing tradition within evolutionary theory, that of developing a spare, bare-bones specification of the machine of selective change, both to better articulate the core causal processes of biological evolution, and to explore the possibility that selective regimes explain change in other domains (see also Okasha 2006). Godfrey-Smith’s ingredients are familiar: Darwinian Populations are populations of interacting individuals that (potentially) reproduce; that vary from one another in ways that sometimes influence their reproductive potential; and when reproduction does take place, offspring resemble...

Keywords

Brushtail Possum Fitness Difference Marginal Case Extended Phenotype Difference Maker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Clarke E (2011) Plant individuality and multilevel selection theory. In: Calcott B, Sterelny K (eds) Major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 227–250Google Scholar
  2. Combes C (2005) The art of being a parasite. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawkins R (1983) Universal Darwinism. In: Bendall DS (ed) Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 403–425Google Scholar
  5. Dawkins R (1996) Climbing mount improbable. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Simon and Shuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Gould SJ (1996) Triumph of the root-heads. Nat Hist 105:10–17Google Scholar
  8. Hull D (1988) Interactors and Vehicles. In: Plotkin. HC (ed) The role of behaviour in evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  9. Hull D (1989) The metaphysics of evolution. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Janzen D (1966) Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20(3):249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kauffman SA (1993) The origins of order: self-organisation and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirk D (2005) A twelve step program for evolving multicellularity and a division of labor. BioEssays 27(3):299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lane N (2005) Power, sex, suicide: mitochondria and the meaning of life. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewontin RC (1970) The Units of Selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 1:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McShea DW (2002) A complexity drain on cells in the evolution of multicellularity. Evolution 56:441–452Google Scholar
  16. Michod R (2011) Evolutionary transitions in individuality: multicellularity and sex. In: Calcott B, Sterelny K (eds) Major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 169–198Google Scholar
  17. Nilsson D-E, Pelger S (1994) A Pessimistic Estimate of the Time Required for an Eye to Evolve. Proc R Soc Lond B 256:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Odling-Smee J, Laland K et al (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  19. Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the units of selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sperber D (1996) Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy and Tempo and ModeAustralian National UniversityActonAustralia
  2. 2.Philosophy and Tempo and ModeVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations