Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 489–500 | Cite as

Darwinian spaces: Peter Godfrey-Smith on selection and evolution

Review Essay


  1. Clarke E (2011) Plant individuality and multilevel selection theory. In: Calcott B, Sterelny K (eds) Major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 227–250Google Scholar
  2. Combes C (2005) The art of being a parasite. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawkins R (1983) Universal Darwinism. In: Bendall DS (ed) Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 403–425Google Scholar
  5. Dawkins R (1996) Climbing mount improbable. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Simon and Shuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Gould SJ (1996) Triumph of the root-heads. Nat Hist 105:10–17Google Scholar
  8. Hull D (1988) Interactors and Vehicles. In: Plotkin. HC (ed) The role of behaviour in evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  9. Hull D (1989) The metaphysics of evolution. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Janzen D (1966) Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20(3):249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kauffman SA (1993) The origins of order: self-organisation and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirk D (2005) A twelve step program for evolving multicellularity and a division of labor. BioEssays 27(3):299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lane N (2005) Power, sex, suicide: mitochondria and the meaning of life. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewontin RC (1970) The Units of Selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 1:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McShea DW (2002) A complexity drain on cells in the evolution of multicellularity. Evolution 56:441–452Google Scholar
  16. Michod R (2011) Evolutionary transitions in individuality: multicellularity and sex. In: Calcott B, Sterelny K (eds) Major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 169–198Google Scholar
  17. Nilsson D-E, Pelger S (1994) A Pessimistic Estimate of the Time Required for an Eye to Evolve. Proc R Soc Lond B 256:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Odling-Smee J, Laland K et al (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  19. Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the units of selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sperber D (1996) Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy and Tempo and ModeAustralian National UniversityActonAustralia
  2. 2.Philosophy and Tempo and ModeVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations