Do the evolutionary origins of our moral beliefs undermine moral knowledge?
- 888 Downloads
According to some recent arguments, (Joyce in The evolution of morality, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2006; Ruse and Wilson in Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995; Street in Philos Studies 127: 109–166, 2006) if our moral beliefs are products of natural selection, then we do not have moral knowledge. In defense of this inference, its proponents argue that natural selection is a process that fails to track moral facts. In this paper, I argue that our having moral knowledge is consistent with, (a) the hypothesis that our moral beliefs are products of natural selection, and (b) the claim (or a certain interpretation of the claim) that natural selection fails to track moral facts. I also argue that natural selection is a process that could track moral facts, albeit imperfectly. I do not argue that we do have moral knowledge. I argue instead that Darwinian considerations provide us with no reason to doubt that we do, and with some reasons to suppose that we might.
KeywordsEvolutionary ethics Moral realism Moral epistemology
I would like to thank Elliott Sober for his invaluable help with this paper, provided promptly at each of its many stages. For reading earlier drafts and for their helpful feedback, I’d like to thank Kim Sterelny, an anonymous referee from this journal, and: Alexander Bird, Alex Broadbent, David Copp, Daniel Guevara, Russ Shafer-Landau, Hallvard Lillehammer, William A. Rottschaefer, Mark van Roojen, and Ralph Wedgwood. I would also like to thank Sorin Bangu, Simon Blackburn, Steve John, Jonathan Ellis, and Richard Otte.
- Blackburn S (2010) Sharon street on the independent normative truth as such. Available at http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/~swb24/PAPERS/Meanstreet.htm
- Boyd R (1988) How to be a moral realist. In: Sayre-McCord G (ed) Essays on moral realism. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 181–228Google Scholar
- Carruthers P, James S (2008) Evolution and the possibility of moral realism. Philos Phenomenol Res LXXVII:237–244Google Scholar
- Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1981Google Scholar
- Harman G (1977) The nature of morality. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Joyce R (2006) The evolution of morality. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Lillehammer H (2010) Methods of ethics and the descent of man: Darwin and Sidgwick on ethics and evolution. Biol PhilosGoogle Scholar
- Reichenbach H (1956) The direction of time. University of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Ruse M, Wilson EO (1995) Moral philosophy as applied science. In: Sober E (ed) Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 421–438Google Scholar
- Skarsaune K (2010) Darwin and moral realism: survival of the iffiest. Philos StudiesGoogle Scholar
- Sober E (1984) The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. MIT press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Sterelny K (2010) Moral nativism: a sceptical response. Mind Lang 25(3):279–297Google Scholar
- Sturgeon N (1985) Moral explanations. In: Zimmerman D, Copp D (eds) Morality, reason and truth. Rowman and Allanheld, TotowaGoogle Scholar
- Wielenberg E (2010) On the evolutionary debunking of morality. EthicsGoogle Scholar