Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 689–709 | Cite as

Trashing life’s tree

Article

Abstract

The Tree of Life has traditionally been understood to represent the history of species lineages. However, recently researchers have suggested that it might be better interpreted as representing the history of cellular lineages, sometimes called the Tree of Cells. This paper examines and evaluates reasons offered against this cellular interpretation of the Tree of Life. It argues that some such reasons are bad reasons, based either on a false attribution of essentialism, on a misunderstanding of the problem of lineage identity, or on a limited view of scientific representation. I suggest that debate about the Tree of Cells and other successors to the traditional Tree of Life should be formulated in terms of the purposes these representations may serve. In pursuing this strategy, we see that the Tree of Cells cannot serve one purpose suggested for it: as an explanation for the hierarchical nature of taxonomy. We then explore whether, instead, the tree may play an important role in the dynamic modeling of evolution. As highly-integrated complex systems, cells may influence which lineage components can successfully transfer into them and how they change once integrated. Only if they do in fact have a substantial role to play in this process might the Tree of Cells have some claim to be the Tree of Life.

Keywords

The tree of life Phylogenetics Evolutionary modeling Lineages Tree of cells 

References

  1. Andam CP, Williams D, Gogarten JP (2010) Natural taxonomy in light of horizontal gene transfer. Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-010-9212-8
  2. Bapteste E, Boucher Y (2008) Lateral gene transfer challenges principles of microbial systematics. Cell 16:200–207Google Scholar
  3. Bapteste E, Susko E, Leigh J, MacLeod D, Charlebois RL, Doolittle WF (2005) Do orthologous gene phylogenies really support tree-thinking? BMC Evol Biol 5:33. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-5-33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bapteste E, Burian RM (2010) On the need for integrative phylogenomics: and some steps toward its creation. Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-010-9218-2
  5. Batterman R (2002) The devil in the details. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Beatty J (1995) The evolutionary contingency thesis. In: Wolters G, Lennox J (eds) Concepts, theories and rationality in the biological sciences. University of Pittsburgh Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  7. Beiko RG (2010) Gene sharing and genome evolution: networks in trees and trees in networks. Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-010-9217-3
  8. Beldade P, Koops K, Brakefield P (2002) Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:14262–14267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouchard F (2010) Symbiosis, lateral function transfer and the (many) saplings of life. Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-010-9209-3
  10. Boucher Y, Bapteste E (2009) Revisiting the concept of lineage in prokaryotes: a phylogenetic perspective. BioEssays 31:526–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cairns-Smith AG (1985) Seven clues to the origin of life: a scientific detective story. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciccarelli F, Doerks T, von Mering C, Creevey C, Snel B, Bork P (2006) Towards automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311:1283–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coyne J (2009) Why evolution is true. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Dagan T, Martin W (2006) The tree of one percent. Genome Biol 7(10):118. doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dagan T, Martin W (2007) Ancestral genome sizes specify the minimum rate of lateral gene transfer during prokaryote evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:870–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dagan T, Artzy-Randrup Y, Martin W (2008) Modular networks and cumulative impact of lateral transfer in prokaryote genome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(29):10039–10044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Danchin A (2002) The Delphic boat. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Darwin C (1859) The origin of species by means of natural selection, 1st edn. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Doolittle WF (1996) At the core of the archae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:8797–8799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doolittle WF (1999) Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science 284:2124–2128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doolittle WF (2004) W. Ford Doolittle. Curr Biol 14:R176–R177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doolittle WF (2005) If the tree of life fell, would we recognize the sound? In: Sapp J (ed) Microbial phylogeny and evolution: concepts and controversies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 119–133Google Scholar
  23. Doolittle WF (2009a) The practice of classification and the theory of evolution, and what the demise of Charles Darwin’s tree of life hypothesis means for both of them. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:2221–2228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doolittle WF (2009b) Eradicating typological thinking in prokaryotic systematics and evolution. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol doi:10.1101/sqb.2009.74.002
  25. Doolittle WF, Bapteste E (2007) Pattern pluralism and the tree of life hypothesis. Proc Acad Nat Sci USA 104:2043–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doolittle WF (2010) The attempt on the life of the tree of life: science, philosophy and politics. Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-010-9210-x
  27. Forgacs G, Newman S (2005) Biological physics of the developing embryo. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fournier G, Huang J, Gogarten JP (2009) Horizontal gene transfer from extinct and extant lineages: biological innovation and the coral of life. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:2229–2239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Franklin LR (2007) Bacteria, sex and systematics. Philos Sci 74:69–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Galtier N, Daubin V (2008) Dealing with incongruence in phylogenetic analyses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:4023–4029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Gogarten JP, Doolittle WF, Lawrence JG (2002) Prokaryotic evolution in light of gene transfer. Mol Biol Evol 19:2226–2238Google Scholar
  33. Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful life: the burgess shale and the nature of history. W. W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Gribaldo S, Brochier C (2009) Phylogeny of prokaryotes: does it exist and why should we care? Res Microbiol 160:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hacker J, Kaper JB (2000) Pathogenicity islands and the evolution of microbes. Annu Rev Microbiol 54:641–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jain R, Rivera M, Lake J (1999) Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:3801–3806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson K (2007) Natural history as stamp collecting: a brief history. Arch Nat Hist 34:244–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kitcher P (1999) The hegemony of molecular biology. Biol Philos 14:195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kitcher P (2001) Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Labov W (1994) Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: internal factors. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Lake J, Moore J, Simonson A, Rivera M (2005) Fulfilling Darwin’s dream. In: Sapp J (ed) Microbial phylogeny and evolution: concepts and controversies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 184–206Google Scholar
  42. Lawton G (2009) Uprooting Darwin’s tree. New Sci 201:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lerat E, Daubin V, Moran NA (2003) From gene trees to organismal phylogeny in prokaryotes: the case of the g-proteobacteria. PLoS Biol 1:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lienae EK, DeSalle R (2009) Is the microbial tree of life verificationist? Cladisics 25:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Loewer B (2009) Why is there anything except physics? Synthese 170:217–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lopez P, Bapteste P (2009) Molecular phylogeny: reconstructing the forest. C R Biologist 332:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Malkiel Y (1967) Every word has its own history. Glossa 1:137–149Google Scholar
  48. McMahon A (1994) Understanding language change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Michod R (1999) Darwinian dynamics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  50. Nowak M (2006) Evolutionary dynamics: exploring the equations of life. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Groisman EA (2000) Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 405:299–304Google Scholar
  52. O’Malley M, Dupré J (2007) Size doesn’t matter: towards a more inclusive philosophy of biology. Biol Philos 22:155–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Philippe H, Douady C (2003) Horizontal gene transfer and phylogenetics. Curr Opin Microbiol 6:498–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Phillips B (2006) Word frequency and lexical diffusion. Palgrave Macmillan, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  55. Pinker S (1994) The language instinct: how the mind creates language. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Planet P (2002) Reexamining microbial evolution through the lens of horizontal transfer. In: DeSalle R, Giribet G, Wheeler W (eds) Molecular systematics and evolution: theory and practice. Birkhauser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  57. Puigbò P, Wolf YI, Koonin E (2009) Search for a ‘tree of life’ in the thicket of the phylogenetic forest. J Biol 8:59. doi:10.1186/jbiol159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Raff R (1996) The shape of life: genes. development, and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  59. Shapiro J, Dworkin M (1997) Bacteria as multicellular organisms. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Simon H (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Sterelny K, Griffiths P (1999) Sex and death. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  62. Strevens M (2008) Depth: an account of scientific explanation. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  63. Thaler D (2009) The cytoplasmic structure hypothesis for ribosome assembly, veritcal inheritance, and phylogeny. BioEssays 31:774–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Toulmin S (1953) The philosophy of science: an introduction. Hutchinson’s University Library, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson EO (1994) Naturalist. Grand Central Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson J (1999) Biological individuality: the identity and persistence of living entities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson R (2005) Genes and the agents of life: the individual in the fragile sciences. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  68. Woese C (2002) On the evolution of cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8742–8747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Woese C (2005) Evolving biological organization. In: Sapp J (ed) Microbial phylogeny and evolution: concepts and controversies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 99–118Google Scholar
  70. Yates T, Salazar-Bravo J, Dragoo J (2004) The importance of the tree of life to society. In: Cracraft J, Donoghue M (eds) Assembling the tree of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 7–17Google Scholar
  71. Zhaxybayeva O, Gogarten JP (2004) Cladogenesis, coalescence and the evolution of the three domains of life. Trends Genet 20:182–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhaxybayeva O, Lapierre P, Gogarten JP (2004) Genome mosaicism and organismal lineages. Trends Genet 20:254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations