Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 419–437 | Cite as

Evidentiary inference in evolutionary biology

Review of Elliott Sober’s (2008) Evidence and evolution: the logic behind the science. Cambridge University Press, New York
Review Essay

References

  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  2. Atrash H, Friede A, Hogue C (1987) Abdominal pregnancy in the United States: frequency and maternal mortality. Obstet Gynecol 69:333–337Google Scholar
  3. Baird C (1983) The Fisher/Pearson chi-squared controversy: a turning point for inductive inference. Br J Philos Sci 34:105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boik R (2004) Commentary. In: Taper M, Lele S (eds) The nature of scientific evidence. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 167–180Google Scholar
  5. Burham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodal inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Cartwright N, Frigg R (2007) String theory under scrutiny. Phys World 3:14–15Google Scholar
  7. Colyvan M (1999) Contrastive empiricism and indispensability. Erkenntnis 51:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coyne J (2009) Why evolution is true. Viking Adult, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Dowe DL, Gardner S, Oppy G (2007) Bayes not bust! Why simplicity is no problem for Bayesians. Br J Philos Sci 58:709–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellison AM (2004) Bayesian inference in ecology. Ecol Lett 7:509–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitelson B (2007) Likelihoodism, Bayesianism, and relational confirmation. Synthese 156:473–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forster M (2000) Key concepts in model selection: performance and generalizability. J Math Psychol 44:205–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forster M, Sober E (1994) How to tell when simpler, more unified, or less ad hoc theories will provide more accurate predictions. Br J Philos Sci 45:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forster M, Sober E (forthcoming) AIC scores as evidence—a Bayesian interpretation. In: Forster M, Bandyopadhyay P (eds) The philosophy of statistics. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  15. Good I (1983) 46656 Varieties of Bayesianism. In: Good thinking: the foundations of probability and its applications. University of Minnesota Press, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  16. Gould S (1980) The panda’s thumb. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton M (2009) Population genetics. Wiley-Blackwell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Hellman G (1999) Some ins and outs of indispensability: a model-structuralist approach. In: Cantini A, Casari E, Minari P (eds) Logic and foundations of mathematics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 25–39Google Scholar
  19. Howson C, Urbach P (1993) Statistical reasoning: a Bayesian approach. Open Court, PeruGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeffrey R (1983) The logic of decision, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelcher SA, Thomas MA (2007) Model use in phylogenetics: nine key questions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kieseppä IA (2001) Statistical model selection criteria and the philosophical problem of underdetermination. Br J Philos Sci 52:761–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kitcher P (1983) Abusing science: the case against creationism. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Lande R (1976) Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewis D (1986) A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. In: Philosophical papers, vol II. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. McCarthy MM (2007) Bayesian methods for ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Millstein R (2008) Distinguishing drift and selection empirically: ‘The great snail debate’ of the 1950s. J Hist Biol 41:339–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morrison M (2002) Modelling populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and biometry. Br J Philos Sci 53:39–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Myrvold W, Harper B (2002) Model selection, simplicity, and scientific inference. Phil Sci 69:S135–S149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orzack S, Sober E (2001) Adaptation, phylogenetic inertia, and the method of controlled comparisons. In: Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Pollock J (1990) Nomic probability and the foundations of induction. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Ronquist F (2004) Bayesian inference of character evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:475–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Royall R (1997) Statistical evidence: a likelihood paradigm. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwartz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Soames S (2003) The rise and fall of the empiricist criterion of meaning. In: Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 271–299Google Scholar
  36. Sober E (2005) Is drift a serious alternative to natural selection as an explanation of complex adaptive traits? R Inst Phil Suppl 80(56):125–153Google Scholar
  37. Sterelny K (2005) Made by each other: organisms and their environment. Biol Phil 20:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Zucchini W (2000) An introduction to model selection. J Math Psychol 44:41–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations