Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 347–360

Cultural transmission and social control of human behavior

  • Laureano Castro
  • Luis Castro-Nogueira
  • Miguel A. Castro-Nogueira
  • Miguel A. Toro
Article

Abstract

Humans have developed the capacity to approve or disapprove of the behavior of their children and of unrelated individuals. The ability to approve or disapprove transformed social learning into a system of cumulative cultural inheritance, because it increased the reliability of cultural transmission. Moreover, people can transmit their behavioral experiences (regarding what can and cannot be done) to their offspring, thereby avoiding the costs of a laborious, and sometimes dangerous, evaluation of different cultural alternatives. Our thesis is that, during ontogeny, the evaluative communication (approval/disapproval) between parents and offspring is substituted by other evaluative communications among peers, like individuals of the same generation. Each person belongs to a reference social group with individuals that interact more intensively. Humans have developed psychological mechanisms that enable cultural transmission by being receptive to parental advice as well as their reference social group. The selective pressure that promoted these new evaluative interactions arose to facilitate the establishment of efficient cooperative relationships. In short, the social control of behavior is essential to understand human cultural transmission.

Keywords

Cultural evolution Assessor Homo suadens Social learning 

References

  1. Baum WB (1994) Understanding behaviorism: science, behavior, and culture. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. The Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1995) Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethol Sociobiol 16:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1996) Why culture is common but cultural evolution is rare? Proc Br Acad 88:77–93Google Scholar
  5. Castro L, Toro MA (1995) Human evolution and the capacity to categorise. J Soc Evol Syst 18:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castro L, Toro MA (1998) The long and winding road to the ethical capacity. Hist Philos Life Sci 20:77–92Google Scholar
  7. Castro L, Toro MA (2002) Cultural transmission and the capacity to approve or disapprove of offspring’s behaviour. Jom-emit 6 (http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/2002/vol6/castro_l&toro_ma.html)
  8. Castro L, Toro MA (2004) The evolution of culture: from primate social learning to human culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10235–10240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castro L, Toro MA (2007) Mutual benefit cooperation and ethnic cultural diversity. Theor Popul Biol 79:392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro L, Serrano JM, Toro MA (1998) Conceptual capacity to categorize and the evolution of altruism. J Theor Biol 192:561–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castro L, Medina A, Toro MA (2004) Hominid cultural transmission and the evolution of language. Biol Philos 19:721–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castro L, Castro-Nogueira L, Castro-Nogueira MA (2008) ¿Quién teme a la naturaleza humana? Homo suadens y el bienestar en la cultura: biología evolutiva. metafísica y ciencias sociales, Tecnos, MadridGoogle Scholar
  13. Castro-Nogueira L (2009) Bubbles, globes, wrappings, and plektopoi: minimal notes to rethink metaphysics from the standpoint of the social sciences. Environ Plan D Soc Space 27:87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cosmides L, Tooby J (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 19–136Google Scholar
  15. Durkheim E (1962) The rules of the sociological method. Free Press, Glencoe, ILGoogle Scholar
  16. Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2003) The nature of human altruism. Nature 425:785–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004) Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cogn Sci 8:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Gurven M, Kaplan H, Gutierrez M (2006) How long does it take to become a proficient hunter? Implications for the evolution of extended development and long life span. J Hum Evol 51:454–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henrich J, Boyd R (1998) The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between group-differences. Evol Hum Behav 19:215–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henrich J, McElreath R (2003) The evolution of cultural evolution. Evol Anthropol 12:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hume D (2000) A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Inoue-Nakamura N, Matsuzawa T (1997) Development of stone tool use by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 111(2):159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kroeber A (1917) The superorganic. Am Anthropol 19:163–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lumsden C, Wilson EO (1981) Genes, mind and culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. McElreath R, Boyd R, Richerson P (2003) Shared norms can lead the evolution of ethnic markers. Curr Anthropol 44:122–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakahashi W (2007) The evolution of conformist transmission in social learning when the environment changes periodically. Theor Popul Biol 72:52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nisbett R, Cohen D (1996) Culture of honor. Westview Press, Denver, COGoogle Scholar
  29. Premack D (2004) Psychology. Is language the key to human intelligence? Science 303:318–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2001) Culture is part of human biology: why the superorganic concept serves the human sciences badly. In: Maasen S, Winterhager M (eds) Science studies: probing the dynamics of scientific knowledge. Verlag, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  31. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogers AR (1988) Does biology constrain culture? Am Anthropol 90:819–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon H (1990) A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. Science 250:1665–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith A (1976) The theory of moral sentiments. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Stevens JR, Hauser MD (2004) Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends Cogn Sci 8:60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Tooby J, Cosmides L (2005) Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In: Buss David M (ed) The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  38. Wakano JY, Aoki K (2007) Do social learning and conformist bias coevolve? Henrich and Boyd revisited. Theor Popul Biol 72:504–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker R, Hill K, Kaplan H, McMillan G (2002) Age-dependency in hunting ability among the Ache of Eastern Paraguay. J Hum Evol 42:639–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laureano Castro
    • 1
  • Luis Castro-Nogueira
    • 2
  • Miguel A. Castro-Nogueira
    • 2
  • Miguel A. Toro
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro Asociado de MadridUNEDMadridSpain
  2. 2.Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, Departamento de Sociología IUNEDMadridSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Producción Animal, ETS Ingenieros AgrónomosCiudad UniversitariaMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations