Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 439–447 | Cite as

The long reach of philosophy of biology

Michael Ruse: The Oxford handbook of philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, 2008


The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology covers a broad range of topics in this field. It is not just a textbook focusing on evolutionary theory but encompasses ethics, social science and behaviour too. This essay outlines the scope of the work, discusses some points on methodology in the philosophy of biology, and then moves on to a more detailed analysis of cultural evolution and the applicability of a philosophy of biology toolkit to the social sciences. It is noted that concepts like the species concept may generalise to other domains whilst failing to account for the nature of all species. Finally, the author notes the omission of any discussion of information in biology.


Culture Development Ethics Evolution Information Philosophy of biology Social science Species 


  1. Barrett J (2007) Theological implications of the cognitive science of religion. In: Bulbulia J, Stosis R, Harris E, Genet R, Genet C, Wyman K (eds) The evolution of religion: studies, theories, and critiques. Collins Foundation, Santa Margarita, pp 386–396Google Scholar
  2. Blair C, Gamson D, Thorne S, Baker D (2005) Rising mean IQ: cognitive demand of mathematics education for young children, population exposure to formal schooling, and the neurobiology of the prefrontal cortex. Intelligence 33:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd R, Richerson P (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulbulia J (2007) The evolution of religion. In: Dunbar R, Barrett L (eds) The oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Ereshefsky M (unpublished manuscript). Microbiology and the species problem.
  7. Flynn J (2007) What is intelligence? Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Gers M (2008) The case for memes. Biol Theory 3(4):305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gould S, Lewontin R (1979) The spandrels of san marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hrdy S (1999) Mother nature: a history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Lachapelle J (2000) Cultural evolution, reductionism in the social sciences, and explanatory pluralism. Philos Soc Sci 30:331–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maynard Smith J (1978) Optimization theory in evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Pica P, Lemer C, Izard V, Dehaene S (2004) Exact and approximate arithmetic in an amazonian indigene group. Science 306:499–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Renfrew C (2008) Prehistory: the making of the human mind. Modern Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Richerson P, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Riede F (2009) Tangled trees: modeling material culture evolution as host-associate cospeciation. In: Shennan S (ed) Pattern and process in cultural evolution. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Sterelny K (2006) Memes revisited. Br J Philos Sci 57:145–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sterelny K, Godfrey-Smith P (2007). Biological information. The stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy online
  20. Temkin I, Eldredge N (2007) Phylogenetics and material cultural evolution. Curr Anthropol 48(1):146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations