Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 279–286 | Cite as

Review of Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology

  • Brant PridmoreEmail author

In producing its companion to the philosophy of biology, Cambridge University Press has done a considerable service to readers with some background—though not necessarily very extensive background—in philosophy who want to find out what philosophy of biology is about and familiarise themselves with the current state of play.

As one would expect of a survey collection from Cambridge University Press the book includes many good articles by eminent scholars who introduce the reader to the issues in an engaging fashion and provide plenty of guidance for further reading. For example, David Buller the important issues in evolutionary psychology in the context of the rivalry between Evolutionary Psychology—i.e., the discipline narrowly conceived in the Tooby-Cosmides mould—and human behavioural ecology. The first emphasises the importance of modular behavioural adaptations in the Pleistocene while the second is less firmly committed to modularity in human cognitive architecture and accords a...


  1. Goodrich ES (1912) The evolution of living organisms. T.C. and E.C. Jack, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Gould SJ (1980) The panda’s thumb. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Hopson JA (1975) The evolution of cranial display structures in hadrosaurian dinosaurs. Paleobiology 1:21–43Google Scholar
  4. Turner D (2000) The functions of fossils: inference and explanation in functional morphology. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 31:193–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Weishampel DB (1997) Dinosaurian cacophony: inferring function in extinct organisms. Bioscience 47:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian National UniversityActonAustralia

Personalised recommendations