Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 231–246

Natural selection and history


DOI: 10.1007/s10539-008-9149-3

Cite this article as:
Beatty, J. & Desjardins, E.C. Biol Philos (2009) 24: 231. doi:10.1007/s10539-008-9149-3


In “Spandrels,” Gould and Lewontin criticized what they took to be an all-too-common conviction, namely, that adaptation to current environments determines organic form. They stressed instead the importance of history. In this paper, we elaborate upon their concerns by appealing to other writings in which those issues are treated in greater detail. Gould and Lewontin’s combined emphasis on history was three-fold. First, evolution by natural selection does not start from scratch, but always refashions preexisting forms. Second, preexisting forms are refashioned by the selection of whatever mutational variations happen to arise: the historical order of mutations needs to be taken into account. Third, the order of environments and selection pressures also needs to be taken into account.


Adaptationism History Historicity Chance Contingency 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations