Biology & Philosophy

, 24:247

Spandrels and a pervasive problem of evidence

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10539-008-9144-8

Cite this article as:
Forber, P. Biol Philos (2009) 24: 247. doi:10.1007/s10539-008-9144-8

Abstract

Evolutionary biology, indeed any science that attempts to reconstruct prehistory, faces practical limitations on available data. These limitations create the problem of contrast failure: specific observations may fail to discriminate between rival evolutionary hypotheses. Assessing the risk of contrast failure provides a way to evaluate testing protocols in evolutionary science. Here I will argue that part of the methodological critique in the Spandrels paper involves diagnosing contrast failure problems. I then distinguish the problem of contrast failure from the more familiar philosophical problem of underdetermination, and demonstrate how contrast failure arises in scientific practice with an investigation into Lewontin and White’s (Evolution 14:116–129, 1960) estimation of an adaptive landscape.

Keywords

Adaptation Adaptive landscapes Confirmation Evolutionary biology Spandrels Underdetermination 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations