Optimality modeling in a suboptimal world
- 286 Downloads
The fate of optimality modeling is typically linked to that of adaptationism: the two are thought to stand or fall together (Gould and Lewontin, Proc Relig Soc Lond 205:581–598, 1979; Orzack and Sober, Am Nat 143(3):361–380, 1994). I argue here that this is mistaken. The debate over adaptationism has tended to focus on one particular use of optimality models, which I refer to here as their strong use. The strong use of an optimality model involves the claim that selection is the only important influence on the evolutionary outcome in question and is thus linked to adaptationism. However, biologists seldom intend this strong use of optimality models. One common alternative that I term the weak use simply involves the claim that an optimality model accurately represents the role of selection in bringing about the outcome. This and other weaker uses of optimality models insulate the optimality approach from criticisms of adaptationism, and they account for the prominence of optimality modeling (broadly construed) in population biology. The centrality of these uses of optimality models ensures a continuing role for the optimality approach, regardless of the fate of adaptationism.
KeywordsAdaptationism Behavioral ecology Evolution Natural selection Optimality modeling Population biology
This paper has benefitted from the insights of Elliott Sober, Joan Roughgarden and the members of her lab, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Patrick Forber, and two anonymous referees for Biology and Philosophy.
- Godfrey-Smith P (2001) Three kinds of adaptationism. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and optimality, Cambridge studies in philosophy and biology, chap 11. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 335–357Google Scholar
- Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (1998) Evolutionary games and replicator dynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Lloyd EA (1988) The structure and confirmation of evolutionary theory. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Parker G (1970) The reproductive behavior and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae): II. The fertilization rate and the spatial and temporal relationships of each sex around the site of mating and oviposition. J Anim Ecol 39(1):205–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reznick D, Travis J (1996) The empirical study of adaptation in natural populations, chap 8. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 243–289Google Scholar
- Seger J, Stubblefield JW (1996) Optimization and adaptation. In: Rose M, Lauder G (eds) Adaptation, chap 3. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 93–123Google Scholar