Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 587–589 | Cite as

Underlying heterogeneity: a problem for biological, philosophical, and other analyses of heritability?

  • Peter TaylorEmail author
Article
  • 75 Downloads

Claims that some human trait, say, IQ test score at age 18, show high heritability derive from analysis of data from relatives. For example, the similarity of monozygotic twins (which share all their genes) can be compared with the similarity of dizygotic twins (which do not share all their genes). The more that the former quantity exceeds the latter, the higher the trait’s “heritability.” Researchers and commentators often describe such calculations as showing how much a trait is “heritable” or “genetic.” However, no genes or measurable, transmissable genetic factors (e.g., alleles, tandem repeats, chromosomal inversions) are examined in deriving heritability estimates, nor does the method of analysis suggest where to look for them. Moreover, even if the similarity among twins or a set of close relatives is associated with similarity of yet-to-be-identified genetic factors, the factors may not be the same from one set of relatives to the next, or from one situation to the next. In...

Keywords

Heritability Estimate Underlying Factor High Heritability Selective Breeding Dizygotic Twin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This letter is based on research supported by the National Science Foundation under grant SES-0634744.

References

  1. Davey-Smith G, Ebrahim S (2007) Mendelian randomization: genetic variants as instruments for strengthening causal influences in observational studies. In: Weinstein M, Vaupel JW, Wachter KW (eds) Biosocial surveys. National Academies Press, Washington, pp 336–366Google Scholar
  2. Downes SM (2004) Heredity and heritability. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heredity/. Viewed 11 May 2006
  3. Khoury MJ, Little J, Gwinn M, Ioannidis JP (2007) On the synthesis and interpretation of consistent but weak gene-disease associations in the era of genome-wide association studies. Int J Epidemiol 36:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Rutter M (2005) Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62(5):473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2002) Genetics and human behavior: the ethical context. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org. Viewed 22 June 2007
  6. Rutter M (2002) Nature, nurture, and development: from evangelism through science toward policy and practice. Child Dev 73(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Taylor P (2006) Heterogeneity and heritability: responses from sociology, philosophy, and history of science. http://www.faculty.umb.edu/pjt/4S06.html. Viewed 17 February 2008

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Programs in Science, Technology & Values and Critical & Creative ThinkingUniversity of MassachusettsBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations