Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 417–423 | Cite as

As nature intended

Review of J. Scott Turner (2007), The Tinkerer’s Accomplice: How Design Emerges from Life Itself. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 282 pp, Hbk £18.95/$27.95
  • Tim Lewens
Article
  • 107 Downloads

Bernard machines

In J. Scott Turner’s first book, The Extended Organism, he sought to persuade us that termite mounds are not merely places where termites live, they are the lungs of the termite colony.1 Generalising from this example, his goal was to demonstrate that ‘animal-built structures are properly considered organs of physiology, in principle no different from, and just as much a part of the organism as, the more conventionally defined organs such as kidneys, hearts, lungs or livers’ (Turner 2000, p. 2). The case made was a strong one, somewhat reminiscent of the case made for extended cognition in the philosophy of mind (e.g. Clark and Chalmers 1998). In terms of what termite mounds do, and how they do it, they are functionally on a par with organs internal to canonical organisms. The facts that a termite mound is external to any individual termite, and that its respiratory function is shared by many termites, are arbitrary grounds on which to deny that it is a bona-fide...

References

  1. Clark A, Chalmers D (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58: 10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hume D (1990) Dialogues concerning natural religion. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Maynard Smith J, Szathmary E (1997) The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Michod R (1999) Darwinian dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  5. Richards R (1987) Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Rosenblueth A, Wiener N, Bigelow J (1943) Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philos Sci 10:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Turner JS (2000) The extended organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations