Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 115–128 | Cite as

Sexual selection and mate choice in evolutionary psychology

  • Chris Haufe
Article

Abstract

The importance of mate choice and sexual selection has been emphasized by the majority of evolutionary psychologists. This paper assesses three cases of work on mate choice and sexual selection in evolutionary psychology: David Buss on cross-cultural human mate preferences, Randy Thornhill and Steve Gangestad on the link between mate preferences and fluctuating asymmetry, and Geoffrey Miller on the role of Fisher’s runaway process in human evolution. A mixture of conceptual and empirical problems in each case highlights the general weakness of work in evolutionary psychology on these issues.

Keywords

Evolutionary psychology Mate choice Sexual selection Human evolution Mate preferences Optimality 

References

  1. Andersson MB (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.JGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold SJ (1983) Sexual selection: the interface of theory and empiricism. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 67–107Google Scholar
  3. Basolo AL (1995) Phylogenetic evidence for the role of a pre-existing bias in sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond 259(1356):307–311Google Scholar
  4. Basolo AL (1996) The phylogenetic distribution of a female preference. Syst Biol 45(3):290–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjorksten TA, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2000) What Does Sexual Trait FA Tell Us About Stress? Trends Ecol Evol 15(4):163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown JS (2001) Fit of form and function, diversity of life, and procession of life as an evolutionary game. In: Orzack S, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and Optimality. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 114–160Google Scholar
  7. Buss DM (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav Brain Sci 12(1):1–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss DM (1998) The psychology of human mate selection: exploring the complexity of the strategic repertoire. In: Crawford C, Krebs D (eds) Handbook of evolutionary psychology: ideas, issues, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., pp 405–429Google Scholar
  9. Buss DM (2003) The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Earman J (1992) Bayes or bust?: a critical examination of bayesian confirmation theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  11. Endler JA (1992) Signals signal conditions and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist 139(SUPPL):s125–s153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Enquist M, Arak A (1994) Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 372(6502):169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R (1997) The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evol Hum Behav 18(2):69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grafen A (1990a) Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol 144:517–546Google Scholar
  16. Grafen A (1990b) Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol 144:473–516Google Scholar
  17. Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate Choice. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  18. Heisler L, Andersson M, Arnold SJ, Boake CRB, Borgia G, Hausfater G, Kirkpatrick M, Lande R, Maynard Smith J, O’Donald P, Thornhill R, Weissing F (1987) The evolution of mating preferences and sexually selected traits: group report. In: Bradbury J, Andersson M (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York, pp 96–118Google Scholar
  19. Herre EA, Machado CA, West SA (2001) Selective regime and fig wasp sex ratios: toward sorting rigor from pseudo-rigor in tests of adaptation. In: Orzack S, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 191–218Google Scholar
  20. Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirkpatrick M (1987) The evolutionary forces acting on female mating preferences in polygynous animals. In: Bradbury J, Andersson M (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York, pp 67–82Google Scholar
  22. Kirkpatrick M (1996) Good genes and direct selection in the evolution of mating preferences. Evolution 50(6):2125–2140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350(6313):33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitcher P (1985) Vaulting ambition: sociobiology and the quest for human nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  25. Kokko H, Brooks R, McNamara JM, Houston AI (2002) The sexual selection continuum. Proc R Soc Lond—Series B: Biol Sci 269(1498):1331–1340Google Scholar
  26. Kruuk LEB, Slate J, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (2003) Fluctuating asymmetry in a secondary sexual trait: no associations with individual fitness, environmental stress or inbreeding, and no heritability. J Evol Biol 16(1):101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on poly genic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78(6):3721–3725Google Scholar
  28. Lewontin RC (1974) The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller GF (2000) The mating mind: how sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Orzack SH, Sober E (1994) Optimality models and the test of adaptationism. Am Nat 143(3):361–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parker G, Maynard Smith J (1990) Optimization theory in evolutionary biology. Nature 348:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ryan MJ (1990) Sexual selection, sensory systems, and sensory exploitation. In: Futuyma D, Antonovics J (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 157–195Google Scholar
  34. Ryan MJ (1994) Mechanisms underlying sexual selection. In: Real L (1994). Behavioral mechanisms in evolutionary ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 190–215Google Scholar
  35. Servedio MR, Kirkpatrick M (1996) The evolution of mate choice copying by indirect selection. Am Nat 148(5):848–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Center for Philosophy of BiologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations