Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 27–45 | Cite as

Propagating organization: an enquiry

  • Stuart Kauffman
  • Robert K. Logan
  • Robert Este
  • Randy Goebel
  • David Hobill
  • Ilya Shmulevich
Article

Abstract

Our aim in this article is to attempt to discuss propagating organization of process, a poorly articulated union of matter, energy, work, constraints and that vexed concept, “information”, which unite in far from equilibrium living physical systems. Our hope is to stimulate discussions by philosophers of biology and biologists to further clarify the concepts we discuss here. We place our discussion in the broad context of a “general biology”, properties that might well be found in life anywhere in the cosmos, freed from the specific examples of terrestrial life after 3.8 billion years of evolution. By placing the discussion in this wider, if still hypothetical, context, we also try to place in context some of the extant discussion of information as intimately related to DNA, RNA and protein transcription and translation processes. While characteristic of current terrestrial life, there are no compelling grounds to suppose the same mechanisms would be involved in any life form able to evolve by heritable variation and natural selection. In turn, this allows us to discuss at least briefly, the focus of much of the philosophy of biology on population genetics, which, of course, assumes DNA, RNA, proteins, and other features of terrestrial life. Presumably, evolution by natural selection—and perhaps self-organization—could occur on many worlds via different causal mechanisms. Here we seek a non-reductionist explanation for the synthesis, accumulation, and propagation of information, work, and constraint, which we hope will provide some insight into both the biotic and abiotic universe, in terms of both molecular self reproduction and the basic work energy cycle where work is the constrained release of energy into a few degrees of freedom. The typical requirement for work itself is to construct those very constraints on the release of energy that then constitute further work. Information creation, we argue, arises in two ways: first information as natural selection assembling the very constraints on the release of energy that then constitutes work and the propagation of organization. Second, information in a more extended sense is “semiotic”, that is about the world or internal state of the organism and requires appropriate response. The idea is to combine ideas from biology, physics, and computer science, to formulate explanatory hypotheses on how information can be captured and rendered in the expected physical manifestation, which can then participate in the propagation of the organization of process in the expected biological work cycles to create the diversity in our observable biosphere. Our conclusions, to date, of this enquiry suggest a foundation which views information as the construction of constraints, which, in their physical manifestation, partially underlie the processes of evolution to dynamically determine the fitness of organisms within the context of a biotic universe.

Keywords

Propagating organization Constraints Information Shannon Work Semiosis Adjacent possible 

References

  1. Apter MJ, Wolpert L (1965) Cybernetics and development. I. Information theory. J Theor Biol 8:244–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hayle K (1999) The condition of virtuality. In: Peter L (ed) The digital dialectic. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Hood L, Galas D (2003) The digital code of DNA. Nature 421:444–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kauffman S (1993) The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Kauffman S (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Kauffman S (2006) The third culture beyond reductionism: reinventing the sacred. Edge.org, November 20, 2006Google Scholar
  7. Kauffman S, Clayton P (2006) On emergence, agency, and organization. Biol Philos 21:501–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee DH, Severin K, Reza Ghadiri M (1997a) Autocatalytic networks: the transition from molecular self-replication to molecular ecosystems. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1:491–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee DH, Severin K, Yokobayashi Y, Reza Ghadiri M (1997b) Emergence of symbiosis in peptide self-replication through a hypercyclic network. Nature 390:591–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Logan RK (2006) The extended mind model of the origin of language and culture. In Nathalie G, Jean P, Van B, Diederik A (eds) Evolutionary epistemology, language and culture. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  11. Logan RK (2007) The extended mind: the origin of language and culture. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  12. Mavelli F, Luisi PL (1996) Autopoietic self-reproducing vesicles: a simplified kinetic model. J Phys Chem 100:16600–16607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maynard SJ (2000a) The concept of information in biology. Philos Sci 67:177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maynard SJ (2000b) Reply to commentaries. Philos Sci 67:214–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Monod J (1971) Chance and necessity. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramo P, Kessel J, Yli O (2006) Perturbation avalanches and criticality in gene regulatory networks. J Theor Biol 242(1):164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schrödinger E (1992) What is life? Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Serra R, Kessell J, Semeria A (2004) Genetic network models and statistical properties of gene expression data in knock-out experiments. J Theor Biol 227(1):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Technical J 27:379–423, 623–656Google Scholar
  20. Shiryayev AN (ed) (1993) Selected works of A.N. Kolmogorov, vol III, Information theory and the theory of algorithms (mathematics and its applications). Kluwer Academic Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Shmulevich I, Kauffman SA, Aldana M (2005) Eukaryotic cells are dynamically ordered or critical but not chaotic. PNAS 102: 13439–13444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sievers D, von Kiedrowski G (1994) Self-replication of complementary nucleotide-based oligomers. Nature 369:221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Silberstein M (2003) Reduction, emergence and explanation. In: Peter M, Michael S (eds) The Blackwell guide of the philosophy of science. Blackwell Publishing, Williston, VTGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith E, Harold M (2004) Universality in intermediary metabolism. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper. http://www.santafe.edu/research/publications/workingpapers/04-07-024.pdfGoogle Scholar
  25. Sterelny K, Griffiths PE (1999) Sex and death. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart Kauffman
    • 1
  • Robert K. Logan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert Este
    • 1
  • Randy Goebel
    • 3
  • David Hobill
    • 4
  • Ilya Shmulevich
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute for Biocomplexity and InformaticsUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  4. 4.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  5. 5.Institute for Systems BiologySeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations