In responding to three reviews of Evolution in Four Dimensions (Jablonka and Lamb, 2005, MIT Press), we briefly consider the historical background to the present genecentred view of evolution, especially the way in which Weismann’s theories have influenced it, and discuss the origins of the notion of epigenetic inheritance. We reaffirm our belief that all types of hereditary information—genetic, epigenetic, behavioural and cultural—have contributed to evolutionary change, and outline recent evidence, mainly from epigenetic studies, that suggests that non-DNA heritable variations are not rare and can be quite stable. We describe ways in which such variations may have influenced evolution. The approach we take leads to broader definitions of terms such as ‘units of heredity’, ‘units of evolution’, and ‘units of selection’, and we maintain that ‘information’ can be a useful concept if it is defined in terms of its effects on the receiver. Although we agree that evolutionary theory is not undergoing a Kuhnian revolution, the incorporation of new data and ideas about hereditary variation, and about the role of development in generating it, is leading to a version of Darwinism that is very different from the gene-centred one that dominated evolutionary thinking in the second half of the twentieth century.
Epigenetic inheritance Cultural evolution Inherited variation Information Modern synthesis Neo-Darwinism Waddington Weismannism
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Adams KL, Cronn R, Percifield R, Wendel JF (2003) Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:4649–4654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK (2005) Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308:1466–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avital E, Jablonka E (2000) Animal traditions: behavioural inheritance in evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Bateman RM, DiMichele WA (2002) Generating and filtering major phenotypic novelties: neoGoldschmidtian saltation revisited. In: Cronk QCB, Bateman RM, Hawkins JA (eds) Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 109–159Google Scholar
Bennett-Baker PE, Wilkowski J, Burke DT (2003) Age-associated activation of epigenetically repressed genes in the mouse. Genetics 165:2055–2062Google Scholar
Griesemer JR, Wimsatt WC (1989) Picturing Weismannism: a case study of conceptual evolution. In: Ruse M (ed) What the philosophy of biology is: essays dedicated to David Hull. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 75–137Google Scholar
Haig D (2004) The (dual) origin of epigenetics. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quantitative Biol 69:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar