Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 453–472

The expanded evolutionary synthesis—a response to Godfrey-Smith, Haig, and West-Eberhard

Article

Abstract

In responding to three reviews of Evolution in Four Dimensions (Jablonka and Lamb, 2005, MIT Press), we briefly consider the historical background to the present genecentred view of evolution, especially the way in which Weismann’s theories have influenced it, and discuss the origins of the notion of epigenetic inheritance. We reaffirm our belief that all types of hereditary information—genetic, epigenetic, behavioural and cultural—have contributed to evolutionary change, and outline recent evidence, mainly from epigenetic studies, that suggests that non-DNA heritable variations are not rare and can be quite stable. We describe ways in which such variations may have influenced evolution. The approach we take leads to broader definitions of terms such as ‘units of heredity’, ‘units of evolution’, and ‘units of selection’, and we maintain that ‘information’ can be a useful concept if it is defined in terms of its effects on the receiver. Although we agree that evolutionary theory is not undergoing a Kuhnian revolution, the incorporation of new data and ideas about hereditary variation, and about the role of development in generating it, is leading to a version of Darwinism that is very different from the gene-centred one that dominated evolutionary thinking in the second half of the twentieth century.

Keywords

Epigenetic inheritance Cultural evolution Inherited variation Information Modern synthesis Neo-Darwinism Waddington Weismannism 

References

  1. Adams KL, Cronn R, Percifield R, Wendel JF (2003) Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:4649–4654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK (2005) Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308:1466–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avital E, Jablonka E (2000) Animal traditions: behavioural inheritance in evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateman RM, DiMichele WA (2002) Generating and filtering major phenotypic novelties: neoGoldschmidtian saltation revisited. In: Cronk QCB, Bateman RM, Hawkins JA (eds) Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 109–159Google Scholar
  5. Bennett-Baker PE, Wilkowski J, Burke DT (2003) Age-associated activation of epigenetically repressed genes in the mouse. Genetics 165:2055–2062Google Scholar
  6. Chong S, Whitelaw E (2004) Epigenetic germline inheritance. Curr Opin Genet Develop 14:692–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cronk QCB (2001) Plant evolution and development in a post-genomic context. Nat Rev Genet 2:607–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vries H (1906) The origin of the peloric toad-flax. Chapter 16 of Species and varieties, their origin by mutation. 2nd edn. Open Court, Chicago, pp 459–487Google Scholar
  9. Drake JW, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow JF (1998) Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148:1667–1686Google Scholar
  10. Fragaszy DM, Perry S (2003) The biology of traditions: models and evidence. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcia-Fernàndez J (2005) The genesis and evolution of homeobox gene clusters, Nat Rev Genet 6:881–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gluckman P, Hansen M (2005) The fetal matrix: Evolution, development and disease. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Grant-Downton RT, Dickinson HG (2005) Epigenetics and its implications for plant biology. 1. The epigenetic network in plants. Annl Bot 96:1143–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant-Downton RT, Dickinson HG (2006) Epigenetics and its implications for plant biology. 2. The ‘epigenetic epiphany’: epigenetics, evolution and beyond. Annl Bot 97:11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griesemer JR (2002) What is “epi” about epigenetics? Annl NY Acad Sci 981:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griesemer JR, Wimsatt WC (1989) Picturing Weismannism: a case study of conceptual evolution. In: Ruse M (ed) What the philosophy of biology is: essays dedicated to David Hull. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 75–137Google Scholar
  17. Haig D (2004) The (dual) origin of epigenetics. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quantitative Biol 69:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holliday R (1987) The inheritance of epigenetic defects. Science 238:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holliday R (2006) Epigenetics: a historical overview. Epigenetics 1:76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jablonka E (2002) Information: its interpretation, its inheritance, and its sharing. Philos Sci 69:578–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jablonka E (2004) From replicators to heritably varying phenotypic traits: the extended phenotype revisited. Biol Philos 19:353–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (1995) Epigenetic inheritance and evolution: the Lamarckian dimension. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2002) The changing concept of epigenetics. Annl NY Acad Sci 981:82–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2006) The evolution of information in the major transitions. J Theoret Biol 239:236–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johannsen W (1911) The genotype conception of heredity. Am Nat 45:129–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kidwell MG, Lisch D (1997) Transposable elements as sources of variation in animals and plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7704–7711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lachmann M, Jablonka E (1996) The inheritance of phenotypes: an adaptation to fluctuating environments. J Theoret Biol 181:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levy AA, Feldman M (2004) Genetic and epigenetic reprogramming of the wheat genome upon allopolyploidization. Biol J Linnean Soc 82:607–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lolle SJ, Victor JL, Young JM, Pruitt RE (2005) Genome-wide non-mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic information in Arabidopsis. Nature 434:505–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maynard Smith J (2000) The concept of information in biology. Philos Sci 67:177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Freeman, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Meaney MJ (2001) Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annl Rev Neurosci 24:1161–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nanney DL (1958) Epigenetic control systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 44:712–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oyama S (1985) The ontogeny of information: developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Rapp RA, Wendel JF (2005) Epigenetics and plant evolution. New Phytol 168:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rassoulzadegan M, Grandjean V, Gounon P, Vincent S, Gillot I, Cuzin F (2006) RNA-mediated non-mendelian inheritance of an epigenetic change in the mouse. Nature 441:469–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Richards EJ (2006) Inherited epigenetic variation—revisiting soft inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 7:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  39. Roberts BT, Wickner RB (2003) Heritable activity: a prion that propagates by covalent autoactivation. Genes Develop 17:2083–2087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodin SN, Parkhomchuk DV, Riggs AD (2005) Epigenetic changes and repositioning determine the evolutionary fate of duplicated genes. Biochemistry (Moscow) 70:559–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Romanes GJ (1888) Lamarckism versus Darwinism. Nature 38:413Google Scholar
  42. Romanes GJ (1893) An examination of Weismannism. Longmans, Green, & Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Rudall PJ, Bateman RM (2003) Evolutionary change in flowers and inflorescences: evidence from naturally occurring terata. Trends Plant Sci 8:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simpson GG (1949) The meaning of evolution. Yale University Press, NewhavenGoogle Scholar
  45. Simpson GG (1960) The world into which Darwin led us. Science 131:966–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stam M, Mittelsten-Scheid O (2005) Paramutation: an encounter leaving a lasting impression. Trends Plant Sci 10:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Takeda S, Paszkowski J (2006) DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis. Chromosoma 115:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vrana PB, Fossella JA, Matteson P, del Rio T, O’Neill MJ, Tilghman SM (2000) Genetic and epigenetic incompatibilities underlie hybrid dysgenesis in Peromyscus. Nat Genet 25:120–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Waddington CH (1957) The strategy of the genes. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Waddington CH (1975) The evolutionist of an evolutionist. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  51. Weaver ICG, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D’Alessio AC, Sharma S, Seckl JR, Dymov S, Szyf M, Meaney MJ (2004) Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci 7:847–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weismann A (1893). The Germ-plasm: a theory of heredity (trans. by Parker W.N. and Rönnfeldt H.). Walter Scott, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Weismann A (1902) On germinal selection as a source of definite variation, 2nd edn (trans. McCormack T.J.). Open Court, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  54. West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Wickner RB, Edskes HK, Ross ED, Pierce MM, Baxa U, Brachmann A, Shewmaker F (2004) Prion genetics: new rules for a new kind of gene. Annl Rev Genet 38:681–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilson EB (1900) The cell in development and inheritance. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Winther RG (2001) August Weismann on germ-plasm variation. J History Biol 34:517–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zilberman D, Henikoff S (2005) Epigenetic inheritance in Arabidopsis: selective silence. Curr Opin Genet Develop 15:557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and IdeasTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.LondonUK

Personalised recommendations