Is it a revolution?
- 221 Downloads
Jablonka and Lamb's claim that evolutionary biology is undergoing a ‘revolution’ is queried. But the very concept of revolutionary change has uncertain application to a field organized in the manner of contemporary biology. The explanatory primacy of sequence properties is also discussed.
KeywordsInheritance Evolution Central Dogma Epigenetics Revolution
- Godfrey-Smith P (2003) Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Jablonka E, Lamb M (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Kuhn TS (1970) Structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Olby Robert (1994) The path to the double helix (enlarged edition). Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD (eds) (2001) Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Richerson P, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Sterelny K (2004) Symbiosis, evolvability and modularity. In: G. Schlosser and G. Wagner (eds) Modularity in development and evolution. University of Chicago Press, pp 490–516Google Scholar
- Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
- Toulmin S (1970) Does the distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water? In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 39–47Google Scholar
- Waters CK (2000) Molecules made biological. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4(214): 539–564Google Scholar