Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 1–25

Biological Levers and Extended Adaptationism

Article

Abstract

Two critiques of simple adaptationism are distinguished: anti-adaptationism and extended adaptationism. Adaptationists and anti-adaptationists share the presumption that an evolutionary explanation should identify the dominant simple cause of the evolutionary outcome to be explained. A consideration of extended-adaptationist models such as coevolution, niche construction and extended phenotypes reveals the inappropriateness of this presumption in explaining the evolution of certain important kinds of features—those that play particular roles in the regulation of organic processes, especially behavior. These biological or behavioral ‘levers’ are distinctively available for adaptation and exaptation by their possessors and for co-optation by other organisms. As a result they are likely to result from a distinctive and complex type of evolutionary process that conforms neither to simple adaptationist nor to anti-adaptationist styles of explanation. Many of the human features whose evolutionary explanation is most controversial belong to this category, including the female orgasm.

Keywords

Adaptation Adaptationism Exaptation Regulation Feedback Coevolution Niche construction Extended phenotype Evolutionary explanation 

References

  1. Alcock J (1987) Ardent adaptationism. Nat Hist 96(4):4Google Scholar
  2. Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Barash DP (2005) Let a thousand orgasms bloom! a review of the case of the female orgasm by Elisabeth A. Lloyd. Evol Psychol 3:347–354Google Scholar
  4. Barber I, Hoare D, Krause J (2000) Effects of parasites on fish behaviour: A review and evolutionary perspective. Rev Fish Biol Fish 10:131–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bateson P (1988) The active role of behaviour in evolution. In: Ho M-W, Fox SW (eds) Evolutionary processes and metaphors. Wiley, New York, pp 191–207Google Scholar
  6. Bernard C (1865) An introduction to the study of experimental medicine, English translation Greene HC (trans.) 1927. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowlby J (1969/1997) Attachment, vol 1 of Attachment and loss. Pimlico, London. Reprint of Hogarth, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowlby J (1977) The making and breaking of affectional bonds. Br J Psychiatry 130:201–210; 421–431Google Scholar
  9. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss LW (1987) The evolution of individuality. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  12. Cziko G (2000) The things we do: using the lessons of Bernard and Darwin to understand the what, how, and why of our behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawkins R (1986) The blind watchmaker. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawkins R (2004) Extended phenotype – but not too extended. A reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka. Biol Philos 19:377–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Day RL, Laland KN, Odling-Smee J (2003) Rethinking adaptation: the niche-construction perspective. Perspect Biol Med [Chicago] 46(1):80–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Dicke M, van Poecke RMP (2002) Signalling in plant-insect interactions: signal transduction in direct and indirect plant defence. In: Scheel D, Wasternack C (eds) Plant signal transduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 289–316Google Scholar
  19. Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18:586–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferguson BF, Mathesius U (2003) Signaling interactions during nodule development. J Plant Growth Regul 22:47–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher J, Hinde RA (1949) The opening of milk bottles by birds. Br Birds 42:347–357Google Scholar
  22. Futuyma DJ, Slatkin M (eds) (1983) Coevolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Godfrey-Smith P (2001) Three kinds of adaptationism. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 335–357Google Scholar
  24. Gould SJ (1987) Freudian slip. Nat Hist 96(2):14–21Google Scholar
  25. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist program. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, vol 205, pp 581–598, reprinted in Sober E (ed) 1994, Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 73–90Google Scholar
  26. Gould SJ, Vrba E (1982) Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15Google Scholar
  27. Gresshoff PM, Rose RJ, Singh M, Rolfe BG (2003) Symbiosis signals. Today Life Sci May/June, 30–33Google Scholar
  28. Griffiths PE, Gray RD (1994) Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. J Philos 91(6):277–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ham JH, Bent A (2002) Recognition and defense signalling in plant/bacterial and fungal interactions. In: Scheel D, Wasternack C (eds) Plant signal transduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 198–225Google Scholar
  30. Holland J (1995) Hidden order: how adaptation builds complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. Jablonka E (2001) The systems of inheritance. In: Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD (eds) Cycles of contingency. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 99–116Google Scholar
  32. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (1995) Epigenetic inheritance and evolution: the Lamarckian dimension. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Janzen DH (1980) When is it coevolution? Evolution 34:611–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jog M, Watve M (2005) Role of parasites and commensals in shaping host behaviour. Curr Sci 89:1184–1191Google Scholar
  35. Keller EF (2002) Making sense of life: explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Laland KN (2004) Extending the extended phenotype. Biol Philos 19(3):313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laland KN, Odling-Smee FJ, Feldman MW (1996) On the evolutionary consequences of niche construction. J Evol Biol 9:293–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laland KN, Odling-Smee FJ, Feldman MW (2000) Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behav Brain Sci 23(1):131–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewontin RC (1983a) Gene, organism, and environment. In: Bendall DS (ed) Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 273–285Google Scholar
  40. Lewontin RC (1983b) The organism as the subject and object of evolution. Scientia 118:65–82Google Scholar
  41. Lewontin RC (1984) Adaptation. In: Sober E (ed) Conceptual issues in theoretical biology: an anthology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 234–251Google Scholar
  42. Lloyd EA (2005) The case of the female orgasm: bias in the science of evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  43. Maynard Smith J, Harper D (1995) Animal signals: models and terminology. J Theor Biol 177:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maynard Smith J, Szathmary E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. W.H. Freeman, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Mayr E (1983) How to carry out the adaptationist program? American Naturalist 121:324–333, reprinted in Mayr E, Towards a new philosophy of biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988, pp 149–159Google Scholar
  46. Mitchell RW, Thompson NS (1990) The effects of familiarity on dog-human play. Anthrozoos 4(1):24–43Google Scholar
  47. Mitchell RW, Thompson NS (1991) Projects, routines, and enticements in dog-human play. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer PH (eds) Perspectives in ethology, vol 9. Plenum Press, New York, pp 189–215Google Scholar
  48. Moore, J (2002) Parasites and the behavior of animals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  50. Oyama S (2000) The ontogeny of information: developmental systems and evolution, 2nd edn. Duke University Press, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  51. Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD (eds) (2001) Cycles of contingency. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  52. Plotkin HC (ed) (1988) The role of behavior in evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  53. Preston, B (1988) Why is a wing like a spoon? A pluralist theory of function. J Philos 95(5):215–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  55. Robertson DS (1991) Feedback theory and Darwinian evolution. J Theor Biol 152: 469–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scheel D, Wasternack C (2002) Signal transduction in plants: cross talk with the environment. In: Scheel D, Wasternack C (eds) Plant signal transduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  57. Schleidt WM (1998) Is humaneness canine?. Hum Ethol Bull 13:1–4Google Scholar
  58. Shah I (1972) The exploits of the incomparable Mulla Nasrudin. E.P. Dutton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Sober E, Wilson DS (1998) Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  60. Soosaar JLM, Burch-Smith TM, Dinesh-Kumar SP (2005) Mechanisms of plant resistance to viruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:789–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Symons D (1979) The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomas F, Adamo S, Moore J (2005) Parasitic manipulation: where are we, and where should we go? Behav Processes 68:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thompson JN (1995) The coevolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  64. Turner JS (2000) The extended organism: the physiology of animal-built structures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Valen L (1973) A new evolutionary law. Evol Theory 1:1–30Google Scholar
  66. Whitham SA, Dinesh-Kumar SP (2002) Signaling, in plant-virus interactions. In: Scheel D, Wasternack C (eds) Plant signal transduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 226–249Google Scholar
  67. Wiener N (1961) Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  68. Wolf JB, Brodie ED III, Cheverud JM, Moore AJ, Wade MJ (1998) Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol Evol 13(2):64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBucknell UniversityLewisburgUSA

Personalised recommendations