Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 247–266 | Cite as

The dimensions, modes and definitions of species and speciation

Article

Abstract

Speciation is an aspect of evolutionary biology that has received little philosophical attention apart from articles mainly by biologists such as Mayr (1988). The role of speciation as a terminus a quo for the individuality of species or in the context of punctuated equilibrium theory has been discussed, but not the nature of speciation events themselves. It is the task of this paper to attempt to bring speciation events into some kind of general scheme, based primarily upon the work of Sergey Gavrilets on adaptive landscapes, using migration rate, or gene flow, as the primary scale, and concluding that adaptive and drift explanations are complementary rather than competing. I propose a distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic selection, and the notion of reproductive reach and argue that speciation modes should be discriminated in terms of gene flow, the nature of selection maintaining reproductive reach, and whether the predominant cause is selective or stochastic. I also suggest that the notion of an adaptive “quasispecies” for asexual species is the primitive notion of species, and that members of reproductively coherent sexual species are additionally coadapted to their mating partners.

... evolution is a process of change or movement. Description of any movement may logically and conveniently be divided in two parts: statics, which treats of the forces producing a motion and the equilibrium of these forces, and dynamics, which deals with the motion itself and the forces producing it. Following this scheme, we shall discuss, first, the forces which may come under consideration as possible factors bringing about changes in the genetic composition of populations (evolutionary statics), and second, the interactions of these forces in race and species formation and disintegration (evolutionary dynamics).

(Dobzhansky 1937)

Keywords

Species Speciation Adaptive landscape Gavrilets 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Jonathon Kaplan for the initial discussion of Gavrilets from which this paper arose, and Sergey Gavrilets, Paul Griffiths, Stefan Linquist, Mark Colyvan, Piero Giorgio and Hugh Paterson for critical comments. An anonymous reviewer also made helpful comments that tightened up the structure of this paper. Thanks also to Kim Sterleny for providing source material, and for perceptive criticism.

References

  1. Arnold S.J., Pfrender M.E., Jones A.G. (2001). The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. Genetica 112–113:9–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlocher Stewart H. (1999). Host race or species? Allozyme characterization of the ‘flowering dogwood fly’, a member of the Rhagoletis pomonella complex. Heredity 83(6):652–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlocher Stewart H. (2000). Radiation and divergence in the Rhagoletis pomonella species group: inferences from allozymes. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 54(2):543–557Google Scholar
  4. Berlocher Stewart H., Feder J.L. (2002). Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:773–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd R. (1999a). Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Wilson R. (eds), Species, New Interdisciplinary Essays. Bradford/MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd R. (1999b) Kinds, complexity and multiple realization. Philos. Studies 95(1–2):67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Catzeflis F.M., Nevo E., Ahlquist J.E., Sibley C.G. (1989). Relationships of the chromosomal species in the Eurasian mole rats of the Spalax ehrenbergi group as determined by DNA–DNA hybridization, and an estimate of the spalacid-murid divergence time. J. Mol. Evol. 29(3):223–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohan F.M. (2002). What are bacterial species? Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56:457–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohan F.M. (2001). Bacterial species and speciation. Syst. Biol. 50(4):513–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coyne J.A., H.A. Orr (2004). Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MassGoogle Scholar
  11. Cullum A.J. (1997). Comparisons of physiological performance in sexual and asexual whiptail lizards (genus Cnemidophorus): Implications for the role of heterozygosity. Am. Nat. 150(1):24–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cullum A.J. (2000). Phenotypic variability of physiological traits in populations of sexual and asexual whiptail lizards (genus Cnemidophorus). Evol. Ecol. Res. 2(7):841–855Google Scholar
  13. de Queiroz K. (1998) The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation. In: Howard D.J., Berlocher S.H. (eds), Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobzhansky T. (1935). A critique of the species concept in biology. Philos. Sci. 2:344–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobzhansky T. (1937). Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Dowling T.E., C.L. Secor. (1997). The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:593–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eigen M. 1993. Viral quasispecies. Scientific Am. July 1993 32–39Google Scholar
  18. Fisher R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK (rev. ed. Dover, New York, 1958)Google Scholar
  19. Gannett L. (2003). Making populations: Bounding genes in space and in time. Philos. Sci. 70(5):989–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gärdenfors P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  21. Gavrilets S. (2003). Perspective: models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 57(10):2197–2215Google Scholar
  22. Gavrilets S., Gravner J. (1997). Percolation on the fitness hypercube and the evolution of reproductive isolation. J. Theoret. Biol. 184(1):51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gavrilets S., Waxman D. (2002). Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(16):10533–10538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gavrilets S. (2004). Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species, Monographs in Population Biology; V. 41. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  25. Hey J., W.M. Fitch, F.J. Ayala (eds) (2005) Systematics and the Origin of Species: On Ernst Mayr’s 100th Anniversary. National Academies Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Lande R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78(6):3721–3725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Littlejohn M.J. 1969. The systematic significance of isolating mechanisms. In Reflections on Systematic Biology; Proceedings of an International Conference, University of Michigan, June 14–16, 1967. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayr E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Mayr E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayr E. (1988). Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  31. Moreno E. (1997). In search of a bacterial species definition. Revista de Biologia Tropical 45(2):753–771Google Scholar
  32. Nevo E., Filippucci M.G., Beiles A. (1994a). Genetic polymorphisms in subterranean mammals (Spalax ehrenbergi superspecies) in the near east revisited: patterns and theory. Heredity 72(5):465–487Google Scholar
  33. Nevo E., Filippucci M.G., Redi C., Korol A., Beiles A. (1994b). Chromosomal speciation and adaptive radiation of mole rats in Asia Minor correlated with increased ecological stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91(17):8160–8164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paterson H.E.H. (1993). Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species. Collected Writings. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MAGoogle Scholar
  35. Poulton, E.B. 1903. What is a species? Proceedings of the Entomological Society of London: reprinted in Poulton 1908: 46–94Google Scholar
  36. Ramsey J., Schemske D.W. and Doyle J.A. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants – Phylogeny of vascular plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 467–501, 567–599Google Scholar
  37. Skipper R.A. (2002). The persistence of the R. A. Fisher–Sewall Wright controvery. Biol. Philos. 17:341–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Templeton A.R. (1998). Species and speciation: geography, population structure, ecology, and gene trees. In: Howard D.J., Berlocher S.H. (eds), Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Templeton A.R. (1989). The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic perspective. In: Otte D., Endler J. (eds), Speciation and Its Consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  40. Turelli M., N.H. Barton, J.A. Coyne (2001). Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16(7):330–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wagner M. (1868). Die Darwin’sche Theorie und das Migrationsgesetz der Organismen. Duncker & Humbolt, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  42. White M.J.D. (1978). Modes of Speciation. WH Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilkins J.S. (2003). How to be a chaste species pluralist-realist: The origins of species modes and the Synapomorphic Species Concept. Biol. Philos. 18:621–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wright S. (1932). The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. In: Jones D.F. (eds), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics. Brooklyn Botanic Garden, Brooklyn, NYGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biohumanities ProjectThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations