Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 57–72 | Cite as

Where the wild things are: environmental preservation and human nature

  • Marc EreshefskyEmail author
Article

Abstract

Environmental philosophers spend considerable time drawing the divide between humans and the rest of nature. Some argue that humans and our actions are unnatural. Others allow that humans are natural, but maintain that humans are nevertheless distinct. The motivation for distinguishing humans from the rest of nature is the desire to determine what aspects of the environment should be preserved. The standard view is that we should preserve those aspects of the environment outside of humans and our influence. This paper examines the standard view by asking two questions. First, are the suggested grounds for distinguishing humans from the rest of the environment viable? Second, is such a distinction even needed for determining what to preserve? The paper concludes that debates over whether humans are natural and whether humans are unique are unhelpful when deciding what to preserve.

Key words

Environmental preservation Human culture Human nature Human/nature dichotomy Natural Wilderness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank those that helped me write this paper. Brenda Baker, Megan Delehanty, Anya Plutynski, Kim Sterelny, and an anonymous referee provided valuable comments on earlier drafts. Clement Loo and Jennifer Runke were excellent research assistants. Audiences in Calgary, Salt Lake City, and Sydney provided helpful feedback. The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada provided financial assistance.

References

  1. Avital E. and Jablonka E. (2000). Animal Traditions: Behavioral Inheritance in Evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitken G.M. (1998). Extinction. Biology and Philosophy 13: 393–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan A. (1988). Thinking About Nature: An Investigation of Nature, Value and Ecology for the Twenty-First Century. The University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd R. and Silk J.B. (2000). How Humans Evolved, Second Edition. W.W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Callicott J.B. 1991[1998]. The Wilderness Idea Revisited: The Sustainable Development Alternative, The Environmental Professional 13: 235–247. Reprinted in: Callicott J.B. and Nelson M.P. (eds), The Great New Wilderness Debate. The University of Georgia Press. Athens, pp. 337–366.Google Scholar
  6. Callicott J.B. (1996a). Benevolent Symbiosis: The Philosophy of Conservation Reconstructed”. In: Callicott J.B. and da Rocha F.J.R. (eds) Earth Summit Ethics: Toward a Reconstructive Postmodern Philosophy of Environmental Education. State University of New York, Albany, pp. 139–160Google Scholar
  7. Callicott J.B. (1996b). ‘Do Deconstructive Ecology and Sociobiology Undermine Leopold’s Land Ethic?’. Environ. Ethics 18: 353–372Google Scholar
  8. Clark A. (1997). Being There: Putting the Brain, Body and World Together Again. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawkins R. (2004). The Ancestor’s Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, Wellington HouseGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliot R. (1997). Faking Nature. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrlich P.R. (2000). Human Natures: Genes, Cultures, and the Human Prospect. Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Gould S.J. (1989). Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of Natural History. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenfield P. and Savage-Rambaugh K. 1990. Grammatical combination in Pan Paniscus: Processes of learning and invention in the evolution and development of language. In: Parker S. and Gibson K. (eds), ``Language'' and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 540–578Google Scholar
  14. Griffiths P.E., Stotz K. (2000). How the Mind Grows: A Developmental Perspective on the Biology of Cognition. Synthese 122: 29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hettinger N, Throp B. (1999). Refocusing ecocentrism: de-emphasizing stability and defending wilderness. Environ. Ethics 21: 3–21Google Scholar
  16. Katz E. (1997). The big lie: human restoration of nature. In: Katz E. (eds) Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and Natural Community. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 93–107Google Scholar
  17. Lewontin R.C. 1983[2001], Gene, organism and environment, In Bendall D.S. (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, pp. 273–285. Reprinted in: Oyama S., Griffiths P.E. and Gray R.D. (eds), Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution. MIT Press. Cambridge, pp. 59–66Google Scholar
  18. Mercader J., Panger M. and Boesch C. (2002). Excavation of chimpanzee stone tool site in the African rainforest. Science 296:1452–1455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Norton B. (1986). Epilogue. In: Norton B.G. (eds), The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity. Princeton University Press. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  20. Odling-Smee F., Laland K., Feldman M. (2003). Comments on Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Primack R. (1993). Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinaur Associates, Sunderland, MassGoogle Scholar
  22. Ridley M. (1993). Evolution. Blackwell Scientific Publications, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Rolston H., III (1989). Philosophy Gone Wild. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Rolston H. III 1991[1998]. The Wilderness Idea Reaffirmed, Environmental Professional 13: 371–378. Reprinted in: Callicott J.B and Nelson M.P. (eds), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Georgia University Press. Athens, pp. 367–386Google Scholar
  25. Rolston H., III, (1994). Conserving Natural Value. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Sober E. (1980). ‘Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism’. Philosophy of Science 47: 350–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sober E. (1986). Philosophical problems for environmentalism. In: Norton B.G. (eds), The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Sterelny K. (2003). Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition. Blackwell, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  29. Tattersall I. (1998). Becoming Human. Evolution and Human Uniqueness. Harcourt Brace, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor P.W. (1986). Respect for Nature. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Woods, M. forthcoming: Rethinking Wilderness. Broadview Press: Peterborough, ONGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations