Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 989–1010 | Cite as

Maynard Smith on the levels of selection question



The levels of selection problem was central to Maynard Smith’s work throughout his career. This paper traces Maynard Smith’s views on the levels of selection, from his objections to group selection in the 1960s to his concern with the major evolutionary transitions in the 1990s. The relations between Maynard Smith’s position and those of Hamilton and G.C. Williams are explored, as is Maynard Smith’s dislike of the Price equation approach to multi-level selection. Maynard Smith’s account of the ‘core Darwinian principles’ is discussed, as is his debate with Sober and Wilson (1998) over the status of trait-group models, and his attitude to the currently fashionable concept of pluralism about the levels of selection.


Altruism Evolutionary transitions Group selection Individuality Kin selection Levels of selection Pluralism Price’s equation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold A.J. and Fristrup K. (1982). The theory of evolution by natural selection: a hierarchical expansion. Paleobiology 8:113–129Google Scholar
  2. Avital E. and Jablonka E. (2000). Animal Traditions: Behavioural Inheritance in Evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Buss L. (1987). The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Damuth J. and Heisler I.L. (1988). Alternative formulations of multi-level selection. Biol. Philos. 3:407–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawkins R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawkins R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Dugatkin L.A. and Reeve H.K. (1994). Behavioural ecology and levels of selection: dissolving the group selection controversy. Adv. Study Behav. 23:101–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eigen M. and Schuster P. (1979). The Hypercycle, a Principle of Natural Self-Organization. Berlin, Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  9. Eigen M., Schuster P., Gardiner W. and Winkler-Oswatitsch R. (1981). The Origin of Genetic Information. Sci. Am. 244(4):78–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank S.A. (1995). George Price’s Contribution to Evolutionary Genetics. J. Theor. Biol. 175:373–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank S.A. (1998). Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Gould S.J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Grafen A. (1985). A Geometric View of Relatedness. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 2:28–89Google Scholar
  14. Griesemer J. (2000). The units of evolutionary transition. Selection 1:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton W.D. (1963). The evolution of altruistic behaviour. Am. Nat. 97:354–356, reprinted in Hamilton (1996), 6–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton W.D. (1964). The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour I. J. Theor. Biol. 7:1–16, reprinted in Hamilton (1996), 31–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton W.D. (1970). Selfish and Spiteful Behaviour in an Evolutionary Model. Nature 228:1218–1220, reprinted in Hamilton (1996), 177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton W.D. 1975a. Innate social aptitudes in man: an approach from evolutionary genetics, reprinted in R. Fox (ed.) Biosocial Anthropology. Wiley, New York, pp. 133–155, reprinted in Hamilton (1996), 315–352Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton W.D. (1975b). Gamblers since life began: barnacles, aphids, elms. Q. Rev. Biol. 50:175–180, reprinted in Hamilton (1996), 357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton W.D. (1996). Narrow Roads of Gene Land Volume 1: Evolution of Social Behaviour. New York, W.H. FreemanGoogle Scholar
  21. Hull D. (1981). Units of evolution: a metaphysical essay. In: Jensen U.J. and Harré R. (eds). The Philosophy of Evolution. Brighton, Harvester Press, pp. 23–44Google Scholar
  22. Kerr B. and Godfrey-Smith P. (2002). Individualist and multi-level perspectives on selection in structured populations. Biol. Philos. 17:477–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kerr B., Neuhauser C., Bohannan B.J.M. and Dean A.M. (forthcoming). Local Migration Promotes Competitive Restraint in a Host-Pathogen ‘Tragedy of the Commons’Google Scholar
  24. Lack D. (1966). Population Studies of Birds. Oxford, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewontin R.C. (1970). The units of selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maynard Smith J. (1964). Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201:1145–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maynard Smith J. (1976). Group selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 61:277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maynard Smith J. (1978). The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Maynard Smith J. (1979). Hypercycles and the origin of life. Nature 20:445–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maynard Smith J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Maynard Smith J. (1983). Game theory and the evolution of cooperation. In: Bendall D.S. (eds). Evolution from Molecules to Man. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 445–456Google Scholar
  32. Maynard Smith J. (1984). Paleontology at the high table. Nature 309:401–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maynard Smith J. (1987). How to model evolution. In: Dupré J. (eds). The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Cambridge MA, MIT Press, pp. 119–131Google Scholar
  34. Maynard Smith J. (1988a). Evolutionary progress and the levels of selection. In: Nitecki M.H. (eds). Evolutionary Progress. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 219–230Google Scholar
  35. Maynard Smith J. (1988b). Selection for recombination in a polygenic model – the mechanism. Genet. Res. 51:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maynard Smith J. (1988c). ‘Current Controversies in Evolutionary Biology’, in Did Darwin Get it Right?. New York, Chapman-HallGoogle Scholar
  37. Maynard Smith J. (1991). A Darwinian view of symbiosis. In: Margulis L. and Fester R. (eds). Symbiosis as a Source of Evolutionary Innovation. Cambridge MA, MIT Press, pp. 26–39Google Scholar
  38. Maynard Smith J. (1998). The origin of altruism. Nature 393:639–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maynard Smith J. (2002). Commentary on Kerr and Godfrey-Smith. Biol. Philos. 17(4):523–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maynard Smith J. and Price G.R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maynard Smith J. and Szathmáry E. (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Michod R.E. (1999). Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  43. Nunney L. (1985). Group selection, altruism, and structured-deme models. Am. Nat. 126:212–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Okasha S. (2001). Why won’t the group selection controversy go away?. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 52(1):25–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Okasha S. (2004). Multi-level selection and the partitioning of covariance: a comparison of three approaches. Evolution 58(3):486–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Okasha S. (2006a). Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford, Oxford University Press (in press)Google Scholar
  47. Okasha S. 2006b. Multi-level Selection and the Major Transitions in Evolution, Philosophy of Science (Proceedings of the 2004 PSA) (in press)Google Scholar
  48. Price G.R. (1972). Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Ann. Hum. Genet. 35:485–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Price G.R. (1995). The nature of selection. J. Theor. Biol. 175:389–396 (written circa 1971)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Queller D.C. (1992). Quantitative genetics, inclusive fitness, and group selection. Am. Nat. 139:540–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Segersträle U. (2000). Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  52. Sober E. (1984). The Nature of Selection. Chicago, Chicago University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Sober E. and Lewontin R. (1982). Artifact, cause and genic selection. Philos. Sci. 49:157–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sober E. and Wilson D.S. (1998). Unto Others: the Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge MA, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  55. Szathmáry E. and Hammerstein P. (2004). John Maynard Smith (1920–2004). Nature 429:258–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Szathmáry E. and Maynard Smith J. (1997). From replicators to reproducers: the first major transitions leading to life. J. Theor. Biol. 187:555–571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Uyenoyama M. and Feldman M.W. (1980). Theories of Kin and group selection: a population genetics perspective. Theor. Popul. Biol. 17:380–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wade M. (1985). Soft selection, hard selection, kin selection, and group selection. Am. Nat. 125:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams G.C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams G.C. (1992). Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, Challenges. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson D.S. (1975). A theory of group selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 7(2):143–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson D.S. (1980). The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities. Menlo Park CA, Benjamin/CummingsGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilson D.S. (1987). Altruism in Mendelian populations derived from sibling groups: the haystack model revisited. Evolution 41:1059–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wright S. (1980). Genic and organismic selection. Evolution 34:825–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wynne-Edwards V.C. (1962). Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour. Edinburgh, Oliver and BoydGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations