The new nativism: a commentary on Gary Marcus’s The birth of the mind
- 116 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
Gary Marcus (2004) has written a very interesting book about mental development from a nativist perspective. For the general readership at which the book is largely aimed, it will be interesting because of its many informative examples of the development of cognitive structures and because of its illuminating explanations of ways in which genes can contribute to these developmental processes. However, the book is also interesting from a theoretical point of view. Marcus tries to make nativism compatible with the central arguments that anti-nativists use to attack nativism and with many recent discoveries about genetic activity and brain development. In so doing, he reconfigures the nativist position to a considerable extent. Marcus’s theory is certainly more sophisticated than any version of nativism on the market. However, in our view Marcus ends up reconfiguring the nativist position out of existence. While many of the points that Marcus makes are both interesting and correct, we see no compelling reason to classify his considered position with traditional nativism rather than anti-nativism. More generally, we that think his book points to a general moral: the opposition between nativism and anti-nativism does not help us to understand psycho-developmental issues, and should therefore be abandoned.
Keywords
Mativism Immateness Molecular genetics Developmental neuroscience Learning plasticityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bateson P. (1991). Are there principles of behavioural development?. In: Bateson, P. (eds) The Development and Integration of Behaviour, pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
- Bateson P. (2000). Taking the stink out of instinct. In: Rose, H. and Rose, S. (eds) Alas, Poor Darwin, pp. Capes, London Google Scholar
- Bateson P. (2001). Behavioral development and Darwinian evolution. In: Oyama, S., Griffiths, P.E. and Gray, R.D. (eds) Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, pp. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Bateson P. (2004a). The active role of behaviour in evolution. Biol. Phil. 19: 283–298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bateson P. (2004b). The origins of human differences. Daedalus (Fall) 2004: 36–46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bateson P. and Martin P. (1999). Design for a Life. Cape, London Google Scholar
- Chomsky N. (1993). On the natureuseand acquisition of language. In: Goldman, A.I. (eds) Readings in Philosophy and Cognitive Science, pp. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Cowie F. (1999). What’s Within: Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford, Oxford University Press Google Scholar
- Damasio A. (1994). Descartes’ Errors: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. Putnam, New York Google Scholar
- Ehrlich P.R. (2000). Human Natures. Island Press, Washington DC Google Scholar
- Elman J.L., Bates E.A., Johnson M.H., Karmiloff-Smith A., Parisi D. and Plunkett K. (1996). Rethinking Innateness. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Fodor J. (1981). The present status of the innateness controversy. In: Fodor, J. (eds) Re-Presentations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science, pp. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Fodor J. (2001). Doing without what’s within. Mind 110: 99–148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert S.F. (2001). Ecological developmental biology: Developmental biology meets the real world. Dev. Biol. 233: 1–12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert S.F. (2003a). The reactive genome. In: Muller, G.B. and Newman, S.A. (eds) Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, pp. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Gilbert S.F. (2003b). Developmental Biology. Sinauer, Sunderland (MA) Google Scholar
- Godfrey-Smith P. (1999). Genes and codes: lessons from the philosophy of mind? In V. In: (eds) Where Biology Meets Psychology, pp. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Godfrey-Smith P. (2000). On the theoretical role of “genetic coding”. Phil. Sci. 67: 26–44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gottlieb G. (1992). Individual Development and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York Google Scholar
- Gottlieb G. (1997). Synthesizing Nature-Nurture. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (NJ) Google Scholar
- Gottlieb G. (2003). Behavioral development and evolution. In: Hall, B.K. and Olson, W.M. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology, pp. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Gray R.D. (1992). Death of the gene: Developmental systems strike back. In: Griffiths, P.E. (eds) Trees of Life: Essays on the Philosophy of Biology, pp. Kluwer, Dordrecht Google Scholar
- Gray R.D. (2001). Selfish genes or developmental systems?. In: Singh, R., Krimbas, K., Paul, D.D. and Beatty, J. (eds) Thinking About Evolution, pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
- Griffiths P.E. (1997). What Emotions Really Are. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
- Griffiths P.E. (2001). Genetic information: a metaphor in search of a theory. Phil. Sci. 68: 394–412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths P.E. (2002). What is innateness?. Monist 85: 70–85 Google Scholar
- Griffiths P.E. (). The fearless vampire conservatory Philip Kitchergenetic determinism and the informational genes. In: Neumann-Held, E. and Rehmann-Sutter, C. (eds) Genes in Development: Rereading the Molecular Paradigm, pp. Duke University Press, Durham (NC) Google Scholar
- Griffiths P.E. and Gray R.D. (1994). Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. J. Phil. 91: 277–304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths P.E. and Gray R.D. (1997). Replicator II: Judgement Day. Biol. Phil. 12: 471–92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths P.E. and Gray R.D. (2001). Darwinism and developmental systems. In: Oyama, S., Griffiths, P.E. and Gray, R.D. (eds) Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, pp. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Hubel D.H. (1988). EyeBrain and Vision. Scientific American Library, New York Google Scholar
- Hubel D.H. and Wiesel T.N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. J. Physiol. 160: 106–154 Google Scholar
- Jablonka E. (2002). Information: its interpretation, its inheritanceand its sharing. Phil. Sci. 69: 578–605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jacob F. and Monod J. (1961). On the regulation of gene activity. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biol. 26: 193–211 Google Scholar
- Johnson M.H. (1997). Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford, Blackwell Google Scholar
- Khalidi M.A. (2002). Nature and nurture in cognition. Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 53: 251–272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kitcher P. (2001). Battling the undead: How (and how not) to resist genetic determinism. In: Singh, R., Krimbas, K., Paul, D.D. and Beatty, J. (eds) Thinking about Evolution, pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
- Laland K.N., Richerson P.J. and Boyd R. (1996). Developing a theory of animal social learning. In: Heyes, C.M. (eds) Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture, pp. Academic Press, New York Google Scholar
- Lewontin R.C. (2000). The Triple Helix: GeneOrganism and Environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Mameli M. 2005. The inheritance of features. Biol. Philos.Google Scholar
- Marcus G.F (2001). Plasticity and nativism: towards a resolution of an apparent paradox. In: Wermter, S., Austin, J. and Willshaw, D. (eds) Emergent Neural Computational Architectures Based on Neuroscience, pp. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Google Scholar
- Marcus G.F. (2004). The Birth of the Mind: How a Tiny Number of genes creates the complexities of Human Thought. Basic Books, New York Google Scholar
- Maynard Smith J. (2000). The concept of information in biology. Philos. Sci. 62: 177–94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meaney M. (2003). Naturenurtureand the disunity of science. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 935: 50–61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moore D.S. (2001). The Dependent Gene: The Fallacy of “Nature vs. Nurture”. Holt and Company, New York Google Scholar
- O’Leary D.D. and Stanfield B.B. (1989). Selective elimination of axons extended by developing cortical neurons is dependent on regional locale: experiments using fetal cortical transplants. J. Neurosci. 9: 2230–2246 Google Scholar
- Oyama S. (2000a). The Ontogeny of Information. Duke University Press, Durham (NC) Google Scholar
- Oyama S. (2000b). Evolution’s Eye. Duke University Press, Durham (NC) Google Scholar
- (2001). Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Pinker S. (1998). How the Mind Works. Norton, New York Google Scholar
- Pinker S. (2002). The Blank Slate. Viking Penguin, New York Google Scholar
- Pinker S. (2004). Why nature and nurture won’t go away. Daedalus (Fall) 2004: 5–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Quartz S.R. (1999). The constructivist brain. Trend. Cogn. Sci. 3: 48–57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Quartz S.R. and Sejnowski T.J. (1997). The neural basis of cognitive development: a constructivist manifesto. Behav. Brain Sci. 20: 537–596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Quartz S.R. and Sejnowski T.J. (2002). Liars, Lovers and Heroes. Morrow, New York Google Scholar
- Ridley M. (2002). Nature Via Nurture: Genes, Experience and What Makes us Human. Morrow, New York Google Scholar
- Samuels R. (1998). What brains won’t tell us about the mind: A critique of the neurobiological argument against representational nativism. Mind Lang. 13: 548–570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Samuels R. (2002). Nativism in cognitive science. Mind Lang. 17: 233–265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Samuels R. (2004). Innateness in cognitive science. Trend. Cog. Sci. 8: 136–141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stegmann U.E. (2004). The arbitrariness of the genetic code. Biol. Philos. 19: 205–222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sterelny K. (2000). The “genetic program” program: a commentary on Maynard Smith on information in biology. Philos. Sci. 67: 195–201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sterelny K. (2001). Niche construction, developmental systems and the extended replicator. In: Oyama, S., Griffiths, P.E., and Gray, R.D. (eds) Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and evolution, pp. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) Google Scholar
- Sterelny K. (2003). Thought in a Hostile World. Oxford, Blackwell Google Scholar
- Sterelny K. (2004). Symbiosis, evolvability and modularity. In: Schlosser, G. and Wagner, G. (eds) Modularity in Development and Evolution, pp. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
- Sterelny K., Smith K. and Dickison M. (1996). The extended replicator. Biol. Philos. 11: 377–403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tooby J. and Cosmides L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, pp. Oxford University Press, New York Google Scholar
- Weele C. (1999). Images of Development: Environmental Causes in Ontogeny. Suny Press, Albany (NY) Google Scholar
- West-Eberhard M.J. (2003). Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford, Oxford University Press Google Scholar
- Wiesel T.N. and Hubel D.N. (1963). Single cell responses in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens. J. Neurophysiol. 26: 1003–1017 Google Scholar