Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 79–96 | Cite as

Pre-Darwinian Taxonomy and Essentialism – A Reply to MaryWinsor

Abstract

Mary Winsor (2003) argues against the received view that pre-Darwinian taxonomy was characterized mainly by essentialism. She argues, instead, that the methods of pre-Darwinian taxonomists, in spite of whatever their beliefs, were that of clusterists, so that the received view, propagated mainly by certain modern biologists and philosophers of biology, should at last be put to rest as a myth. I argue that shes right when it comes to higher taxa, but wrong when it comes the most important category of all, the species category.

Keywords

cluster classes essentialism history species taxonomy Winsor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agassiz, L. 1859

    Essay on Classification, Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans and Roberts, London. Reprinted 1962

    Lurie, Edward eds. Harvard University PressHarvard University PressCambridge
    Google Scholar
  2. Agassiz, L. 1860On the Origin of SpeciesAmerican Journal of Science and Arts30 (2d ser.)142154Google Scholar
  3. Bentham, G. 1861On the Species and Genera of Plants, Considered with Reference to Their Practical Application to Systematic BotanyNatural History Review1133151Google Scholar
  4. Burkhardt, F., Smith, S. 1987The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, Volume 3, 1844–1846Cambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Burkhardt, F., Smith, S. 1988The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, Volume 4, 1847–1850Cambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkhardt, F., Smith, S. 1991The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, Volume 7, 1858–1859Cambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkhardt, R.W.,Jr 1987

    Lamarck and Species

    Roger, J.Fischer, J.-L. eds. Histoire du Concept d’Espéce dans les Sciences de la VieÉditions de la Fondation Singer-PolignacParis161180
    Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, W. 1962Lyell and the Reality of Species: 1830–1833Isis53325338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dana, J.D. 1857Thoughts on SpeciesAmerican Journal of Science and Arts24 (2d ser.)303316Google Scholar
  10. Darwin, C. 1859On the Origin of SpeciesJohn MurrayLondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. 1910The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other EssaysH. Holt and CoNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellegård, A. 1958Darwin and the General Reader: The Reception of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution in the British Periodical Press, 1859–1872, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm. Reprinted 1990.University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Farber, P.L. 1976The Type-Concept in Zoology during the First Half of the Nineteenth CenturyJournal of the History of Biology993119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larson, J.L. 1968The Species Concept of LinnaeusIsis59291299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leikola, A. 1987

    The Development of the Species Concept in the Thinking of Linnaeus

    Roger, J.Fischer, J.L. eds. Histoire du Concept d’Espèce dans les Sciences de la Vie, Éditions de la FondationSinger-PolignacParis4559
    Google Scholar
  16. Lovejoy, A.O. 1936The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an IdeaHarvard University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyell, C. 1832Principles of Geology, Second editionJohn MurrayLondonGoogle Scholar
  18. McOuat, G.R. 1996Species, Rules and Meaning The Politics of Language and the Ends of Definitions in 19th Century Natural HistoryStudies in the History and Philosophy of Science27473519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prichard, J.C. 1813Researches Into the Physical History of ManJohn and Arthur ArchLondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Ramsbottom, J. 1938Linnaeus and the Species ConceptProceedings of the Linnean Society of London(May 24)192219Google Scholar
  21. Sober, E. 1980Evolution, Population Thinking, and EssentialismPhilosophy of Science47350383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stamos, D.N. 1998Buffon, Darwin, and the Non-Individuality of Species – A Reply to Jean GayonBiology & Philosophy13443470Google Scholar
  23. Stamos, D.N. 2003The Species Problem: Biological Species, Ontology, and the Metaphysics of BiologyLexington BooksLanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  24. Stevens, P.F. 1994The Development of Biological Systematics: Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu, Nature, and the Natural SystemColumbia University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Stevens, P.F. 1997J.D. Hooker, George Bentham, Asa Gray and Ferdinand Mueller on Species Limits and Practice: A Mid-Nineteenth-Century Debate and Its RepercussionsHistorical Records of Australian Science11345370Google Scholar
  26. Strickland, H.E. 1837Rules for Zoological NomenclatureMagazine of Natural History1173176Google Scholar
  27. Stevens, P.F. 1842Report of a Committee Appointed to Consider of the Rules by Which the Nomenclature of Zoology may be Established on a Uniform and Permanent BasisBritish Association for the Advancement of Science (London)1842105121Google Scholar
  28. Wallace, A.R. 1858

    On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely from the Original Type

    Barrett, P.H. eds. 1977), The Collected Papers of Charles DarwinUniversity of Chicago PressChicago1018
    Google Scholar
  29. Watson, H.C. 1845Report of an Experiment Which Bears Upon the Specific Identity of the Cowslip and PrimroseThe Phytologist2217219Google Scholar
  30. Wilberforce, S. 1860On the Origin of SpeciesQuarterly Review108225264Google Scholar
  31. Winsor, M.P. 2003Non-Essentialist Methods in Pre-Darwinian TaxonomyBiology & Philosophy18387400Google Scholar
  32. Wollaston, , T.V.,  1860On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural SelectionAnnals and Magazine of Natural History5(3d ser.)132143Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations