Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 687–720 | Cite as

The role of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction: Why is it so difficult to integrate paleobiological and neontological evolutionary biology?

  • Todd Grantham


Why has it been so difficult to integrate paleontology and “mainstream” evolutionary biology? Two common answers are: (1) the two fields have fundamentally different aims, and (2) the tensions arise out of disciplinary squabbles for funding and prestige. This paper examines the role of fossil data in phylogeny reconstruction in order to assess these two explanations. I argue that while cladistics has provided a framework within which to integrate fossil character data, the stratigraphic (temporal) component of fossil data has been harder to integrate. A close examination of how fossil data have been used in phylogeny reconstruction suggests that neither explanation is adequate. While some of the tensions between the fields may be intellectual “turf wars,” the second explanation downplays the genuine difficulty of combining the distinctive data of the two fields. Furthermore, it is simply not the case that the two fields pursue completely distinct aims. Systematists do disagree about precisely how to represent phylogeny (e.g., minimalist cladograms or trees with varying levels of detail) but given that every tree presupposes a pattern of branching (a cladogram), these aims are not completely distinct. The central problem has been developing methods that allow scientists to incorporate the distinctive bodies of data generated by these two fields. Further case studies will be required to determine if this explanation holds for other areas of interaction between paleontology and neontology.

Key words

cladistics integration stratigraphy stratocladistics unification 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alroy, J. 2002Stratigraphy in Phylogeny Reconstruction - Reply to Smith (2000)J. Paleontology76587589Google Scholar
  2. Archibald, J.D. 1993The Importance of Phylogenetic Analysis for the Assessment of Species TurnoverPaleobiology19127Google Scholar
  3. Ax, P. 1987The Phylogenetic SystemWiley and SonsChichesterGoogle Scholar
  4. Beatty, J. 1997Why Do Biologists Argue Like They Do?Philosophy of Science64S432S443(Proceedings)Google Scholar
  5. Bechtel, W. eds. 1986Integrating Scientific DisciplinesMartinus NijhoffDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Behrensmeyer, A.K, Kidwell, S.M., Gastaldo, R.A. 2000Taphonomy and PaleobiologyDeep time; Paleobiology’s Perspective. Paleobiology26103147Google Scholar
  7. Bell, M. 2000Bridging the Gap between Population Biology and PaleobiologyEvolution5414571461Google Scholar
  8. Benton, M.J., Hitchin, R. 1997Congruence between Phylogenetic and Stratigraphic Data on the History of LifeProc. R. Soc. Lond B264885890Google Scholar
  9. Bock, W.J. 1979The Synthetic Explanation of Macroevolutionary Change: A Reductionistic ApproachBulletin of the Carnegie Museum132069Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, R.L 1997Patterns and Processes of Vertebrate EvolutionCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Charlesworth, B., Lande, R., Slatkin, M. 1982A neo-Darwinian Commentary on MacroevolutionEvolution36474498Google Scholar
  12. Clyde, W.C., Fisher, D.C. 1997Comparing the Fit of Stratigraphic and Morphologic Data in Phylogenetic AnalysisPaleobiology23119Google Scholar
  13. Darden, L., Maull, N. 1977Interfield TheoriesPhilosophy of Science444364Google Scholar
  14. Donoghue, M.J., Doyle, J.A., Gauthier, J., Kluge, A.G., Rowe, T. 1989The Importance of Fossils in Phylogeny ReconstructionAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics20431460Google Scholar
  15. Dupre, J. 1993The Disorder of ThingsHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Felsenstein, J. 1978Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will Be Positively MisleadingSystematic Zoology27401410Google Scholar
  17. Fisher, D.C. 1994Stratocladistics: Morphological and Temporal Patterns and their Relation to Phylogenetic ProcessGrande, L.Rieppel, O. eds. Interpreting the Hierarchy of NatureAcademic PressSan Diego133171Google Scholar
  18. Fisher, D. C., Foote, M., Fox, D.L. 2002Stratigraphy in Phylogeny Reconstruction - Comment on Smith (2000)J. Paleontology76585586Google Scholar
  19. Foote, M. 1996Perspective: Evolutionary Patterns in the Fossil RecordEvolution50111Google Scholar
  20. Forey, P.L., Forey, R.A. 2001Fossils in the Reconstruction of PhylogenyBriggs, D.E.G.Crowther, P.R. eds. Paleobiology IIBlackwellOxford515519Google Scholar
  21. Fox, D.L., Fisher, D.C., Leighton, L.R. 1999Reconstructing Phylogeny with and without Temporal DataScience28418161819Google Scholar
  22. Futuyma, D. 1986Evolutionary BiologySinauerSunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Grantham, T.A.: 2004, ‘Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of Science’, Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  24. Gauthier, J.A., Kluge, A.G., Rowe, T. 1988Amniote Phylogeny and the Importance of FossilsCladistics4105209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huelsenbeck, J., Rannala, B. 1997Phylogenetic Methods Come of Age: Testing Hypotheses in an Evolutionary ContextScience276227232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hull, D.L. 1979The Limits of CladismSystematic Zoology28416440Google Scholar
  27. Hull, D.L. 1988Science as a ProcessUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Kemp, T.S. 1999Fossils and EvolutionOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Kincaid, H. 1990Molecular Biology and the Unity of SciencePhilosophy of Science53492513Google Scholar
  30. Kitcher, P. 1999Unification as a Regulative IdealPerspectives on Science7337348Google Scholar
  31. Kumar, S., Hedges, S.B. 1998A Molecular Timescale for Vertebrate EvolutionNature392917920CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lloyd, E.A. 1988Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary TheoryGreenwoodNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Marshall, C. R. 2001Confidence Limits in StratigraphyBriggs, D.E.GCrowther, P.R. eds. Paleobiology IIBlackwellOxford542545Google Scholar
  34. Mayr, E. 1982Growth of Biological ThoughtHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitchell, S. 2002Integrative PluralismBiology and Philosophy175570Google Scholar
  36. Novacek, M. 1992Fossils as Critical Data for PhylogenyNovacek, M.J.Wheeler, Q.D. eds. Extinction and PhylogenyColumbia University PressNew York4688Google Scholar
  37. Norell, M.A. 1992Taxic Origin and Temporal Diversity: The Effect of PhylogenyNovacek, M.J.Wheeler, Q.D. eds. Extinction and PhylogenyColumbia University PressNew York89118Google Scholar
  38. Norell, M.A. 2001Stratigraphic Tests of Cladistic HypothesesBriggs, D.E.G.Crowther, P.R. eds. Paleobiology IIBlackwellOxford519522Google Scholar
  39. Norell, M.A., Novacek, M.J. 1992The Fossil Record and Evolution: Comparing Cladistic and Paleontologic Evidence for Vertebrate HistoryScience25516901693Google Scholar
  40. O’Keefe, R., Sander, P.M. 1999Paleontological Paradigms and Inferences of Phylogenetic Pattern: A Case StudyPaleobiology25518533Google Scholar
  41. Patterson, C. 1981Significance of Fossils in Determining Evolutionary RelationshipsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics12195223Google Scholar
  42. Patterson, C., Smith, A.B. 1987Is the Periodicity of Extinctions a Taxonomic Artefact?Nature330248251Google Scholar
  43. Paul, C.R.C. 1982The Adequacy of the Fossil RecordYoysey, K.A.Friday, A.E. eds. Problems of Phylogeny ReconstructionAcademic PressSan Diego75117Google Scholar
  44. Paul, C.R.C. 1992The Recognition of AncestorsHistorical Biology6239250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raup, D. 1979Biases in the Fossil Record of Species and GeneraBulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History138591Google Scholar
  46. Raup, D. 1985Mathematical Models of CladogenesisPaleobiology114252Google Scholar
  47. Reaka-Kudla, M.L., Colwell, R. 1990IntroductionDudley, E.C. eds. The Unity of Evolutionary Biology: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary BiologyDiscorides PressPortland, OR1522Google Scholar
  48. Ridley, M. 1996Evolution2nd edBlackwell ScienceCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. Rose, M.R.Lauder, G.V. eds. 1996AdaptationAcademic PressSan DiegoGoogle Scholar
  50. Ruse, M. 1981Is Science Sexist?D. ReidelDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruse, M. 1982Darwinism DefendedAddison-WesleyReading, MAGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruse, M. 1989Is the Theory of Punctuated Equilibrium a New Paradigm?The Darwinian ParadigmRoutledgeLondon118145Google Scholar
  53. Ruse, M. and Burian, R.M. (eds): 1993, Special Issue on Integration in Biology, Biology and Philosophy 8(3).Google Scholar
  54. Sandvik, H. 2000A New Evolutionary Synthesis: Do We Need One?Trends in Ecology and Evolution15205Google Scholar
  55. Sepkoski, J.J.: 1982, Compendium of Marine Fossil Families, Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology 51.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, A.B. 1994Systematics and the Fossil Record: Documenting Evolutionary PatternsBlackwell ScientificOxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, A.B. 1998What does Palaeontology Contribute to Systematics in a Molecular World?Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution9437447Google Scholar
  58. Smith, A.B. 2000Stratigraphy in Phylogeny ReconstructionJ. Paleontology74763766Google Scholar
  59. Smith, A.B., Patterson, C. 1988The Influence of Taxonomic Method on the Perception of Patterns of EvolutionEvolutionary Biology23127216Google Scholar
  60. Smokovitis, V.B. 1994Organizing Evolution: Founding the Society for the Study of Evolution (1939–1950)J. Hist. Biol.27241309Google Scholar
  61. Sober, E. 1988Reconstructing the PastMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  62. Sober, E. 2000The Philosophy of Biology2nd Ed.WestviewBoulder, COGoogle Scholar
  63. Sober, E. 2002Instrumentalism, Parsimony, and the Akaike FrameworkPhilosophy of Science69S112S123Google Scholar
  64. Sterelny, K. 1992Punctuated Equilibrium and MacroevolutionGriffiths, P. eds. Trees of LifeKluwerDordrecht4163Google Scholar
  65. Stewart, C. 1993Powers and Pitfalls of ParsimonyNature361603607Google Scholar
  66. Thompson, P. 1983Tempo and Mode in Evolution: Punctuated Equilibria and the Modern Synthetic TheoryPhilosophy of Science50432452Google Scholar
  67. Turner, J.R.G. 1986The Genetics of Adaptive Radiation: A Neo-Darwinian Theory of Punctuational EvolutionRaup, D.Jablonski, D. eds. Patterns and Processes in the History of LifeSpringer VerlagBerlin183207Google Scholar
  68. Valentine, J.W. eds. 1985Phanerozoic Diversity PatternsPrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  69. Valen, L. 1979Why Not To Be A CladistEvolutionary Theory3285299Google Scholar
  70. Wagner, P.J. 1995Stratigraphic Tests of Cladistic HypothesesPaleobiology21153178Google Scholar
  71. Wagner, P.J. 1998A Likelihood Approach for Evaluating Estimates of Phylogenetic Relationships among Fossil TaxaPaleobiology24430449Google Scholar
  72. Wagner, P.J. 1999The Utility of Fossil Data in Phylogenetic AnalysesAm. Malacological Bulletin15131Google Scholar
  73. Wagner, P.J. 2001Rate Heterogeneity in Shell Character Evolution among Lophospiroid GastropodsPaleobiology27290310Google Scholar
  74. Wagner, P.J. 2002Testing Phylogenetic Hypotheses with Stratigraphy and Morphology - A Comment on Smith (2000)J. Paleontology76590593Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Todd Grantham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations