Biologia Plantarum

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 13–20 | Cite as

Efficient in vitro plant regeneration from shoot apices and gene transfer by particle bombardment in Jatropha curcas

  • J. Purkayastha
  • T. Sugla
  • A. Paul
  • S. K. Solleti
  • P. Mazumdar
  • A. Basu
  • A. Mohommad
  • Z. Ahmed
  • L. SahooEmail author
Original Papers


An efficient and reproducible in vitro plant regeneration system from shoot apices was developed in Jatropha curcas. Benzylaminopurine (BAP; 2.5 μM) was most effective in inducing an average of 6.2 shoots per shoot apex. Incorporation of gibberellic acid (GA3; 0.5 μM) to basal medium was found essential for elongation of shoots. The BAP-habituated mother explants continuously produced shoots during successive subculture without any loss of morphogenic potential. The shoots rooted efficiently on half-strength MS medium. The rooted plantlets were acclimatized with more than 98 % success and the plants transferred to soil:compost in nursery showed no sign of variation compared to the seed-grown plants. The whole process of culture initiation to plant establishment was accomplished within 5–6 weeks. A genetic transformation system in J. curcas was established for the first time, using bombardment of particles coated with plasmid pBI426 with a GUS-NPT II fusion protein under the control of a double 35S cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) promoter. The β-glucuronidase (GUS) activity in J. curcas shoot apices was significantly affected by the gold particle size, bombardment pressure, target distance, macrocarrier travel distance, number of bombardments, and type and duration of osmotic pre-treatment. The proliferating bombarded shoot apices were screened on medium supplemented with 25 mg dm−3 kanamycin and surviving shoots were rooted on medium devoid of kanamycin. The integration of the transgene into genomic DNA of transgenic plants was confirmed by PCR and Southern blot hybridization. The transgenic plants showed insertion of single to multiple copies of the transgene.

Additional key words

benzylaminopurine β-glucuronidase gibberellic acid micropropagation PCR Southern blot 





gibberellic acid




α- naphthaleneacetic acid


indole-3-butyric acid


Murashige and Skoog’s (1962) medium


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors thank NRC (PBI), Canada for pBI426 plasmid, and NEDFi Guwahati and DARL Pithoragarh India for financial assistance.


  1. Altpeter, F., Vasil, V., Srivastava, V., Stoger, E., Vasil, I.K.: Accelerated production of transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. — Plant Cell Rep. 16: 12–17, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aragao, F.J.L., Rech E.L.: Morphological factors influencing recovery of transgenic bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of a carioca cultivar. — Int. J. Plant Sci. 158: 157–163, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baskaran, P., Jayabalan, N.: An efficient micropropagation system for Eclipta alba — avaluable medicinal herb. — In Vitro cell. dev. Biol. Plant. 41: 532–539, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brassard, N., Brissette, L., Lord, D., Laliberte, S.: Elongation, rooting and acclimatization of micropropagated shoots from mature material of hybrid larch. — Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 44: 37–44, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bregitzer, P., Tonks, D.: Inheritance and expression of transgenes in barley. — Crop Sci. 43: 4–12, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi, H.W., Lemaux, P.G., Cho, M.J.: Increased chromosomal variation in transgenic versus nontransgenic barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) plants. — Crop Sci. 40: 524–533, 2000.Google Scholar
  7. Christou, P.: Genetic transformation of crop plants using microprojectile bombardment. — Plant J. 2: 275–281, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Datla, R.S.S., Hammerlindl, J.K., Pelcher, L.E., Crosby, W.L., Selvaraj, G.: A bifunctional fusion between β-glucuronidase and neomycin phosphotransferase: a broad-spectrum marker enzyme for plants. — Gene 101: 239–246, 1991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Figueiredo, S.F.L., Albarello, N., Viana, V.R.C.: Micropropagation of Rollinia mucosa (Jacq.) Baill. — In Vitro cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 37: 471–475, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. Folling, L., Olesen, A.: Transformation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) microspore-derived callus and microspores by particle bombardment. — Plant Cell Rep. 20: 1098–1105, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fu, X., Duc, L.T., Fontana, S., Bong, B.B., Tinjuangjun, P., Sudhakar, D., Twyman, R.M., Christou, P., Kohli, A.: Linear transgene constructs lacking vector backbone sequences generate low-copy-number transgenic plants with simple integration patterns. — Transgenic Res. 9: 11–19, 2000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Geetha, N., Venkatachalam, P., Prakash, V., Sita Lakshmi, G.: High frequency induction of multiple shoots and plant regeneration from seedling explants of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). — Curr Sci. 75: 1036–1040, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Gopi, C., Vatsala, T.M., Ponmurugan, P.: In vitro multiple shoot proliferation and plant regeneration of Vanilla planifolia Andr. — a commercial spicy orchid. — J. Plant Biotechnol. 8: 37–41, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. Heller, J.: Physic Nut, Jatropha curcas L. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops. — International Plant Genetic Resource Institute, Rome 1996.Google Scholar
  15. Hossain, M., Islam, R., Karim, M.R., Joarder, O.I., Biswas, B.K.: Regeneration of plantlets from in vitro cultured cotyledons of Aegle marmelos Corr. (Rutaceae). — Sci. Hort. 57: 315–321, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iglesias, V.A., Gisel, A., Bilang, R., Leduc, N., Potrykus, I., Sautter, C.: Transient expression of visible marker genes in meristem cells of wheat embryos after ballistic microtargetting. — Planta 192: 84–91, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. Jayaraj, J., Liang, G.H., Muthukrishnan, S., Punja, Z.K.: Generation of low copy number and stably expressing transgenic bentgrass plants using minimal gene casette bombardment. — Biol. Plant. 52: 215–221, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jefferson, R.A., Kavanagh, T.A., Bevan, M.W.: GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. — EMBO J. 6: 3901–3907, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jha, T.B., Mukherjee, P., Datta, M.M.: Somatic embryogenesis in Jatropha curcas Linn., an important biofuel plant. — Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 1: 135–140, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johri, B.M., Srivastava, P.S.: Morphogenesis in endoserm cultures. — Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 70: 285–304, 1973.Google Scholar
  21. Jordan, M., Oyanedel, E.: Regeneration of Pouteria lucuma (Sapotaceae) plants in vitro. — Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 31: 249–252, 1992.Google Scholar
  22. Kamo, K., Blowers, A.: Tissue specificity and expression level of gusA under rolD, mannopine synthase and translation elongation factor 1 subunit promoters in transgenic Gladiolus plants. — Plant Cell Rep. 18: 809–815, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaushik, N., Kumar, K., Kumar, S., Kaushik, N., Roy, S.: Genetic variability and divergence studies in seed traits and oil content of jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) accessions. — Biomass Bioener. 31: 497–502, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, C.W., Yeckes, J., Thomas, J.C.: Tissue culture propagation of Euphorbia lathyris and Asclepias erosa. — Hort. Sci. 17: 533, 1982.Google Scholar
  25. Murashige, T., Skoog, F.: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. — Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Naik, S.K., Pattnaik, S., Chand, P.K.: High frequency axillary shoot proliferation and plant regeneration from cotyledonary nodes of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). — Sci. Hort. 85: 261–270, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nair, N.G., Kartha, K.K., Gamborg, O.L.: Effect of growth regulators on plant regeneration from shoot apical meristems of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) and on the culture of internodes in vitro. — Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 95: 51–56, 1979.Google Scholar
  28. Ortiz, J.P.A., Reggiardo, M.I., Ravizzini, R.A., Altabe, S.G., Cervigni, G.D.L., Spitteler, M.A., Morata, M.M., Elias, F.E, Vallejos, R.H.: Hygromycin resistance as an efficient selectable marker for wheat stable transformation. — Plant Cell Rep. 15: 877–881, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parveez, G.K.A., Chowdhury, M.K.U., Saleh, N.M. Physical parameters affecting transient GUS gene expression in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) using the biolistic device. — Industr. Crops Prod. 6: 41–50, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perl, A., Kless, H., Blumenthal, A., Galili, G., Galunj, E.: Improvement of plant regeneration and GUS expression in scutellar wheat calli by optimization. — Mol. gen. Genet. 235: 279–284, 1992.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Purohit, S.D., Singhvi, A.: Micropropagation of Achras sapota through enhanced axillary branching. — Sci. Hort. 76: 219–229, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramesh, M., Gupta, A.K.: Transient expression of β-glucuronidase gene in indica and japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.) callus cultures after different stages of co-bombardment. — Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4: 596–600, 2005.Google Scholar
  33. Ripley, K.P., Preece, J.E.: Micropropagation of Euphorbia lathyrus L. — Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 5: 213–218, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogers, S.O., Benedich, A.J.: Extraction of DNA from plant tissues. In: Gelvin, S.B., Schilperoot, R.A. (ed.): Plant Molecular Biology Manual. Pp. A6/1–10. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1988.Google Scholar
  35. Schopke, C., Taylor, N.J., Carcamo, R., Beachy, R.N.: Optimization of parameters for particle bombardment of embryogenic suspension cultures of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) using computer image analysis. — Plant Cell Rep. 16: 526–530, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shekhawat, N.S., Rathore, T.S., Singh, N.S., Deora, S.R.R.: Factors affecting In vitro clonal propagation of Prosopsis cineraria. — Plant Growth Regul. 12: 273–280, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Srivastava, P.S.: In vitro induction of triploid roots and shoots from mature endosperm of Jatropha panduraefolia. — Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 66: 93–96, 1971.Google Scholar
  38. Srivastava, P.S., Johri, B.M.: Morphogensis in mature endosperm cultures of Jatropha panduraefolia Beitr. — Biol. Pflanz. 50: 255–268, 1974.Google Scholar
  39. Sticklen, M.B., Oraby, H.F.: Shoot apical meristem: a sustainable explant for genetic transformation of cereal crops. — In Vitro cell. dev. Biol. Plant. 41: 187–200, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sujatha, M., Dhingra, M.: Rapid plant regeneration from various explants of Jatropha integerrima. — Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 35: 293–296, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sujatha, M., Makkar, H.P.S., Becker, K.: Shoot bud proliferation from axillary nodes and leaf sections of nontoxic Jatropha curcas L. — Plant Growth Regul. 47: 83–90, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sujatha, M., Mukta, N.: Morphogenesis and plant regeneration from tissue cultures of Jatropha curcas. — Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 44: 135–141, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sujatha, M., Reddy, T.P.: Differential cytokinin effects on the stimulation of in vitro shoot proliferation from meristematic explants of castor (Ricinus communis L.). — Plant Cell Rep. 17: 561–566, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suwanaketchanatit, C., Piluek, J., Peyachoknagul, S., Huehne, P.S.: High efficiency of stable genetic transformation in Dendrobium via microprojectile bombardment. — Biol. Plant. 51: 720–727, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tideman, J., Hawker, J.S.: In vitro propagation of latex producing plants. — Ann. Bot. 49: 273–279, 1982.Google Scholar
  46. Tiwari, A.K., Kumar, A., Raheman, H.: Biodiesel production from jatropha oil (Jatropha curcas) with high free fatty acids: an optimized process. — Biomass Bioener. 31: 569–575, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vengadesan, G., Ganapathi, A., Prem Anand, R., Anbazhagan, V.R.: In vitro propagation of Acacia sinuata (Lour.) Merr. via cotyledonary nodes. — Agroforestry Syst. 55: 9–15, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xiao, L., Ha, S.B.: Efficient selection and regeneration of creeping bentgrass transformants following particle bombardment. — Plant Cell Rep. 16: 874–878, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang, W., Chen, L., Qu, R., Marmey, P., Beachy, R., Fauquet, C.: Regeneration of fertile transgenic indica (group 1) rice plants following microprojectile transformation of embryogenic suspension culture cells. — Plant Cell Rep. 15: 465–469, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Purkayastha
    • 1
  • T. Sugla
    • 1
  • A. Paul
    • 1
  • S. K. Solleti
    • 2
  • P. Mazumdar
    • 1
  • A. Basu
    • 1
  • A. Mohommad
    • 3
  • Z. Ahmed
    • 3
  • L. Sahoo
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Center for EnergyIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia
  3. 3.Defence Agricultural Research LaboratoryHaldwaniIndia

Personalised recommendations