Advertisement

BioMetals

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Mass spectrometric characterization of siderophores produced by Pseudomonas taiwanensis VLB120 assisted by stable isotope labeling of nitrogen source

  • Karen Scholz
  • Till Tiso
  • Lars M. Blank
  • Heiko Hayen
Article

Abstract

The structures of three previously unknown siderophores produced by the fluorescent, biotechnologically relevant Pseudomonas taiwanensis (P. taiwanensis) VLB120 bacteria were elucidated by means of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) hyphenated to high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (HRMS/MS). They could be verified as iron(III)- and aluminum(III) complexes as well as the protonated molecules of the siderophores formed by in-source fragmentation. The siderophores were separated according to their different acyl side chains and additionally according their central ions. One of the siderophores was identified as pyoverdine with a malic acid (hydroxy succinic acid) amide side chain and a peptide moiety consisting of Orn-Asp-OHAsn-Thr-AcOHOrn-Ser-cOHOrn. The other analytes were assigned to an azotobactin with the identical peptide chain linked to the characteristic chromophoric unit and a pyoverdine with a variation in the amino acid sequence. Proline is directly linked to the pyoverdine chromophore instead of ornithine. Acidic and enzymatic hydrolyses were carried out to analyze the individual amino acids. Beside OHAsn, each amino acid of the peptide part was identified by HILIC–HRMS and comparison to authentic standards. Additionally, 15N-labeled cellular supernatants were analyzed by means of HRMS/MS. The results of the MS/MS experiments complemented by accurate mass data facilitated elucidation of the structures studied in this work and provided further confirmation of the three recently described pyoverdines of P. taiwanensis VLB120 (Baune et al. in Biometals 30:589–597, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-017-0029-7).

Keywords

Pseudomonas taiwanensis Structure characterization Siderophores Pyoverdines Azotobactin Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank HILICON AB (Umeå, Sweden) for providing the iHILIC Fusion columns. We also acknowledge Dr. Benedikt Cramer (Institute for Food Chemistry, University of Münster, Germany) for technical assistance during LTQ Orbitrap measurements and access to the instrument. Support by the German Research Foundation (INST 211/802-1) is also acknowledged.

Supplementary material

10534_2018_122_MOESM1_ESM.docx (238 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 238 kb)

References

  1. Alpert AJ (1990) Hydrophilic-interaction chromatography for the separation of peptides, nucleic acids and other polar compounds. J Chromatogr 499:177–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)96972-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baune M, Qi Y, Scholz K et al (2017) Structural characterization of pyoverdines produced by Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and Pseudomonas taiwanensis VLB120. Biometals 30:589–597.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-017-0029-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS et al (2009) Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 48:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1086/595011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Briskot G, Taraz K, Budzikiewicz H (1989) Pyoverdin-type siderophores from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Liebigs Ann Chem 1989:375–384.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jlac.198919890164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budzikiewicz H (1994) The biosynthesis of pyoverdins. Pure Appl Chem 66:2207–2210.  https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199466102207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Budzikiewicz H, Schäfer M, Fernández DU et al (2007) Characterization of the chromophores of pyoverdins and related siderophores by electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Biometals 20:135–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-006-9021-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cézard C, Farvacques N, Sonnet P (2015) Chemistry and biology of pyoverdines, Pseudomonas primary siderophores. Curr Med Chem 22:165–186.  https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867321666141011194624 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen H, Thomas MG, O’Connor SE et al (2001) Aminoacyl-S-enzyme intermediates in β-hydroxylations and α, β-desaturations of amino acids in peptide antibiotics. Biochemistry 40:11651–11659.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0115434 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornelis P (2010) Iron uptake and metabolism in pseudomonads. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:1637–1645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2550-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Duffy BK, Défago G (1999) Environmental factors modulating antibiotic and siderophore biosynthesis by Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2429–2438PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernández DU (2002) Strukturaufklärung der Siderophore und massenspektrometrische Untersuchung eines ihrer Rezeptorproteine von Pseudomonas fluorescens G173Google Scholar
  12. Fernández DU, Fuchs R, Schäfer M et al (2003) The pyoverdin of Pseudomonas fluorescens G173, a novel structural type accompanied by unexpected natural derivatives of the corresponding ferribactin. Z Naturforsch C 58:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuchs R, Schäfer M, Geoffroy VA, Meyer J-M (2001) Siderotyping–a powerful tool for the characterization of pyoverdines. Curr Top Med Chem 1:31–57.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026013395542 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hancock REW (1998) Resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria. Clin Infect Dis 27:S93–S99.  https://doi.org/10.1086/514909 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kilz S, Lenz C, Fuchs R, Budzikiewicz H (1999) A fast screening method for the identification of siderophores from fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. by liquid chromatography/electrospray mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom 34:281–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Köhler KAK, Rückert C, Schatschneider S et al (2013) Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas sp. strain VLB120 a solvent tolerant, styrene degrading bacterium, isolated from forest soil. J Biotechnol 168:729–730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.10.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Köster J, Shi R, Von Wirén N, Weber G (2011) Evaluation of different column types for the hydrophilic interaction chromatographic separation of iron-citrate and copper-histidine species from plants. J Chromatogr A 1218:4934–4943.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.03.036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin Z, Falkinham JO, Tawfik KA et al (2012) Burkholdines from Burkholderia ambifaria: antifungal agents and possible virulence factors. J Nat Prod 75:1518–1523.  https://doi.org/10.1021/np300108u CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Linget C, Azadi P, MacLeod JK et al (1992) Bacterial siderophores: the structures of the pyoverdins of Pseudomonas fluorescens ATCC 13525. Tetrahedron Lett 33:1737–1740.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(00)91719-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meyer J-M, Neely A, Stintzi A et al (1996) Pyoverdin is essential for virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun 64:518–523PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Nguyen HP, Schug KA (2008) The advantages of ESI-MS detection in conjunction with HILIC mode separations: fundamentals and applications. J Sep Sci 31:1465–1480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Park J-B, Bühler B, Panke S et al (2007) Carbon metabolism and product inhibition determine the epoxidation efficiency of solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas sp. strain VLB120DC. Biotechnol Bioeng 98:1219–1229.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Roepstorff P, Fohlman J (1984) Proposal for a common nomenclature for sequence ions in mass spectra of peptides. Biomed Mass Spectrom 11:601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmutzler K, Kracht ON, Schmid A, Buehler K (2016) Trophic regulation of autoaggregation in Pseudomonas taiwanensis VLB120. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:347–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7006-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tappe R, Taraz K, Budzikiewicz H et al (1993) Structure elucidation of a Pyoverdin produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27 853. J Prakt Chem 335:83–87.  https://doi.org/10.1002/prac.19933350113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tawfik KA, Jeffs P, Bray B et al (2010) Burkholdines 1097 and 1229, potent antifungal peptides from Burkholderia ambifaria 2.2N. Org Lett 12:664–666.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ol9029269 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Volmer J, Neumann C, Bühler B, Schmid A (2014) Engineering of Pseudomonas taiwanensis VLB120 for constitutive solvent tolerance and increased specific styrene epoxidation activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:6539–6548.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01940-14 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Weber G, von Wirén N, Hayen H (2008) Hydrophilic interaction chromatography of small metal species in plants using sulfobetaine- and phosphorylcholine-type zwitterionic stationary phases. J Sep Sci 31:1615–1622.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200800060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Inorganic and Analytical ChemistryUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.iAMB - Institute of Applied Microbiology, ABBt - Aachen Biology and BiotechnologyRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations