BioMetals

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 507–525 | Cite as

Carriers for metal complexes on tumour cells: the effect of cyclodextrins vs CNTs on the model guest phenanthroline-5,6-dione trithiacyclononane ruthenium(II) chloride

  • Susana S. Braga
  • Joana Marques
  • Elena Heister
  • Cátia V. Diogo
  • Paulo J. Oliveira
  • Filipe A. Almeida Paz
  • Teresa M. Santos
  • Maria Paula M. Marques
Article

Abstract

The complex [Ru[9]aneS3(pdon)Cl]Cl (pdon = 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione) was readily obtained from the stoichiometric reaction of Ru[9]aneS3(dmso)Cl2 with pdon. Recrystallisation in ethanol using salicylic acid as a co-crystallisation helper afforded single-crystals suitable for the collection of X-ray diffraction data which afforded a reasonable structural description. Two different kinds of molecular carriers were tested as vehicles for this complex: carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and cyclodextrins. CNTs had an insufficient loading rate for the ruthenium complex at CNT concentrations deemed non-cytotoxic on cultured cells. The cyclodextrin (CD) carriers, β-CD and TRIMEB (standing for permethylated β-CD), were able to form two adducts, studied by powder X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), 13C{1H} CP/MAS NMR and FT-IR spectroscopies. The DNA thermal denaturation studies showed that the complex 1 is able to intercalate with DNA. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the free complex [Ru[9]aneS3(pdon)Cl]Cl (1) and of its two CD adducts (2 and 3) was assessed on both rodent and human cell lines. By using the mouse K1735-M2 melanoma cell line and the non-tumour rat H9c2 cardiomyoblasts, the results showed that 1 and 2 significantly inhibited the growth of the tumour cell line while displaying a good safety profile on cardiomyoblasts. Compound 3 at 100 μM inhibited the proliferation of both cell lines, with a higher activity towards the melanoma cell line. The cytotoxicity of the compounds 13 was further assessed on human breast cancer cell lines. Against the MDA-MB-231 line, growth inhibition occurred only with 1 and 3 at the incubation time of 96 h, both with approximate inhibition rates of 50 %; against the MCF-7 line, mild cytotoxicity was observed at 48 h of incubation, with IC50 values calculated above 100 μM for 1, 2 and 3.

Keywords

Ruthenium complexes 1,10-Phenanthroline-5,6-dione Cyclodextrins Cytotoxicity Carbon nanotubes 

Abbreviations

[9]aneS3

1,4,7-Trithiacyclononane

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

CD

Cyclodextrin

CNT

Carbon nanotube

CP/MAS

Cross-polarisation with magic-angle spinning

DMEM

Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium

dmso

Dimethylsulfoxide

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid

dppz

Dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine

EDTA

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

EAT

Ehrlich ascites tumour

EtOH

Ethanol

FBS

Fetal bovine serum

FT-IR

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy

H9c2

Non-tumoural H9c2 cardiomyoblast cell line

IC50

Half maximal inhibitory concentration

K1735-M2

Mouse melanoma cell line

MCF-7

Human epithelial breast adenocarcinoma cell line (estrogen dependent)

MDA-MB-231

Human epithelial breast adenocarcinoma cell line (estrogen independent)

MTT

3-[4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

NMR

Nuclear magnetic resonance

oxCNT

Oxidised carbon nanotube

PBS

Phosphate buffered saline

phen

1,10-Phenanthroline

pdon

1,10-Phenanthroline-5,6-dione

SRB

Sulforhodamine B

TGA

Thermogravimetric analysis

XRD

X-ray diffraction

Notes

Acknowledgments

The supply of β-CD (Kleptose) by Roquette Laboratoires (Lestrem, France) is gracefully acknowledged. We are also grateful to Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal), European Union, QREN, European Fund for Regional Development (FEDER), through the programme COMPETE, for general funding to the QOPNA research unit (project PEst C-QUI/UI0062/2013; FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-037296), to the Associated Laboratory CICECO (PEst C-CTM/LA0011/2013) and to the CNC (PEst-C/SAU/LA0001/2013-2014), and for specific funding towards the purchase of the single-crystal diffractometer. The FCT and the European Social Fund, through the Programa Operacional Potencial Humano (POPH), are acknowledged for a PhD grant to J. M. (SFRH/BD/44791/2008).

Supplementary material

10534_2014_9725_MOESM1_ESM.doc (246 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 245 kb)

References

  1. Alanyali FS, Ergin E, Artagan O, Benkli K (2011) Investigation of genotoxic effects of some ruthenium complexes according to cis-platinum. Int J Pharmacol 7:96–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali-Boucetta H, Al-Jamal KT, McCarthy D, Prato M, Bianco A, Kostarelos K (2008) Multiwalled carbon nanotube-doxorubicin supramolecular complexes for cancer therapeutics. Chem Commun 4:459–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen TM, Cullis PR (2004) Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream. Science 303:1818–1822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. APEX2 (2006). Data Collection Software Version 21-RC13, Bruker AXS, Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  5. Arlt M, Haase D, Hampel S, Oswald S, Bachmatiuk A, Klingeler R, Schulze R, Ritschel M, Leonhardt A, Fuessel S, Büchner B, Kraemer K, Wirth MP (2010) Delivery of carboplatin by carbon-based nanocontainers mediates increased cancer cell death. Nanotechol 21:335101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barroug A, Glimcher MJ (2002) Hydroxyapatite crystals as a local delivery system for cisplatin: adsorption and release of cisplatin in vitro. J Orthop Res 20:274–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braga SS, Gonçalves IS, Pillinger M, Ribeiro-Claro P, Teixeira-Dias JJC (2001) Experimental and theoretical study of the interaction of molybdenocene dichloride (Cp2MoCl2) with β-cyclodextrin. J Organomet Chem 632:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braga SS, Gonçalves IS, Herdtweck E, Teixeira-Dias JJC (2003a) Solid state inclusion compound of S-ibuprofen in β-cyclodextrin: structure and characterization. New J Chem 27:597–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braga SS, Ribeiro-Claro P, Pillinger M, Gonçalves IS, Pereira F, Fernandes AC, Romão CC, Correia PB, Teixeira-Dias JJC (2003b) Encapsulation of sodium nimesulide and precursors in β-cyclodextrin. Org Biomol Chem 1:873–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braga SS, Ribeiro-Claro P, Pillinger M, Gonçalves IS, Fernandes AC, Pereira F, Romão CC, Correia PB, Teixeira-Dias JJC (2003c) Interactions of omeprazole and precursors with beta-cyclodextrin host molecules. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem 47:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braga SS, Paz FAA, Pillinger M, Seixas JD, Romão CC, Gonçalves IS (2006) Structural studies of β-cyclodextrin and permethylated β-cyclodextrin inclusion compounds of cyclopentadienyl metal carbonyl complexes. Eur J Inorg Chem 8:1662–1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Branco AF, Pereira SL, Moreira AC, Holy J, Sardão VA, Oliveira PJ (2011) Isoproterenol cytotoxicity is dependent on the differentiation state of the cardiomyoblast H9c2 cell line. Cardiovasc Toxicol 11:191–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Branco AF, Sampaio SF, Moreira AC, Holy J, Wallace KB, Baldeiras I, Oliveira PJ, Sardão VA (2012) Differentiation-dependent doxorubicin toxicity on H9c2 cardiomyoblasts. Cardiovasc Toxicol 12:326–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brandenburg K (1997-2010) DIAMOND, Version 32f Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  15. Brechin EK, Calucci L, Englert U, Margheriti L, Pampaloni G, Pinzino C, Prescimone A (2008) 1,10-Phenanthroline-5,6-dione complexes of middle transition elements: mono- and di-nuclear derivatives. Inorg Chim Acta 361:2375–2384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bruno S, Fernandes JA, Marques J, Neto SC, Ribeiro-Claro PJ, Pillinger M, Paz FAA, Marques MPM, Braga SS, Gonçalves IS (2011) Structural studies and cytotoxicity of trimethyl(ferrocenylmethyl)ammonium iodide encapsulated in beta-cyclodextrin. Eur J Inorg Chem 32:4955–4963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caira MR (2001) On the isostructurality of cyclodextrin inclusion complexes and its practical utility. Rev Roum Chim 46:371–386Google Scholar
  18. Caira MR, Bourne SA, Mhlongo WT, Dean PM (2004) New crystalline forms of permethylated beta-cyclodextrin. Chem Commun 2004:2216–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen J-F, Ding H-M, Wang J-X, Shao L (2004) Preparation and characterization of porous hollow silica nanoparticles for drug delivery application. Biomaterials 25:723–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cryopad (2006). Remote monitoring and control, Version 1451, Oxford Cryosystems, Oxford, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis ME, Brewster ME (2004) Cyclodextrin-based pharmaceuticals: past, present and future. Nature Rev 3:1023–1035Google Scholar
  22. Deegan C, Coyle B, McCann M, Devereux M, Egan DA (2006) In vitro anti-tumour effect of 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione (phendione), [Cu(phendione)3](ClO4)2·4H2O and [Ag(phendione)2]ClO4 using human epithelial cell lines. Chem Biol Interact 164:115–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dikmen M, Benkli K, Ozturk Y (2011) Inhibition of C6 glioma cell proliferation by Au(III) and Pt(II) complexes of 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione. Asian J Chem 23:2749–2754Google Scholar
  24. Fernandes JA, Lima S, Braga SS, Ribeiro-Claro P, Rodriguez-Borges JE, Teixeira C, Pillinger M, Teixeira-Dias JJC, Gonçalves IS (2005) Inclusion complex formation of diferrocenyldimethylsilane with β-cyclodextrin. J Organomet Chem 690:4801–4808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frodl A, Herebian D, Sheldrick WS (2002) Coligand tuning of the DNA binding properties of bioorganometallic (η6-arene)ruthenium(II) complexes of the type [(η6-arene)-Ru(amino acid)(dppz)]n+ (dppz = dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine), n = 1–3. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 19:3664–3673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodfellow BJ, Félix V, Pacheco SMD, de Jesus JP, Drew MGB (1997) Structural characterisation of Ru(II) [9]aneS3 polypyridyl complexes by NMR spectroscopy and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Polyhedron 16:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goss CA, Abruña HD (1985) Spectral, electrochemical, and electrocatalytic properties of 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione complexes of transition metals. Inorg Chem 24:4263–4267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guven A, Rusakova IA, Lewis MT, Wilson LJ (2012) Cisplatin@US-tube carbon nanocapsules for enhanced chemotherapeutic delivery. Biomaterials 33:1455–1461PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harada A, Saeki K, Takahashi S (1989) Preparation and properties of inclusion compounds of (η6-Arene)tricarbonylcromium(0) complexes with cyclodextrins. Organometallics 8:730–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heister E, Lamprecht C, Neves V, Tilmaciu C, Datas L, Flahaut E, Soula B, Hinterdorfer P, Coley HM, Silva SR, McFadden J (2010) Higher dispersion efficacy of functionalized carbon nanotubes in chemical and biological environments. ACS Nano 4:2615–2626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heister E, Neves V, Lamprecht C, Silva SR, Coley HM, McFadden J (2012) Drug loading, dispersion stability, and therapeutic efficacy in targeted drug delivery with carbon nanotubes. Carbon 50:622–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hilder TA, Hill JM (2008) Carbon nanotubes as drug delivery nanocapsules. Curr Appl Phys 3–4:258–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang HC, Barua S, Sharma G, Dey SK, Rege K (2011) Inorganic nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy. J Controlled Release 155(3):344–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kottke T, Stalke D (1993) Crystal handling at low-temperatures. J App Cryst 26:615–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kumar KA, Reddy KL, Vidhisha S, Satyanarayana S (2009) Synthesis, characterization and DNA binding and photocleavage studies of [Ru(bpy)2BDPPZ]2+, [Ru(dmb)2BDPPZ]2+ and [Ru(phen)2BDPPZ]2+ complexes and their antimicrobial activity. Appl Organomet Chem 23:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larsson K, Öhrström L (2004) X-ray and NMR study of the fate of the Co(1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-diketone)3+ ion in aqueous solution: supramolecular motifs in the packing 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-diketone and 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-diol complexes. Inorg Chim Acta 357:657–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin FH, Lee YH, Jian CH, Wong J-M, Shieh M-J, Wang C-Y (2002) A study of purified montmorillonite intercalated with 5-fluorouracil as drug carrier. Biomaterials 23:1981–1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Madureira J, Santos TM,  de Jesus JP, Goodfellow BJ, Santana-Marques MG, Lucena M, Drew MGB (2000) Structural characterisation of new RuII[9]aneS3 polypyridylic complexes. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 23:4422–4431Google Scholar
  39. Marques J, Anjo L, Marques MPM, Santos TM, Paz FAA, Braga SS (2008) Structural studies on supramolecular adducts of cyclodextrins with the complex [Ru([9]aneS3)(bpy)Cl]Cl. J Organomet Chem 693:3021–3028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marques J, Braga TM, Paz FAA, Santos TM, Lopes MFS, Braga SS (2009a) Cyclodextrins improve the antimicrobial Activity of the chloride salt of Ruthenium(II) chloro-phenanthroline-trithiacyclononane. Biometals 22:541–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marques J, Santos TM, Marques MPM, Braga SS (2009b) A glycine ruthenium trithiacyclononane complex and its molecular encapsulation using cyclodextrins. Dalton Trans 44:9812–9819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nakamoto K (1966) Infrared spectra of inorganic and co-ordination compounds. M. Mir, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  44. Papazisis KT, Geromichalos GD, Dimitriadis KA, Kortsaris AH (1997) Optimization of the sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay. J Immunol Methods 208:151–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parveen S, Misra R, Sahoo SK (2012) Nanoparticles: a boom to drug delivery, therapeutics, diagnostics and imaging. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 8:147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pereira CCL, Nolasco M, Braga SS, Paz FAA, Ribeiro-Claro P, Pillinger M, Gonçalves IS (2007) A combined theoretical-experimental study of the inclusion of niobocene dichloride in native and permethylated β-cyclodextrins. Organometallics 26:4220–4228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Petrovski Ž, Braga SS, Rodrigues SS, Pereira CCL, Gonçalves IS, Pillinger M, Freire C, Romão CC (2005a) Synthesis of ferrocenyldiimine metal carbonyl complexes and an investigation of the Mo adduct encapsulated in cyclodextrin. New J Chem 29:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Petrovski Ž, Braga SS, Santos AM, Rodrigues SS, Gonçalves IS, Pillinger M, Kühn FE, Romão CC (2005b) Synthesis and characterization of the inclusion compound of a ferrocenyldiimine dioxomolybdenum complex with heptakis-2,3,6-tri-O-methyl-beta-cyclodextrin. Inorg Chim Acta 358:981–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Radin S, Ducheyne P, Kamplain T, Tan BH (2001) Silica sol–gel for the controlled release of antibiotics. I. Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro release. J Biomed Mater Res 57:313–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ramos AI, Braga TM, Silva P, Fernandes JA, Ribeiro-Claro P, Lopes MFS, Paz FAA, Braga SS (2012) Chloramphenicol·cyclodextrin inclusion compounds: co-dissolution and mechanochemical preparations and antibacterial action. CrystEngComm 15:2822–2834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roseanu A, Florian PE, Moisei E, Sima LE, Evans RW, Trif M (2010) Liposomalization of lactoferrin enhanced its anti-tumoral effects on melanoma cells. Biometals 23:485–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roy I, Ohulchanskyy TY, Pudavar HE, Bergey EJ, Oseroff AR, Morgan J, Dougherty TJ, Prasad PN (2003) Ceramic-based nanoparticles entrapping water-insoluble photosensitizing anticancer drugs: a novel drug-carrier system for photodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc 125:7860–7865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roy S, Hagen KD, Maheswari PU, Lutz M, Spek AL, Reedijk J, van Wezel GP (2008) Phenanthroline derivatives with improved selectivity as DNA-targeting anticancer or antimicrobial drugs. ChemMedChem 3:1427–1434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. SAINT+ (1997–2005). Data Integration Engine v 723a ©:Bruker AXS, Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
  55. Santos TM, Madureira J, Goodfellow BJ, Drew MGB, de Jesus JP, Félix V (2001) Interaction of Ruthenium(II)-dipyridophenazine complexes with CT-DNA: effects of the polyhioether ancillary ligands. Met Based-Drugs 8:125–135PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sardão VA, Oliveira PJ, Holy J, Oliveira CR, Wallace KB (2009) Doxorubicin-induced mitochondrial dysfunction is secondary to nuclear p53 activation in H9c2 cardiomyoblasts. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64:811–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sheldrick GM (1997a) SHELXS-97, Program for Crystal Structure Solution, University of GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  58. Sheldrick GM (1997b) SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structure Refinement, University of GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  59. Sheldrick GM (1998) SADABS v201, Bruker/Siemens Area Detector Absorption Correction Program, Bruker AXS, Madison, WI, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Sheldrick GM (2008) A short history of SHELX. Acta Cryst A 64:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Skehan P, Storeng R, Scudiero D, Monks A, McMahon J, Vistica D, Warren JT, Bokesch H, Kenney S, Boyd MR (1990) New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1107–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Spek AL (1990) PLATON. Acta Cryst A 46:C34Google Scholar
  63. Spek AL (2003) Single-crystal structure validation with the program PLATON. J Appl Crystallogr 36:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Szejtli J (1998) Cyclodextrin and general overview of cyclodextrin chemistry. Chem Rev 98:1743–1754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van der Sluis P, Spek AL (1990) Acta Cryst A 46:194–201Google Scholar
  66. Wagner A, Vorauer-Uhl K (2011) Liposome technology for industrial purposes. J Drug Deliv 2011:591325. doi: 10.1155/2011/591325
  67. Wu W, Wieckowski S, Pastorin G, Benincasa M, Klumpp C, Briand J-P, Gennaro R, Prato M, Bianco A (2005) Targeted delivery of amphotericin B to cells by using functionalized carbon nanotubes. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:6358–6362CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susana S. Braga
    • 1
  • Joana Marques
    • 1
  • Elena Heister
    • 2
  • Cátia V. Diogo
    • 3
  • Paulo J. Oliveira
    • 3
  • Filipe A. Almeida Paz
    • 4
  • Teresa M. Santos
    • 4
  • Maria Paula M. Marques
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, QOPNA Research UnitUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  3. 3.CNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Largo Marquês de PombalUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  4. 4.CICECO and Department of ChemistryUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  5. 5.Molecular Physical-Chemistry R&D Group and Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations