Advertisement

Biogeochemistry

, Volume 147, Issue 2, pp 179–197 | Cite as

Phosphorus, nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon fluxes from sediments in freshwater rivermouths entering Green Bay (Lake Michigan; USA)

  • James H. LarsonEmail author
  • William F. James
  • Faith A. Fitzpatrick
  • Paul C. Frost
  • Mary Anne Evans
  • Paul C. Reneau
  • Marguerite A. Xenopoulos
Article

Abstract

Transitional areas between ecosystem types are often active biogeochemically due to resource limitation changes. Lotic-to-lentic transitions in freshwaters appear active biogeochemically, but few studies have directly measured nutrient processing rates to assess whether processing within the rivermouth is important for load estimates or the local communities. We measured oxic fluxes of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from sediments in two rivermouths of Green Bay (Lake Michigan, USA). Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) flux was positive in most cases (overall mean 1.74 mg SRP m− 2 day− 1), as was ammonium (NH4) flux (40.6 mg NH4 m− 2 day− 1). Partial least square regression (PLSR) indicated a latent variable associated with both sediment [loosely bound phosphorus (P), iron bound P, organic content] and water column properties [temperature, DOC:dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and DOC:SRP ratios (negatively)] that was moderately associated with variation in SRP flux. PLSR analysis also indicated several sediment characteristics were moderately related to NH4 flux, especially organic content, density (negative), and porosity. Flux of nitrates/nitrites (NOX) and DOC were positively associated with the water column concentrations of NOX and DOC and qualitative estimates of the labile, non-humic types of DOC. In early summer, water column NOX and DOC concentrations were high and labile DOC may have fueled denitrification, resulting in net flux into sediments of both NOX and DOC. By late summer, water column NOX and DOC were very low and both these constituents were fluxing out of sediments into the water column. Based on our estimates for the entire period from April through September, rivermouth sediments were a net source of SRP and DIN, with a DIN:SRP ratio of ~ 44 and a NH4:NOX > 1. We estimated that the sediments in the Fox rivermouth probably contributed a small proportion of the total Fox River load during the growing season 2016 (< 5%), but at times may have contributed as much as 14% of the daily load. Despite the small size of the Fox rivermouth (< 0.5% of the watershed area), these results indicate that at times sediments can contribute substantially to the overall delivery of nitrogen and phosphorus to the nearshore zone.

Keywords

nitrogen phosphorus carbon Rivermouths Sediment nutrient flux Great Lakes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Enrika Hlavacek for assistance in creating Fig. 1. Thanks to Laura Hubbard for assistance in applying statistical models from Robertson et al. 2018 to the 2016 water year. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This research was funded by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and the U.S. Geological Survey Ecosystem Mission Area.

Supplementary material

10533_2020_635_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary Material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)
10533_2020_635_MOESM2_ESM.docx (496 kb)
Supplementary Material 2 (DOCX 496 kb)

References

  1. Aguilar L, Thibodeaux LJ (2005) Kinetics of peat soil dissolved organic carbon release from bed sediment to water. Part 1. Laboratory simulation. Chemosphere 58:1309–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkhatib M, del Giorgio PA, Gelinas Y, Lehmann MF (2013) Benthic fluxes of dissolved organic nitrogen in the lower St. Lawrence estuary and implications for selective organic matter degradation. Biogeosciences 10:7609–7622.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7609-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annex 4 Task Team (2015) Recommended phosphorus loading targets for Lake Erie. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/glwqa/report-recommended-phosphorus-loading-targets-lake-erie. Accessed 17 Dec 2019
  4. American Public Health Association, APHA (2011) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. APHA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Avnimelech Y, Ritvo G, Meijer LE, Kochba M (2001) Water content, organic carbon and dry bulk density in flooded sediments. Aquacult Eng 25:25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8609(01)00068-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertani I, Obenour DR, Steger CE et al (2016) Probabilistically assessing the role of nutrient loading in harmful algal bloom formation in western Lake Erie. J Gt Lakes Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrascal LM, Galván I, Gordo O (2009) Partial least squares regression as an alternative to current regression methods used in ecology. Oikos 118:681–690.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16881.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cory R, Miller M, McKnight DM et al (2010) Effect of instrument-specific response on the analysis of fulvic acid fluorescence spectra. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 8:67–78.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2010.8.67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis T, Harke M, Marcoval M et al (2010) Effects of nitrogenous compounds and phosphorus on the growth of toxic and non-toxic strains of Microcystis during cyanobacterial blooms. Aquat Microb Ecol 61:149–162.  https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dila DK, Biddanda BA (2015) From land to lake: contrasting microbial processes across a Great Lakes gradient of organic carbon and inorganic nutrient inventories. J Gt Lakes Res 41:75–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2015.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans MA, Fahnenstiel G, Scavia D (2011) Incidental oligotrophication of North American Great Lakes. Environ Sci Technol 45:3297–3303.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es103892w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Great Lakes Interagency Task Force (2014) Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan IIGoogle Scholar
  13. Glibert PM (2017) Eutrophication, harmful algae and biodiversity—challenging paradigms in a world of complex nutrient changes. Mar Pollut Bull 124:591–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.04.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Håkanson L, Jansson M (2002) Principles of lake sedimentology, 2nd edn. The Blackburn Press, CaldwellGoogle Scholar
  15. Helms JR, Stubbins A, Ritchie JD et al (2008) Absorption spectral slopes and slope ratios as indicators of molecular weight, source, and photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved organic matter. Limnol Oceanogr 53:955–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helsel DR (2005) Nondetects and data analysis. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilton J, O’Hare M, Bowes MJ, Jones JI (2006) How green is my river? A new paradigm of eutrophication in rivers. Sci Total Environ 365:66–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hupfer M, Lewandowski J (2008) Oxygen controls the phosphorus release from lake sediments—a long-lasting paradigm in limnology. Int Rev Hydrobiol 93:415–432.  https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200711054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. James WF (2017) Internal phosphorus loading contributions from deposited and resuspended sediment to the Lake of the Woods. Lake Reserve Manag 33:347–359.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2017.1312647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Juckers M, Williams CJ, Xenopoulos MA (2013) Land-use effects on resource net flux rates and oxygen demand in stream sediments. Freshw Biol 58:1405–1415.  https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klump JV, Edgington DN, Sager PE, Robertson DM (1997) Sedimentary phosphorus cycling and a phosphorus mass balance for the Green Bay (Lake Michigan) ecosystem. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:10–26.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f96-247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krieger K (2003) Effectiveness of a coastal wetland in reducing pollution of a Laurentian Great Lake: hydrology, sediment, and nutrients. Wetlands 23:778–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kruschke JK (2011) Doing Bayesian data analysis. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Larson JH, Frost PC, Vallazza JM et al (2016) Do rivermouths alter nutrient and seston delivery to the nearshore? Freshw Biol 61:1935–1949.  https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12827 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larson JH, Frost PC, Xenopoulos MA et al (2014) Relationships between land cover and dissolved organic matter change along the river to lake transition. Ecosystems 17:1413–1425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9804-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larson JH, Trebitz AS, Steinman AD et al (2013) Great Lakes rivermouth ecosystems: scientific synthesis and management implications. J Gt Lakes Res 39:513–524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2013.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maher DT, Eyre BD (2010) Benthic fluxes of dissolved organic carbon in three temperate Australian estuaries: implications for global estimates of benthic DOC fluxes. J Geophys Res 115:G04039.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Makowski D, Ben-Shachar MS, Ludecke D (2019) Understand and describe Bayesian models and posterior distributions using bayestestR. J Open Source Softw. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marko KM, Rutherford ES, Eadie BJ et al (2013) Delivery of nutrients and seston from the Muskegon River Watershed to near shore Lake Michigan. J Gt Lakes Res 39:672–681.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2013.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matisoff G, Kaltenberg EM, Steely RL et al (2016) Internal loading of phosphorus in western Lake Erie. J Gt Lakes Res 42:775–788.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKnight DM, Boyer EW, Westerhoff PK et al (2001) Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity. Limnol Oceanogr 46:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mevik B, Wehrens R (2007) The pls package: principal component and partial least squares regression in R. J Stat Softw 18Google Scholar
  33. Moody AT, Neeson TM, Wangen S et al (2017) Pet project or best project? Online decision support tools for prioritizing barrier removals in the Great Lakes and beyond. Fisheries 42:57–65.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2016.1263195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morrice JA, Kelly JR, Trebitz AS et al (2004) Temporal dynamics of nutrients (N and P) and hydrology in a Lake Superior Coastal Wetland. J Gt Lakes Res 30:82–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(04)70379-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murphy KR, Butler KD, Spencer RGM et al (2010) Measurement of dissolved organic matter fluorescence in aquatic environments: an interlaboratory comparison. Environ Sci Technol 44:9405–9412.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es102362t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newell SE, Davis TW, Johengen TH et al (2019) Reduced forms of nitrogen are a driver of non-nitrogen-fixing harmful cyanobacterial blooms and toxicity in Lake Erie. Harmful Algae 81:86–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2018.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ohno T (2002) Fluorescence inner-filtering correction for determining the humification index of dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 36:742–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Orihel DM, Baulch HM, Casson NJ et al (2017) Internal phosphorus loading in Canadian fresh waters: a critical review and data analysis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 25:1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2016-0500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parlanti E, Wörz K, Geoffroy L, Lamotte M (2000) Dissolved organic matter fluorescence spectroscopy as a tool to estimate biological activity in a coastal zone submitted to anthropogenic inputs. Org Geochem 31:1765–1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peter S, Isidorova A, Sobek S (2016) Enhanced carbon loss from anoxic lake sediment through diffusion of dissolved organic carbon. J Geophys Res Biogeosciences 121:1959–1977.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plumb RH Jr (1981) Procedures for handling and chemical analysis of sediment and water samples. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  42. Psenner R, Pucsko R (1988) Phosphorus fractionation: advantages and limits of the method for the study of sediment P origins and interactions. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol 30:43–59Google Scholar
  43. Richardson WB, Strauss EA, Bartsch LA et al (2004) Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:1102–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robertson DM, Hubbard LE, Lorenz DL, Sullivan DJ (2018) A surrogate regression approach for computing continuous loads for the tributary nutrient and sediment monitoring program on the Great Lakes. J Gt Lakes Res 44:26–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2017.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schade JD, Espeleta JF, Klausmeier CA et al (2005) A conceptual framework for ecosystem stoichiometry: balancing resource supply and demand. Oikos 109:40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sharpley A, Jarvie HP, Buda A et al (2013) Phosphorus Legacy: overcoming the effects of past management practices to mitigate future water quality impairment. J Environ Qual 42:1308.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.03.0098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Soballe DM, Fischer JR (2004) Long term resource monitoring program procedures: water quality monitoring. Technical Report LTRMP 2004-T02-1 (Ref. 95-POO2-5). La CrosseGoogle Scholar
  48. Steinman A, Chu X, Ogdahl M (2009) Spatial and temporal variability of internal and external phosphorus loads in Mona Lake, Michigan. Aquat Ecol 43:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-007-9147-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steinman AD, Ogdahl ME (2012) Macroinvertebrate response and internal phosphorus loading in a Michigan Lake after alum treatment. J Environ Qual 41:1540.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steinman AD, Ogdahl ME, Weinert M et al (2012) Water level fluctuation and sediment–water nutrient exchange in Great Lakes coastal wetlands. J Gt Lakes Res 38:766–775.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2012.09.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steinman AD, Ogdahl ME, Weinert M, Uzarski DG (2014) Influence of water-level fluctuation duration and magnitude on sediment–water nutrient exchange in coastal wetlands. Aquat Ecol 48:143–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-014-9472-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sterner RW (2008) On the phosphorus limitation paradigm for lakes. Int Rev Hydrobiol 93:433–445.  https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200811068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stutter MI, Graeber D, Evans CD et al (2018) Balancing macronutrient stoichiometry to alleviate eutrophication. Sci Total Environ 634:439–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weishaar J, Aiken G, Bergamaschi B et al (2003) Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environ Sci Technol 37:4702–4708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wetzel RG (2001) Limnology, 3rd edn. Academic, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams CJ, Yamashita Y, Wilson HF et al (2010) Unraveling the role of land use and microbial activity in shaping dissolved organic matter characteristics in stream ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 55:1159–1171.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.3.1159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williamson CE, Morris DP, Pace ML, Olson OG (1999) Dissolved organic carbon and nutrients as regulators of lake ecosystems: resurrection of a more integrated paradigm. Limnol Oceanogr 44:795–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilson HF, Xenopoulos MA (2009) Effects of agricultural land use on the composition of fluvial dissolved organic matter. Nat Geosci 2:37–41.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Withers PJA, Jarvie HP (2008) Delivery and cycling of phosphorus in rivers: a review. Sci Total Environ 400:379–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zsolnay A, Baigar E, Jimenez M et al (1999) Differentiating with fluorescence spectroscopy the sources of dissolved organic matter in soils subjected to drying. Chemosphere 38:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences CenterU.S. Geological SurveyLa CrosseUSA
  2. 2.Center for Limnological Research and Rehabilitation, Department of BiologyUniversity of Wisconsin-StoutMenomonieUSA
  3. 3.Upper Midwest Water Science CenterU.S. Geological SurveyMiddletonUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  5. 5.Great Lakes Science CenterU.S. Geological SurveyAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations