, Volume 142, Issue 3, pp 425–442 | Cite as

Historical soil drainage mediates the response of soil greenhouse gas emissions to intense precipitation events

  • Alexander KrichelsEmail author
  • Evan H. DeLucia
  • Robert Sanford
  • Joanne Chee-Sanford
  • Wendy H. Yang


Precipitation events are increasing in intensity in the Midwestern US due to climate change. This is resulting in flooding of poorly-drained upland soils, which can feed back on climate change by altering greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2). The objective of this study was to determine if soil drainage history affects the response of soil GHG emissions to rain events. To do this, we measured N2O and CO2 fluxes from poorly-drained (PD) and well-drained (WD) soils in an agricultural field in Urbana, Illinois before and after large rain events. We also performed a lab experiment to separate effects of soil drainage history from contemporary effects of ponding. Finally, we utilized stable isotope techniques to measure gross N2O dynamics and to determine the contributions of nitrifiers and denitrifiers to net N2O fluxes. We found that ponding of WD soils led to pulses of net N2O efflux caused by stimulation of gross N2O production by denitrifiers. In contrast, PD soils had high net N2O effluxes only between large rain events, and gross N2O production was inhibited following ponding. Soil CO2 efflux was greater from PD soils under lab conditions, but autotrophic respiration obscured this trend in the field. Soil GHG emissions were a result of different contemporary ponding status as well as historical soil drainage, suggesting that historical soil redox regimes regulate soil GHG dynamics in response to precipitation. These soil drainage legacy effects are likely important in predicting soil GHG feedback effects on climate change.


Denitrification Drainage Nitrification Nitrous oxide Redox Soil oxygen 



We would like to thank Jonathan Treffkorn, Lily Zhao, and Nate Lawrence for their assistance in the lab and field. This research was funded by the NSF Dimensions of Biodiversity Grant DEB-1831842 to W.H.Y. and R.S.; and by the Francis M. and Harlie M. Clark Research Support Grant, the Lebus Fund Award, and a summer research award from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology to A.H.K. A.H.K. was supported by the National Science Foundation Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship Program (NSF IGERT 1069157). We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their many helpful suggestions to greatly improve this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest


Supplementary material

10533_2019_544_MOESM1_ESM.docx (102 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 101 kb)


  1. Adu JK, Oades JM (1978) Physical factors influencing decomposition of organic materials in soil aggregates. Soil Biol Biochem 10:109–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Algayer B, Le Bissonnais Y, Darboux F (2014) Short-term dynamics of soil aggregate stability in the field. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:1168–1176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambus P, Christensen S (1994) Measurement of N2O emission from a fertilized grassland: an analysis of spatial variability. J Geophys Res 99:16549–16555. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Askaer L, Elberling B, Glud RN et al (2010) Soil heterogeneity effects on O2 distribution and CH4 emissions from wetlands: in situ and mesocosm studies with planar O2 optodes and membrane inlet mass spectrometry. Soil Biol Biochem 42:2254–2265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Averill C, Waring BG, Hawkes CV (2016) Historical precipitation predictably alters the shape and magnitude of microbial functional response to soil moisture. Glob Change Biol 22:1957–1964. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball BC, Horgan GW, Clayton H, Parker JP (1997) Spatial variability of nitrous oxide fluxes and controlling soil and topographic properties. J Environ Qual 26:1399–1409. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banerjee S, Helgason B, Wang L et al (2016) Legacy effects of soil moisture on microbial community structure and N2O emissions. Soil Biol Biochem 95:40–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernhardt ES, Blaszczak JR, Ficken CD et al (2017) Control points in ecosystems: moving beyond the hot spot hot moment concept. Ecosystems 20:1–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blume E, Bischoff M, Reichert JM, Moorman T, Konopka A, Turco RF (2002) Surface and subsurface microbial biomass, community structure and metabolic activity as a function of soil depth and season. Appl Soil Ecol 20:171–181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Booth MS, Stark JK, Hart SC (2006) Soil-mixing effects on inorganic nitrogen production and consumption in forest and shrubland soils. Plant Soil 289:5–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapuis-Lardy L, Wrage N, Metay A et al (2007) Soils, a sink for N2O? A review. Glob Change Biol 13:1–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeAngelis KM, Silver WL, Thompson AW, Firestone MK (2010) Microbial communities acclimate to recurring changes in soil redox potential status. Environ Microbiol 12:3137–3149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De-Campos AB, Mamedov AI, Huang C (2009) Short-term reducing conditions decrease soil aggregation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:550–559. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De-Campos AB, Huang CH, Johnston CT (2012) Biogeochemistry of terrestrial soils as influenced by short-term flooding. Biogeochemistry 111:239–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dubinsky EA, Silver WL, Firestone MK (2010) Tropical forest soil microbial communities couple iron and carbon biogeochemistry. Ecology 91:2604–2612. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Estop-Aragonés C, Knorr KH, Blodau C (2013) Belowground in situ redox dynamics and methanogenesis recovery in a degraded fen during dry–wet cycles and flooding. Biogeosciences 10:421–436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans SE, Wallenstein MD (2012) Soil microbial community response to drying and rewetting stress: does historical precipitation regime matter? Biogeochemistry 109:101–116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans SE, Wallenstein MD (2014) Climate change alters ecological strategies of soil bacteria. Ecol Lett 17:155–164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Firestone MK, Firestone RB, Tiedje J (1980) Nitrous oxide from soil denitrification: factors controlling its biological production. Science 208:749–751. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  21. Ginn B, Meile C, Wilmoth J et al (2017) Rapid iron reduction rates are stimulated by high-amplitude redox fluctuations in a tropical forest soil. Environ Sci Technol 51:3250–3259. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gleason K (2008) 2008 Midwestern U.S. floods. NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, AshvilleGoogle Scholar
  23. Grable AR, Siemer EG (1968) Effects of bulk density, aggregate size, and soil water suction on oxygen diffusion, redox potentials, and elongation of corn roots. Soil Sci Soc Am J 32:180–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Groffman PM, Tiedje JM (1988) Denitrification hysteresis during wetting and drying cycles in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1626–1629. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Groffman PM, Tiedje JM (1991) Relationships between denitrification, CO2 production and air-filled porosity in soils of different texture and drainage. Soil Biol Biochem 23:299–302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grybos M, Davranche M, Gruau G et al (2009) Increasing pH drives organic matter solubilization from wetland soils under reducing conditions. Geoderma 154:13–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta SD, Wang D (2006) Water retention in soil. In: Lal R (ed) Encyclopedia of soil science, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 1864–1869Google Scholar
  28. Hawkes CV, Keitt TH (2015) Resilience vs. historical contingency in microbial responses to environmental change. Ecol Lett 18:612–625. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hawkes CV, Waring BG, Rocca JD, Kivlin SN (2017) Historical climate controls soil respiration responses to current soil moisture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:6322–6327. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herman DJ, Brooks PD, Ashraf M et al (1995) Evaluation of methods for nitrogen-15 analysis of inorganic nitrogen in soil extracts. II. Diffusion methods. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 26:1675–1685. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horn R, Smucker A (2005) Structure formation and its consequences for gas and water transport in unsaturated arable and forest soils. Soil Tillage Res 82:5–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang W, Hall SJ (2017) Elevated moisture stimulates carbon loss from mineral soils by releasing protected organic matter. Nat Commun 8:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Illinois Climate Network (2017) Water and atmospheric resources monitoring program. Illinois State Water Survey, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  34. Jarecke KM, Loecke TD, Burgin AJ (2016) Coupled soil oxygen and greenhouse gas dynamics under variable hydrology. Soil Biol Biochem 95:164–172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kanwar RS, Baker JL, Mukhtar S (1988) Excessive soil water effects at various stages of development on the growth and yield of corn. Trans ASAE 31:133–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knowles R (1982) Denitrification. Microbiol Rev 46:43–70Google Scholar
  37. Kroon PS, Hensen A, Jonker HJJ et al (2007) Suitability of quantum cascade laser spectroscopy for CH4 and N2O eddy covariance flux measurements. Biogeosciences 4:715–728. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lenth RV (2016) Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. J Stat Softw 69:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li X, McCarty GW, Lang M et al (2018) Topographic and physicochemical controls on soil denitrification in prior converted croplands located on the Delmarva Peninsula, USA. Geoderma 309:41–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Linn DM, Doran JW (1984) Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and nontilled soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1267–1272. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liptzin D, Silver WL (2009) Effects of carbon additions on iron reduction and phosphorus availability in a humid tropical forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1696–1702. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matson PA, Vitousek PM, Livingston GP, Swanberg NA (1990) Sources of variation in nitrous oxide flux from Amazonian ecosystems. J Geophys Res 95:16789–16798. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matthias D, Yarger DN, Weinbeck RS (1978) A numberical evaluation of chamber methods for determining gas fluxes. Geophys Res Lett 5:765–768. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McClain ME, Boyer EW, Dent CL et al (2003) Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems 6:301–312. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Min SK, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470:378–381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Molodovskaya M, Singurindy O, Richards BK et al (2012) Temporal variability of nitrous oxide from fertilized croplands: hot moment analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:1728–1740. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nitzsche KN, Kaiser M, Premke K et al (2017) Organic matter distribution and retention along transects from hilltop to kettle hole within an agricultural landscape. Biogeochemistry 136:47–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Palta MM, Ehrenfeld JG, Gimenez D et al (2016) Soil texture and water retention as spatial predictors of denitrification in urban wetlands. Soil Biol Biochem 101:237–250. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pan W, Kan J, Inamdar S et al (2016) Dissimilatory microbial iron reduction release DOC (dissolved organic carbon) from carbon-ferrihydrite association. Soil Biol Biochem 103:232–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parkin TB, Kaspar TC (2006) Nitrous oxide emissions from corn-soybean systems in the Midwest. J Environ Qual 35:1496–1506. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peralta AL, Ludmer S, Kent AD (2013) Hydrologic history influences microbial community composition and nitrogen cycling under experimental drying/wetting treatments. Soil Biol Biochem 66:29–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pett-Ridge J, Silver WL, Firestone MK (2006) Redox fluctuations frame microbial community impacts on N-cycling rates in a humid tropical forest soil. Biogeochemistry 81:95–110. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pinheiro J, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2017) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects modelsGoogle Scholar
  54. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  55. Saha D, Rau BM, Kaye JP et al (2017) Landscape control of nitrous oxide emissions during the transition from conservation reserve program to perennial grasses for bioenergy. GCB Bioenergy 9:783–795. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schimel JP, Jackson LE, Firestone MK (1989) Spatial and temporal effects on plant microbial competition for inorganic nitrogen in a California annual grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 21:1059–1066. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sey BK, Manceur AM, Whalen JK et al (2008) Small-scale heterogeneity in carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane production from aggregates of a cultivated sandy-loam soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2468–2473. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, Denef K (2004) A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res 79:7–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Suriyavirun N, Krichels AH, Kent AD, Yang WH (2019) Microtopographic differences in soil properties and microbial community composition at the field scale. Soil Biol Biochem 131:71–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thompson A, Rancourt DG, Chadwick OA, Chorover J (2011) Iron solid-phase differentiation along a redox gradient in basaltic soils. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:119–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Turner DA, Chen D, Galbally IE et al (2008) Spatial variability of nitrous oxide emissions from an Australian irrigated dairy pasture. Plant Soil 309:77–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turner PA, Griffis TJ, Mulla DJ et al (2016) A geostatistical approach to identify and mitigate agricultural nitrous oxide emission hotspots. Sci Total Environ 572:442–449. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. USGCRP (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. In: Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (eds) United States global change research program. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Groenigen JW, Huygens D, Boeckx P et al (2015) The soil N cycle: new insights and key challenges. Soil 1:235–256. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Villarini G, Smith JA, Vecchi GA (2013) Changing frequency of heavy rainfall over the central United States. J Clim 26:351–357. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. von Fischer JC, Hedin LO (2007) Controls on soil methane fluxes: tests of biophysical mechanisms using table isotope tracers. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 21:1–9. Google Scholar
  67. Wang B, Lerdau M, He Y (2017) Widespread production of nonmicrobial greenhouse gases in soils. Glob Change Biol 23:4472–4482. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yanai J, Sawamoto T, Oe T et al (1965) Spatial variability of nitrous oxide emissions and their soil-related determining factors in an agricultural field. J Environ Qual 32:1965–1977. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yang WH, Silver WL (2016) Gross nitrous oxide production drives net nitrous oxide fluxes across a salt marsh landscape. Glob Change Biol 22:2228–2237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang WH, Teh YA, Silver WL (2011) A test of a field-based 15N-nitrous oxide pool dilution technique to measure gross N2O production in soil. Glob Change Biol 17:3577–3588. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yang WH, Ryals RA, Cusack DF, Silver WL (2017) Cross-biome assessment of gross soil nitrogen cycling in California ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 107:144–155. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zeglin LHZ, Ottomley PJB, Umpponen AJ et al (2013) Altered precipitation regime affects the function and composition of soil microbial communities on multiple time scales. Ecology 94:2334–2345. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation BiologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant BiologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  4. 4.US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research ServiceUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations