Advertisement

Biogeochemistry

, Volume 142, Issue 2, pp 265–279 | Cite as

Results of a controlled field experiment to assess the use of tree tissue concentrations as bioindicators of air Hg

  • Matthew A. Peckham
  • Mae Sexauer GustinEmail author
  • Peter J. Weisberg
  • Peter Weiss-Penzias
Article
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

The utility of trees as bioindicators of atmospheric mercury (Hg) depends upon how accurately tree tissue concentrations reflect air-Hg concentrations at a given location and time. The relationship between air-Hg, and Hg concentration in tree tissues was investigated using potted Pinus nigra (Austrian pine) saplings 6 to 7 years in age moved from a tree farm in Oregon, USA, to three locations with different weather, two with different air total Hg (THg) concentrations, all with different predominant gaseous oxidized Hg chemistry, and one being impacted by the marine boundary layer. An aqueous Hg bromide root spike showed no significant effect on above ground tissue concentration. Over two growing seasons, needles, bark, and tree rings were sampled and analyzed for THg concentrations to compare with those collected when the trees originally arrived in Reno, NV (control) versus that measured in the new locations. Overall, foliar Hg concentrations increased significantly at all new locations relative to the control. Spring sample concentrations were lower than fall for foliage at two locations, indicating resorption of Hg along with nutrients. All trees had higher mean Hg concentrations in the outermost tree rings relative to the control, consistent with increased air total Hg concentrations and changing air chemistry. Higher concentrations were measured in the outer bark of trees where ambient GOM concentrations were highest. Higher inner bark concentrations were correlated with the more humid location where high methylmercury concentrations have been measured in fog. Results demonstrated that Pinus nigra tissues are effective biomonitors for air Hg exposures and that translocation from leaves to rings via the phloem is an important pathway for sequestration in plant tissue. We also show that plants are active assimilators of atmospheric Hg, and as such, local environmental conditions influence ring, bark, and foliage concentrations. The latter has important implications for understanding tissue Hg concentrations, and supports the use of tree ring Hg concentrations as archives.

Keywords

Pinus nigra Inner bark Outer bark Tree rings Foliage Gaseous oxidized mercury 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by NSF Grant BCS-1461314. Geography of Air Pollution: Tree Rings as Spatial and Temporal Proxies for Atmospheric Mercury Concentrations. Thanks to the Gustin and Weiss-Penzias undergraduate students that helped process many tree samples associated with this project. Thank you to Daniel Fernandez for the fog water deposition data. Thank you also to Dr. Adam Csank for being on the first author’s thesis committee.

Supplementary material

10533_2018_533_MOESM1_ESM.docx (734 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 733 kb)

References

  1. Arnold J et al (2018) Evidence for nonstomatal uptake of hg by aspen and translocation of Hg from foliage to tree rings in austrian pine. Environ Sci Technol 52(3):1174–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beal SA, Osterberg EC, Zdanowicz CM, Fisher DA (2015) Ice core perspective on mercury pollution during the past 600 years. Environ Sci Technol 49(13):7641–7647.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biester H, Bindler R, Martinez-Cortizas A, Engstrom DR (2007) Modeling the past atmospheric deposition of mercury using natural archives. Environ Sci Technol 41(14):4851–4860.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0704232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop KH, Lee Y-H, Munthe J, Dambrine E (1998) Xylem sap as a pathway for total mercury and methylmercury transport from soils to tree canopy in the boreal forest. Biogeochemistry 40(2–3):101–113.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005983932240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle J, Chiverrell R, Schillereff D (2015) Lacustrine archives of metals from mining and other industrial activities—a geochemical approach. Environ Contam Dev Paleoenviron Res 121:159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9541-8_7 Google Scholar
  6. Chellman N, Mcconnell JR, Arienzo M, Pederson GT, Aarons SM, Csank A (2017) Reassessment of the upper fremont glacier ice-core chronologies by synchronizing of ice-core-water isotopes to a nearby tree-ring chronology. Environ Sci Technol 51(8):4230–4238.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiarantini L, Rimondi V, Benvenuti M, Beutel MW, Costagliola P, Gonnelli C, Paolieri M (2016) Black pine (Pinus nigra) barks as biomonitors of airborne mercury pollution. Sci Total Environ 569–570:105–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiarantini L, Rimondi V, Bardelli F, Benvenuti M, Cosio C, Costagliola P, Sarret G (2017) Mercury speciation in Pinus nigra barks from Monte Amiata (Italy): an X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. Environ Pollut 227:83–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung M, Dufour A, Pluche R, Thompson S (2017) How much does dry-season fog matter? Quantifying fog contributions to water balance in a coastal California watershed. Hydrol Process 31(22):3948–3961.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clackett SP, Porter TJ, Lehnherr I (2018) 400-year record of atmospheric mercury from tree-rings in northwestern Canada. Environ Sci Technol 52(17):9625–9633.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conaway CH, Black FJ, Weiss-Penzias P, Gault-Ringold M, Flegal AR (2010) Mercury speciation in Pacific coastal rainwater, Monterey Bay, California. Atmos Environ 44(14):1788–1797.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conte E, Lombardi F, Battipaglia G, Palombo C, Altieri S, Porta NL, Tognetti R (2018) Growth dynamics, climate sensitivity and water use efficiency in pure vs. mixed pine and beech stands in Trentino (Italy). For Ecol Manage 409:707–718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cutter BE, Guyette RP (1993) Anatomical, chemical, and ecological factors affecting tree species choice in dendrochemistry studies. J Environ Qual 22(3):611.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200030028x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fay L, Gustin M (2006) Assessing the influence of different atmospheric and soil mercury concentrations on foliar mercury concentrations in a controlled environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 181(1–4):373–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9308-6 Google Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald W, Lamborg C (2014) Geochemistry of mercury in the environment. Treatise Geochem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00904-9 Google Scholar
  16. Fleck JA, Grigal DF, Nater EA (1999) Water. Air Soil Pollut 115:513.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005194608598 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frescholtz TF, Gustin MS, Schorran DE, Fernandez GC (2003) Assessing the source of mercury in foliar tissue of quaking aspen. Environ Toxicol Chem 22(9):2114–2119.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620220922 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fritts HC (1966) Growth-rings of trees: their correlation with climate. Science 154(3752):973–979.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3752.973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graydon JA, Louis VL, Lindberg SE, Hintelmann H, Krabbenhoft DP (2006) Investigation of mercury exchange between forest canopy vegetation and the atmosphere using a new dynamic chamber†. Environ Sci Technol 40(15):4680–4688.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0604616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gustin MS, Amos HM, Huang J, Miller MB, Heidecorn K (2015) Measuring and modeling mercury in the atmosphere: a critical review. Atmos Chem Phys 15(10):5697–5713.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gustin MS, Pierce AM, Huang J, Miller MB, Holmes HA, Loria-Salazar SM (2016) Evidence for different reactive Hg sources and chemical compounds at adjacent valley and high elevation locations. Environ Sci Technol 50(22):12225–12231.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heerwaarden LM, Toet S, Aerts R (2003) Current measures of nutrient resorption efficiency lead to a substantial underestimation of real resorption efficiency: facts and solutions. Oikos 101(3):664–669.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12351.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hojdová M et al (2010) Changes in mercury deposition in a mining and smelting region as recorded in tree rings. Water, Air Soil Pollut 216(1–4):73–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0515-9 Google Scholar
  24. Huang J, Gustin MS (2012) Evidence for a free troposphere source of mercury in wet deposition in the western United States. Environ Sci Technol 46(12):6621–6629.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es3005915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang J, Gustin MS (2014) Use of passive sampling methods and models to understand sources of mercury deposition to high elevation sites in the western United States. Environ Sci Technol 49(1):432–441.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es502836w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang J, Miller MB, Weiss-Penzias P, Gustin MS (2013) Comparison of gaseous oxidized Hg measured by KCl-coated denuders, and nylon and cation exchange membranes. Environ Sci Technol 47(13):7307–7316.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es4012349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hutnik RJ, Mcclenahen JR, Long RP, Davis DD (2014) Mercury accumulation in Pinus nigra (Austrian Pine). Northeast Nat 21(4):529–540.  https://doi.org/10.1656/045.021.0402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones PD (2004) Climate over past millennia. Rev Geophys 42:4.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003rg000143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jung R, Ahn YS (2017) Distribution of mercury concentrations in tree rings and surface soils adjacent to a phosphate fertilizer plant in southern Korea. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 99(2):253–257.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-017-2115-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Killingbeck KT (1996) Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77(6):1716–1727.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2265777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirchner P, Biondi F, Edwards R, Mcconnell JR (2008) Variability of trace metal concentrations in Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi) tree rings from the Tahoe Basin, California, USA. J For Res 13(6):347–356.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-008-0093-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klieforth Harold (1992) Climate of peavine mountain. Mentzelia 6:3–6Google Scholar
  33. Lepp N (1975) The potential of tree-ring analysis for monitoring heavy metal pollution patterns. Environ Pollut 9(1):49–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-9327(75)90055-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luthardt L, Rößler R (2017) Fossil forest reveals sunspot activity in the early Permian. Geology 45(3):279–282.  https://doi.org/10.1130/g38669.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meko DM, Therrell MD, Baisan CH, Hughes MK (2001) Sacramento river flow reconstructed to A.d. 869 from tree rings1. JAWRA 37(4):1029–1039.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb05530.x Google Scholar
  36. Millhollen AG, Gustin MS, Obrist D (2006) Foliar mercury accumulation and exchange for three tree species. Environ Sci Technol 40(19):6001–6006.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0609194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Navrátil T, Šimeček M, Shanley JB, Rohovec J, Hojdová M, Houška J (2017) The history of mercury pollution near the Spolana chlor-alkali plant (Neratovice, Czech Republic) as recorded by Scots pine tree rings and other bioindicators. Sci Total Environ 586:1182–1192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nóvoa-Muñoz J, Pontevedra-Pombal X, Martínez-Cortizas A, Gayoso EG (2008) Mercury accumulation in upland acid forest ecosystems nearby a coal-fired power-plant in Southwest Europe (Galicia, NW Spain). Sci Total Environ 394(2–3):303–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.01.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Odabasi M, Tolunay D, Kara M, Falay EO, Tuna G, Altiok H, Elbir T (2016) Investigation of spatial and historical variations of air pollution around an industrial region using trace and macro elements in tree components. Sci Total Environ 550:1010–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. OHara BF (2007) Weather and climate of the Reno-Carson City-Lake Tahoe Region. Mackay School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, RenoGoogle Scholar
  41. Panshin AJ, De Zeeuw C (1980) Textbook of wood technology, vol 1. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Peckham MA, Gustin MS, Weisberg PJ (2018) Assessment of the suitability of tree rings as archives of atmospheric mercury pollution using tree cores. Environ Sci and Technol (Submitted)Google Scholar
  43. Potter, D. A. (1998). Forested communities of the upper montane in the central and southern Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-169. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, p 319Google Scholar
  44. Prasetia H, Sakakibara M, Omori K, Laird J, Sera K, Kurniawan I (2018) Mangifera indica as bioindicator of mercury atmospheric contamination in an asgm area in North Gorontalo Regency, Indonesia. Geosciences 8(2):31.  https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8010031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rytuba JJ (2014) Naturally elevated monomethylmercury and mercury concentrations of redwood trees of Coastal California. Abstract AGU Fall Conference 2014, December 18, 2014Google Scholar
  46. Selin NE (2009) Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury: a review. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34(1):43–63.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.051308.084314 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Siwik EI, Campbell LM, Mierle G (2010) Distribution and trends of mercury in deciduous tree cores. Environ Pollut 158(6):2067–2073.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stamenkovic J, Gustin MS (2009) Nonstomatal versus stomatal uptake of atmospheric mercury. Environ Sci Technol 43(5):1367–1372.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es801583a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. UNEP (2013) Global mercury assessment 2013: sources, emissions, releases and environmental transport. UNEP Chemicals Branch, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  50. Watmough SA (1997) An evaluation of the use of dendrochemical analyses in environmental monitoring. Environ Rev 5(3–4):181–201.  https://doi.org/10.1139/a97-010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weiss-Penzias PS, Ortiz C, Acosta RP, Heim W, Ryan JP, Fernandez D, Flegal AR (2012) Total and monomethyl mercury in fog water from the central California coast. Geophys Res Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl050324 Google Scholar
  52. Weiss-Penzias P, Amos HM, Selin NE, Gustin MS, Jaffe DA, Obrist D, Giang A (2015) Use of a global model to understand speciated atmospheric mercury observations at five high-elevation sites. Atmos Chem Phys 15(3):1161–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weiss-Penzias PS, Gay DA, Brigham ME, Parsons MT, Gustin MS, Schure AT (2016) Trends in mercury wet deposition and mercury air concentrations across the U.S. and Canada. Sci Total Environ 568:546–556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wright G, Woodward C, Peri L, Weisberg PJ, Gustin MS (2014a) Application of tree rings [dendrochemistry] for detecting historical trends in air Hg concentrations across multiple scales. Biogeochemistry 120(1–3):149–162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-014-9987-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wright G, Gustin MS, Weiss-Penzias P, Miller MB (2014b) Investigation of mercury deposition and potential sources at six sites from the Pacific Coast to the Great Basin, USA. Sci Total Environ 470–471:1099–1113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weiss-Penzias P, Coale K, Heim W, Fernandez D, Oliphant A, Dodge C, Hoskins D, Farlin J, Moranville R, Olson A (2018) Total- and monomethyl-mercury and major ions in coastal California fog water: results from two years of sampling on land and at sea total and monomethyl-mercury in coastal California fog on land and at sea. Elementa: Sci Anthr.  https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.0001011.elementascience.org Google Scholar
  57. Zhang L et al (1995) Mercury concentration in tree rings of black spruce (Picea mariana Mill. B.S.P.) in boreal Quebec, Canada. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 81(1–2):163–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00477263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang L, Wu Z, Cheng I, Wright LP, Olson ML, Gay DA, Weiss-Penzias P (2016) The estimated six-year mercury dry deposition across North America. Environ Sci Technol 50(23):12864–12873.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew A. Peckham
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mae Sexauer Gustin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter J. Weisberg
    • 1
  • Peter Weiss-Penzias
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental ScienceUniversity of Nevada-RenoRenoUSA
  2. 2.Graduate Program of Hydrologic SciencesUniversity of Nevada-RenoRenoUSA
  3. 3.Chemistry and Biochemistry DepartmentUniversity of California-Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations