Advertisement

In the path of the Hurricane: impact of Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee on watershed hydrology and biogeochemistry from North Carolina to Maine, USA

  • Philippe Vidon
  • Diana L. Karwan
  • A. Scott Andres
  • Shreeram Inamdar
  • Sujay Kaushal
  • Jonathan Morrison
  • John Mullaney
  • Donald S. Ross
  • Andrew W. Schroth
  • James B. Shanley
  • Byungman Yoon
Article

Abstract

Although many climate predictions suggest that the frequency and intensity of large storm events might increase in the coming decades, few studies document the full impact of such events along their path. Here, we synthesize information on the impact of Hurricane Irene (formed August 21 2011) and Tropical Storm Lee (formed August 30, 2011) on erosion and sediment transport, lake metabolism, riparian hydrology and biogeochemistry, and stream water quality, from North Carolina to Maine. In almost all cases, these storms generated unprecedented changes in water quality (concentrations, loads), from tenfold increases in DOC and 100-fold increases in POC in Maryland, to 100-fold increases in TSS concentrations in Pennsylvania. Overbank flooding and up to 200-year streamflow events were recorded in New York and Vermont. In many cases, particulate loads (e.g. POC, PP, TSS) occurring during Irene and Lee represented more than 30% of the annual load. The dominance of particulate exports over solutes during Irene and Lee is consistent with the mobilization of normally immobile sediment pools, and massive erosion as reported at many locations across the Northeastern US. Several studies reported long lasting (> 1 year) effects of Irene and Lee on cyanobacterial blooms, erosion, or stream suspended sediment concentrations. However, this review also highlighted the lack of a consistent strategy in terms of methods, and measured water quality parameters. This strongly hinders our ability to fully assess the large-scale impact of such events on our environment, and ultimately their impact on our economy and society.

Keywords

Tropical Storm Lee Hurricane Irene Watersheds Water quality Erosion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This review is the result of a collaboration effort amongst the authors of this study that started at the AGU Chapman Conference on Extreme Climate Events held in San Juan Puerto Rico in January 2017. We would like to thank the USDA (award # 2016-67019-25280), NSF-EPSCoR (#1641157), USGS, National CZO office, and the US Forest Service IITF for funding this AGU Chapman conference on Extreme Climate Events in San Juan, Puerto Rico and providing travel funds to the attendees. Dr. Peter Groffman provided data for the BES LTER site online for Baisman Run. Significant funding for collection of these data and other data in this paper was provided by the National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research Program (NSF DEB-0423476 and DEB-1027188) and the Critical Zone Observatory Program (CRB CZO - NSF EAR 1331856). White Clay Creek sampling and analysis was enabled by an NSF postdoctoral fellowship to Dr. Diana Karwan (NSF EAR 1144760). The contributions of Andrew Schroth and Donald Ross were supported by the National Science Foundation under VT EPSCoR Grant No. NSF OIA 1556770 and IIA-133046. Laura Medalie of the US Geological Survey provided WRTDS output and useful insight towards its analysis and limitations. She also provided constructive comments on an earlier version of the paper. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

References

  1. Anderson I, Rizzo DM, Huston DR, Dewoolkar MM (2017) Analysis of bridge and stream conditions of over 300 Vermont bridges damaged in Tropical Storm Irene. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1285329
  2. Avila LA, Cangialosi J (2012) Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Irene (AL092011). National Hurricane Center—National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092011_Irene.pdf
  3. Brown DP (2011) Tropical cyclone report: Tropical Storm Lee (AL132011). National Hurricane Center—National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL132011_Lee.pdf
  4. Caverly E, Kaste JM, Hancock GS, Chambers RM (2013) Dissolved and particulate organic carbon fluxes from an agricultural watershed during consecutive tropical storms. Geophys Res Lett 40:5147–5152.  https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50982 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng P, Li M, Li Y (2013) Generation of an estuarine sediment plume by a tropical storm. J Geophys Res Ocean 118:856–868.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dethier E, Magilligan FJ, Renshaw CE, Nislow KH (2016) The role of chronic and episodic disturbances on channel–hillslope coupling: the persistence and legacy of extreme floods. Earth Surf Process Landforms 41:1437–1447.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhillon GS, Inamdar S (2013) Extreme storms and changes in particulate and dissolved organic carbon in runoff: Entering uncharted waters? Geophys Res Lett 40:1322–1327.  https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhillon GS, Inamdar S (2014) Storm event patterns of particulate organic carbon (POC) for large storms and differences with dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Biogeochemistry 118:61–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9905-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gellis AC, Myers MK, Noe GB, Hupp CR, Schenk ER, Myers L (2017) Storms, channel changes, and a sediment budget for an urban-suburban stream, difficult run, Virginia, USA. Geomorphology 278:128–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Groffman PM, Butterbach-Bahl K, Fulweiler RW, Gold AJ, Morse JL, Stander EK, Tague C, Tonitto C, Vidon P (2009) Challenges to incorporating spatially and temporally explicit phenomena (hotspots and hot moments) in denitrification models. Biogeochemistry 93:49–77.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9277-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Groisman PY, Knight RW, Karl TR (2012) Changes in intense precipitation over the Central United States. J Hydrometeorol 13:47–66.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-039.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrologic cycle to global warming. J Clim 19:5686–5699.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3990.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Higgins RW, Kousky VE (2012) Changes in observed daily precipitation over the United States between 1950-1979 and 1980-2009. J Hydrometeorol.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-062.1 Google Scholar
  14. Hirsch RM, Moyer DL, Archfield SA (2010) Weighted regressions on time, discharge, and season (WRTDS), with an application to Chesapeake Bay river inputs. J Am Water Resour Assoc 46:857–880.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00482.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodgkins GA, Dudley RW (2013) Modeled future peak streamflows in four coastal Maine rivers: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013-5080, 18 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Horowitz AJ, Elrick KA, Smith JJ, Stephens VC (2014) The effects of Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee on the bed sediment geochemistry of U.S. Atlantic coastal rivers. Hydrol Process 28:1250–1259.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inamdar S, Dhillon G, Singh S, Parr T, Qin Z (2015) Particulate nitrogen exports in stream runoff exceed dissolved nitrogen forms during large tropical storms in a temperate, headwater, forested watershed. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 120:1548–1566.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG002909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1256/004316502320517344 Google Scholar
  19. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Isles PDF, Giles CD, Gearhart TA, Xu Y, Druschel GK, Schroth AW (2015) Dynamic internal drivers of a historically severe cyanobacteria bloom in Lake Champlain revealed through comprehensive monitoring. J Great Lakes Res 41:818–829.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2015.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karl A, Thomas R (2017) Secular trends of precipitation amount, frequency, and intensity in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karwan, D.L., J.E. Pizzuto, R. Aalto, J. Marquard, A. Harpold, K. Skalak, A. Benthem, D. F. Levia, C.M. Siegert, A.K. Aufdenkampe. Event-scale suspended sediment age influenced by hydrologic flux in a piedmont Mid-Atlantic watershed, USA. Water Resources Research (in review)Google Scholar
  23. Kaushal SS, Groffman PM, Mayer PM, Striz E, Arthur J (2008) Effects of stream restoration on denitrification in an Urbanizing Watershed. Ecol Appl 18:789–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaushal SS, Groffman PM, Band LE, Elliott EM, Shields CA, Kendall C (2011) Tracking nonpoint source nitrogen pollution in human-impacted watersheds. Environ Sci Technol 45:8225–8232.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es200779e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaushal SS, Mayer PM, Vidon PG, Smith RM, Pennino MJ, Newcomer TA, Duan S, Welty C, Belt KT (2014) Land use and climate variability amplify carbon, nutrient, and contaminant pulses: a review with management implications. J Am Water Resour Assoc 50:585–614.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klug JL, Richardson DC, Ewing HA, Hargreaves BR, Samal NR, Vachon D, Pierson DC, Lindsey AM, O’Donnell DM, Effler SW, Weathers KC (2012) Ecosystem effects of a tropical cyclone on a network of lakes in northeastern North America. Environ Sci Technol 46:11693–11701.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es302063v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kunkel KE, Stevens LE, Stevens SE, Sun L, Janssen E, Wuebbles D, Dobson JG (2013) Regional climate trends and scenarios for the U.S. National Climate Assessment: Part 9. Climate of the Contiguous United States. NOAA Technical Report NESDIS 142-9. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  28. Laudon H, Spence C, Buttle J, Carey SK, McDonnell JJ, McNamara JP, Soulsby C, Tetzlaff D (2017) Save northern high-latitude catchments. Nat Geosci 10:324–325.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magilligan FJ, Buraas EM, Renshaw CE (2015) The efficacy of stream power and flow duration on geomorphic responses to catastrophic flooding. Geomorphology 228:175–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Medalie L (2016) Concentration, flux, and trend estimates with uncertainty for nutrients, chloride, and total suspended solids in tributaries of Lake Champlain, 1990–2014: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016–1200.  https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161200
  31. Mitchell MJ, Driscoll CT, Kahl JS, Likens GE, Murdoch PS, Pardo LH (1996) Climatic control of nitrate loss from forested watersheds in the northeast United States. Environ Sci Technol 30:2609–2612.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es9600237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mullaney JR (2016) Nutrient, organic carbon, and chloride concentrations and loads in selected Long Island Sound tributaries—Four decades of change following the passage of the Federal Clean Water Act, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20155189
  33. Northeast Climate Impact Assessment (NECIA) (2006) Climate change in the U.S. Northeast: a report of the northeast climate impacts assessment. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, p 35Google Scholar
  34. Pellerin BA, Saraceno JF, Shanley JB, Sebestyen SD, Aiken GR, Wollheim WM, Bergamaschi BA (2012) Taking the pulse of snowmelt: in situ sensors reveal seasonal, event and diurnal patterns of nitrate and dissolved organic matter variability in an upland forest stream. Biogeochemistry 108:183–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9589-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peterson TC, Heim RR, Hirsch R, Kaiser DP, Brooks H, Diffenbaugh NS, Dole RM, Giovannettone JP, Guirguis K, Karl TR, Katz RW, Kunkel K, Lettenmaier D, McCabe GJ, Paciorek CJ, Ryberg KR, Schubert S, Silva VBS, Stewart BC, Vecchia AV, Villarini G, Vose RS, Walsh J, Wehner M, Wolock D, Wolter K, Woodhouse CA, Wuebbles D (2013) Monitoring and understanding changes in heat waves, cold waves, floods, and droughts in the United States: state of knowledge. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:821–834.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00066.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ralston DK, Warner JC, Geyer WR, Wall GR (2013) Sediment transport due to extreme events: the Hudson River estuary after tropical storms Irene and Lee. Geophys Res Lett 40:5451–5455.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rose LA, Karwan DL, Aufdenkampe AK. Sediment fingerprinting suggests differential particulate organic matter formation and transport processes across hydrologic regimes. JGR-Biogeosciences (in review)Google Scholar
  38. Sarojini BB, Stott PA, Black E, Polson D (2012) Fingerprints of changes in annual and seasonal precipitation from CMIP5 models over land and ocean. Geophys Res Lett 39:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053373 Google Scholar
  39. Sebestyen SD, Boyer EW, Shanley JB, Kendall C, Doctor DH, Aiken GR, Ohte N (2008) Sources, transformations, and hydrological processes that control stream nitrate and dissolved organic matter concentrations during snowmelt in an upland forest. Water Resour Res 44:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shanley JB, Sebestyen SD, Mcdonnell JJ, Mcglynn BL, Dunne T (2015) Water’s Way at Sleepers River watershed—revisiting flow generation in a post-glacial landscape, Vermont USA. Hydrol Process 29:3447–3459.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tetzlaff D, Carey SK, McNamara JP, Laudon H, Soulsby C (2017) The essential value of long-term experimental data for hydrology and water management. Water Resour Res 53:2598–2604.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020840.Received CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vidon P, Marchese S, Rook S (2017) Impact of Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee on riparian zone hydrology and biogeochemistry. Hydrol Process 31:476–488.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walter RC, Merritts DJ (2008) Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills. Science (80-) 319:299–304.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151716
  44. Watson KM, Collenburg JV, Reiser RG (2014) Hurricane Irene and associated floods of August 27–30, 2011, in New Jersey: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5234. http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20135234
  45. Williamson EK (2013) The effect of particle exchange on suspended sediment transport distances in the white clay creek, Pennsylvania. MS Thesis, University of DelawareGoogle Scholar
  46. Yellen B, Woodruff JD, Kratz LN, Mabee SB, Morrison J, Martini AM (2014) Source, conveyance and fate of suspended sediments following Hurricane Irene. New England, USA. Geomorphology 226:124–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.07.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yellen B, Woodruff JD, Cook TL, Newton RM (2016) Historically unprecedented erosion from Tropical Storm Irene due to high antecedent precipitation. Earth Surf Process Landforms 41:677–684.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yoon B, Raymond PA (2012) Dissolved organic matter export from a forested watershed during Hurricane Irene. Geophys Res Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl052785 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Vidon
    • 1
  • Diana L. Karwan
    • 2
  • A. Scott Andres
    • 3
  • Shreeram Inamdar
    • 4
  • Sujay Kaushal
    • 5
  • Jonathan Morrison
    • 6
  • John Mullaney
    • 6
  • Donald S. Ross
    • 7
  • Andrew W. Schroth
    • 8
  • James B. Shanley
    • 9
  • Byungman Yoon
    • 10
  1. 1.The State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY-ESF)SyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulUSA
  3. 3.Delaware Geological SurveyUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  4. 4.University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  5. 5.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  6. 6.U.S. Geological SurveyEast HartfordUSA
  7. 7.Department of Plant and Soil ScienceUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  8. 8.Department of GeologyUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  9. 9.U.S. Geological SurveyMontpelierUSA
  10. 10.Yale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations