Soil carbon stocks across tropical forests of Panama regulated by base cation effects on fine roots
- 468 Downloads
Tropical forests are the most carbon (C)-rich ecosystems on Earth, containing 25–40% of global terrestrial C stocks. While large-scale quantification of aboveground biomass in tropical forests has improved recently, soil C dynamics remain one of the largest sources of uncertainty in Earth system models, which inhibits our ability to predict future climate. Globally, soil texture and climate predict ≤ 30% of the variation in soil C stocks, so ecosystem models often predict soil C using measures of aboveground plant growth. However, this approach can underestimate tropical soil C stocks, and has proven inaccurate when compared with data for soil C in data-rich northern ecosystems. By quantifying soil organic C stocks to 1 m depth for 48 humid tropical forest plots across gradients of rainfall and soil fertility in Panama, we show that soil C does not correlate with common predictors used in models, such as plant biomass or litter production. Instead, a structural equation model including base cations, soil clay content, and rainfall as exogenous factors and root biomass as an endogenous factor predicted nearly 50% of the variation in tropical soil C stocks, indicating a strong indirect effect of base cation availability on tropical soil C storage. Including soil base cations in C cycle models, and thus emphasizing mechanistic links among nutrients, root biomass, and soil C stocks, will improve prediction of climate-soil feedbacks in tropical forests.
KeywordsAboveground biomass Clay Litterfall Phosphorus Precipitation Rainforest
Funding was provided by NSF GSS Grant #BCS-1437591 and DOE Grant DE-SC0015898 to D. F. Cusack, and NERC Grant NE/J011169/1 to O. T. Lewis. We thank Julio Rodriguez, Didimo Urena, David Brassfield, Evert Carlos Green, and Christian Harris for field support, and Dayana Agudo, Aleksandra Bielnicka, Dianne de la Cruz, Tania Romero, Irene Torres, Tyler Schappe and Stanley L. Walet for laboratory support. Assistance with map and graphics was provided by Matt Zebrowski, cartographer, at UCLA. Data supporting the conclusions is available in tables, figures, and SI.
- Asner G, Mascaro J, Anderson C, Knapp D, Martin R, Kennedy-Bowdoin T, van Breugel M, Davies S, Hall J, Muller-Landau H, Potvin C, Sousa W, Wright J, Bermingham E (2013) High-fidelity national carbon mapping for resource management and REDD+. Carbon Balance Manage 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-1188-1187
- Cusack DF, Chadwick OA, Hockaday WC, Vitousek PM (2013) Mineralogical controls on soil black carbon preservation. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 26(2):GB2019Google Scholar
- Gee G, Or D (2002) Particle size analysis. In: Dane J, Topp C (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 4—physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Wisconsin, pp 255–293Google Scholar
- Grossman R, Reinsch T (2002) Bulk density. In: Dane J, Topp C (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods. Soil Society of America, Wisconsin, pp 201–293Google Scholar
- IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://www.climatechange2013.org/report/full-report/ipcc
- Luo YQ, Ahlstrom A, Allison SD, Batjes NH, Brovkin V, Carvalhais N, Chappell A, Ciais P, Davidson EA, Finzi AC, Georgiou K, Guenet B, Hararuk O, Harden JW, He YJ, Hopkins F, Jiang LF, Koven C, Jackson RB, Jones CD, Lara MJ, Liang JY, McGuire AD, Parton W, Peng CH, Randerson JT, Salazar A, Sierra CA, Smith MJ, Tian HQ, Todd-Brown KEO, Torn M, van Groenigen KJ, Wang YP, West TO, Wei YX, Wieder WR, Xia JY, Xu X, Xu XF, Zhou T (2016) Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by earth system models. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 30(1):40–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Staff SS (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
- Stewart R, Stewart J, Woodring W (1980) Geologic map of the Panama Canal and vicinity, Republic of Panama. Map I-1232. United States Geological Survey, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Windsor D, Rand A, Rand W (1990) Caracteristicas de la Precipitacion de la Isla de Barro ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- Woodring W (1958) Geology of Barro Colorado Island, Collection 135:1–39. In: Smithsonian (ed) PanamaGoogle Scholar
- Wright SJ, Yavitt JB, Wurzburger N, Turner BL, Tanner EVJ, Sayer EJ, Santiago LS, Kaspari M, Hedin LO, Harms KE, Garcia MN, Corre MD (2011) Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation, tree growth, or litter production in a lowland tropical forest. Ecology 92(8):1616–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar