An integrated spectroscopic and wet chemical approach to investigate grass litter decomposition chemistry
- 710 Downloads
The chemical transformations that occur during litter decomposition are key processes for soil organic matter formation and terrestrial biogeochemistry; yet we still lack complete understanding of these chemical processes. Thus, we monitored the chemical composition of Andropogon gerardii (big bluestem grass) litter residue over a 36 month decomposition experiment in a prairie ecosystem using: traditional wet chemical fractionation based upon digestibility, solid state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The goals of this study were to (1) determine the chemical changes occurring during A. gerardii litter decomposition, and (2) compare the information obtained from each method to assess agreement. Overall, we observed a 97 % mass loss of the original litter, through a two-stage decomposition process. In the first stage, within 12 months, non-structural, cellulose and hemicellulose fractions not encrusted in lignin were preferentially and rapidly lost, while the acid unhydrolyzable residue (AUR) and microbial components increased. During the second stage, 12–36 months, all wet chemical fraction masses decreased equivalently and slowly with time, and the AUR and the lignin-encrusted cellulose fractions decomposition rates were comparable to each other. Method comparisons revealed that wet chemical fractionation did not accurately follow the initial litter structures, particularly lignin, likely because of chemical transformations and accumulation of microbial biomass. FTIR and NMR were able to determine bulk structural characteristics, and aid in elucidating chemical transformations but lacked the ability to measure absolute quantities of structural groups. As a result, we warn from the sole use of wet chemical methods, and strongly encourage coupling them with spectroscopic methods. Our results overall support the traditional chemical model of selective preservation of lignin, but shows that this is limited to the early stages of decomposition, while lignin is not selectively preserved at subsequent stages. Our study also provides important evidence regarding the impact of chemically different litter structures on decomposition rates and pathways.
KeywordsLitter decomposition Cellulose Hemicellulose Lignin NMR FTIR Grass Big bluestem
We would like to thank the Konza Prairie LTER and EcoCore laboratories for their support and use of their facilities. The work was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF)—Division of Environmental Biology grant #0918482, the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program, the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative postdoctoral fellowship grant # 2012-01330, and the Cotrufo-Hoppess fund for soil ecology research. The wet chemical work was carried out at the EcoCore analytical services facility at Colorado State University (http://ecocore.nrel.colostate.edu/) with the help of Dr Liping Qiu. A portion of the research was performed using EMSL, a DOE Office of Science User Facility sponsored by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research and located at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. We would like to thank the scientists at EMSL who assisted in running the NMR samples, particularly Dr. Sarah Burton.
The use of trade, firm, or corporation names is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the United States Department of Agriculture or the Agricultural Research Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program.
- Allen SE (1989) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Berg B, McClaugherty C (2007) Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Berg B, Staaf H (1980) Decomposition rate and chemical changes of Scots pine needle litter. II. Influence of chemical composition. Ecol Bull 32:373–390Google Scholar
- Coûteaux M-M, Bottner P, Berg B (1995) Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Tree 10:63–66Google Scholar
- Dann HM, Grant RJ, Van Amburgh ME, Van Soest PJ (2006) Lignin-carbohydrate linkages, lignin and the relationship with fiber digestibility. In: New York State College of Agriculture, and the Graduate School of Nutrition CU (ed) Proceedings of Cornell nutritive conference for feed manufacture, New York State College of Agriculture, and the Graduate School of Nutrition. Departments of Poultry Husbandry, Animal Husbandry, and Biochemistry and Nutrition, Cornell University, pp 87–98Google Scholar
- Ishler V, Varga G (2001) Carbohydrate nutrition for lactating dairy cattle. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PAGoogle Scholar
- Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Hartnett DC, Collins SL (1998) Grassland dynamics: long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie. The Long-term ecological research network series, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Lapierre C (1993) Application of new methods for the investigation of lignin structure. Forge cell wall structure and digestibility. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, pp 133–166Google Scholar
- Reeves JB, McCarty GW, Rutherford DW, Wershaw RL (2008) Mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopic examination of charred pine wood, bark, cellulose, and lignin: implications for the quantitative determination of charcoal in soils. Appl Spectrosc 62:182–189. doi: 10.1366/000370208783575618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith BC (2011) Fundamentals of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, 2nd edn. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
- Socrates G (1994) Infrared characteristic group frequencies, 2nd edn. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
- Spielvogel S, Prietzel J, Kögel-Knabner I et al (2010) Lignin phenols and cutin- and suberin-derived aliphatic monomers as biomarkers for stand history. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:A983–A983Google Scholar
- Udén P, Robinson PH, Wiseman J (2005) Use of detergent system terminology and criteria for submission of manuscripts on new, or revised, analytical methods as well as descriptive information on feed analysis and/or variability. Anim Feed Sci Technol 118:181–186. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Soest PJ, Wine RH (1967) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 46:50–55Google Scholar
- Van Soest PJ, Wine RH (1968) Determination of lignin and cellulose in acid-detergent fiber with permanganate. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 51:780–785Google Scholar