, Volume 126, Issue 3, pp 285–300 | Cite as

Stoichiometric impact of calcium carbonate deposition on nitrogen and phosphorus supplies in three montane streams

  • Jessica R. Corman
  • Eric K. Moody
  • James J. Elser


The absolute concentrations of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) and their relative availabilities (N:P stoichiometry) can influence numerous ecological processes. In streams, N:P stoichiometry is influenced by different hydrologic and biogeochemical processes that also affect the downstream transport of these nutrients to receiving waters. Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) deposition, a widespread geochemical process in alkaline streams and other aquatic ecosystems, can lower phosphate concentrations and, potentially, decrease P availability relative to N availability. We evaluated the effects of CaCO3 deposition on stream water stoichiometry using a 3-year dataset of stream physicochemistry and several metrics of CaCO3 deposition across three streams in the Huachuca Mountains of southern Arizona, USA. CaCO3 deposition rates varied across and within streams, with benthic coverage of travertine as high as 70 % and deposition rates up to 8.3 μg Ca2+ L−1 m−1. Redundancy analysis revealed a strong, negative correlation between stream water phosphate concentrations and CaCO3 deposition rates, a relationship that also extended to total P concentrations, and a strong, positive correlation between inorganic N concentrations and CaCO3 deposition rates. Furthermore, we found a significant positive relationship between CaCO3 deposition rates and N:P ratios. These results support the role of coprecipitation of phosphate with CaCO3 deposition in reducing P supply. They also suggest that reduced concentrations of P in the water column may reduce biological N uptake, amplifying the stoichiometric signal of CaCO3 deposition.


Calcium carbonate Nutrient cycling Streams Stoichiometry Redundancy analysis 



The authors would like to thank Nicole Nevarez, Megan (Brundage) Freeman, Robin Greene, Chanelle Hope, Cathy Kochert, Roy Erickson, Krist Rouypirom, Joseph Rittenhouse, Elizabeth Gaige, and all other members of Traverteam for help with field and laboratory analyses. Thank you to Sheridan Stone (US Department of Defense, Fort Huachuca) and Brooke Gebow (The Nature Conservancy, Ramsey Canyon Nature Preserve) for logistical support. This work was supported in-kind by a Department of Defense Strategic Environment Research and Development Project (SERDP, RC-1726) and with funding to JRC from Science Foundation Arizona, the Achievement Rewards for College Scholars (ARCS) Program, the California Lake Management Society, and the ASU Graduate and Professional Student Association Graduate Research Support Program and to JJE from the US National Science Foundation (DEB-0950175) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Astrobiology Program (NAI5-0018). This manuscript was much improved by feedback from Nancy Grimm, Michelle McCrackin, Daniel Childers, and three anonymous reviewers.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10533_2015_156_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (274 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 274 kb)


  1. Alexander RB, Boyer EW, Smith RA, Schwarz GE, Moore RB (2007) The role of headwater streams in downstream water quality. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43:41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA-AWWA-WEF, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Arvin E, Jenkins D (1985) Biological removal of phosphorus from wastewater. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 15:25–64Google Scholar
  4. Aspila KI, Agemian H, Chau ASY (1976) A semi-automatic method for the determination of inorganic, organic and total phosphate in sediments. Analyst 101:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Auqué L, Arenas C, Osácar C, Pardo G, Sancho C, Vázquez-Urbez M (2013) Tufa sedimentation in changing hydrological conditions: the River Mesa (Spain). Geol Acta 11:85–102Google Scholar
  6. Austnes K, Evans C, Eliot-Laize C, Naden P, Old G (2010) Effects of storm events on mobilisation and in-stream processing of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a Welsh peatland catchment. Biogeochemistry 99:157–173. doi: 10.1007/s10533-009-9399-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Avilés A, Rodero J, Amores V, de Vicente I, Rodríguez MI, Niell FX (2006) Factors controlling phosphorus speciation in a Mediterranean Basin (River Guadalfeo, Spain). J Hydrol 331:396–408. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernal S, Lupon A, Ribot M, Sabater F, Martí E (2015) Riparian and in-stream controls on nutrient concentrations and fluxes in a headwater forest stream. Biogeosciences 12:1941–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bissett A, de Beer D, Schoon R, Shiraishi F, Reimer A, Arp G (2008) Microbial mediation of stromatolite formation in karst-water creeks. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borovec J, Sirová D, Mošnerová P, Rejmánková E, Vrba J (2010) Spatial and temporal changes in phosphorus partitioning within a freshwater cyanobacterial mat community. Biogeochemistry 101:323–333. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9488-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyer M, Wheeler B (1989) Vegetation patterns in spring-fed calcareous fens: calcite precipitation and constraints on fertility. J Ecol 77:597–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown DE (ed) (1994) Biotic communities: southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake CityGoogle Scholar
  13. Carter CD, Marks JC (2007) Influences of travertine dam formation on leaf litter decomposition and algal accrual. Hydrobiologia 575:329–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Casas J, Gessner M (1999) Leaf litter breakdown in a Mediterranean stream characterised by travertine precipitation. Freshw Biol 41:781–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Casey H, Farr I (1982) The influence of within-stream disturbance on dissolved nutrient levels during spates. Hydrobiologia 91:447–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chave KE (1965) Carbonates: association with organic matter in surface seawater. Science 148:1723–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chergui H, Pattee E (1990) The influence of season on the breakdown of submerged leaves. Arch Hydrobiol 120:1–12Google Scholar
  18. Cohen MJ, Kurz MJ, Heffernan JB, Martin JB, Douglas RL, Foster CR, Thomas RG (2013) Diel phosphorus variation and the stoichiometry of ecosystem metabolism in a large spring-fed river. Ecol Monogr 83:155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dahm CN, Baker MA, Moore DI, Thibault JR (2003) Coupled biogeochemical and hydrological responses of streams and rivers to drought. Freshw Biol 48:1219–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Demars BO (2008) Whole-stream phosphorus cycling: testing methods to assess the effect of saturation of sorption capacity on nutrient uptake length measurements. Water Res 42:2507–2516. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dodds WK, Oakes RM (2008) Headwater influences on downstream water quality. Environ Manag 41:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dodds WK, Welch EB (2000) Establishing nutrient criteria in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:186–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dorioz J, Pilleboue E, Ferhi A (1989) Phosphorus dynamics in watersheds: role of trapping processes in sediments [Dynamique du phosphore dans les bassins versants: importance des phenomenes de retention dans les sediments]. Water Res 23:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Downing JA, McCauley E (1992) The nitrogen:phosphorus relationship in lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 37:936–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drysdale RN, Taylor MP, Ihlenfeld C (2002) Factors controlling the chemical evolution of travertine-depositing rivers of the Barkly karst, northern Australia. Hydrol Process 16:2941–2962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dupraz C, Visscher PT (2005) Microbial lithification in marine stromatolites and hypersaline mats. Trends Microbiol 13:429–438. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elser JJ et al (2005) Effects of phosphorus enrichment and grazing snails on modern stromatolitic microbial communities. Freshw Biol 50:1808–1825. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01451.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Elser JJ et al (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01113.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferreira V, Chauvet E (2011) Future increase in temperature more than decrease in litter quality can affect microbial litter decomposition in streams. Oecologia 167:279–291. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-1976-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fisher SG, Sponseller RA, Heffernan JB (2004) Horizons in stream biogeochemistry: flowpaths to progress. Ecology 85:2369–2379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Francoeur SN (2001) Meta-analysis of lotic nutrient amendment experiments: detecting and quantifying subtle responses. J N Am Benthol Soc 20:358–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Geisser S, Greenhouse SW (1958) An extension of box’s results on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. Ann Math Stat 29:885–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grimm NB (1992) Biogeochemistry of nitrogen in Sonoran Desert streams. J Ariz Nev Acad Sci 26:139–155Google Scholar
  34. Grimm NB, Fisher SG (1986) Nitrogen limitation in a Sonoran Desert stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 5:2–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hagerthey SE, Bellinger BJ, Wheeler K, Gantar M, Gaiser E (2011) Everglades periphyton: a biogeochemical perspective. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:309–343. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2010.531218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hamilton SK, Bruesewitz DA, Horst GP, Weed DB, Sarnelle O (2009) Biogenic calcite–phosphorus precipitation as a negative feedback to lake eutrophication. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:343–350. doi: 10.1139/f09-003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Herman JS, Lorah MM (1987) CO2 outgassing and calcite precipitation in Falling Spring Creek, Virginia, U.S.A. Chem Geol 62:251–262. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(87)90090-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill AR (1996) Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. J Environ Qual 25:743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. House W (1990) The prediction of phosphate coprecipitation with calcite in freshwaters. Water Res 24:1017–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. House WA (2003) Geochemical cycling of phosphorus in rivers. Appl Geochem 18:739–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. House WA, Denison FH (1997) Nutrient dynamics in a lowland stream impacted by sewage effluent: Great Ouse, England. Sci Total Environ 205:25–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. House WA, Donaldson L (1986) Adsorption and coprecipitation of phosphate on calcite. J Colloid Interface Sci 112:309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. House WA, Casey H, Smith S (1986) Factors affecting the coprecipitation of inorganic phosphate with calcite in hardwaters—II. Water Res 20:923–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hu YB, Dieckmann GS, Wolf-Gladrow DA, Nehrke G (2014) Laboratory study on coprecipitation of phosphate with ikaite in sea ice. J Geophys Res Oceans 119:7007–7015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jacobson RL, Langmuir D (1970) The chemical history of some spring waters in carbonate rocks. Groundwater 8:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jaeger K, Olden J (2012) Electrical resistance sensor arrays as a means to quantify longitudinal connectivity of rivers. River Res Appl 28:1843–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jäger P, Röhrs J (1990) Phosphorfällung über Calciumcarbonat im eutrophen Wallersee (Salzburger Alpenvorland, Österreich). [Coprecipitation of phosphorus with calcite in the eutrophic Wallersee (Alpine Foreland of Salzburg, Austria)]. Int Rev gesamten Hydrobiol Hydrogr 75:153–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jarvie H et al (2002) Phosphorus uptake into algal biofilms in a lowland chalk river. Sci Total Environ 282:353–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jarvie HP, Jürgens MD, Williams RJ, Neal C, Davies JJ, Barrett C, White J (2005) Role of river bed sediments as sources and sinks of phosphorus across two major eutrophic UK river basins: the Hampshire Avon and Herefordshire Wye. J Hydrol 304:51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jarvie HP, Neal C, Withers PJ (2006) Sewage-effluent phosphorus: a greater risk to river eutrophication than agricultural phosphorus? Sci Total Environ 360:246–253. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jenkins D, Ferguson JF, Menar AB (1971) Chemical processes for phosphate removal. Water Res 5:369–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kleiner J (1988) Coprecipitation of phosphate with calcite in lake water: a laboratory experiment modelling phosphorus removal with calcite in Lake Constance. Water Res 22:1259–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Liu Z, Sun H, Baoying L, Xiangling L, Wenbing Y, Cheng Z (2010) Wet–dry seasonal variations of hydrochemistry and carbonate precipitation rates in a travertine-depositing canal at Baishuitai, Yunnan, SW China: implications for the formation of biannual laminae in travertine and for climatic reconstruction. Chem Geol 273:258–266. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.02.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lorah MM, Herman JS (1988) The chemical evolution of a travertine-depositing stream: geochemical processes and mass transfer reactions. Water Resour Res 24:1541–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lu G, Zheng C, Donahoe R, Berry Lyons W (2000) Controlling processes in a CaCO3 precipitating stream in Huanglong Natural Scenic District, Sichuan, China. J Hydrol 230:34–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Malusa J, Overby ST, Parnell RA (2003) Potential for travertine formation. Appl Geochem 18:1081–1093. doi: 10.1016/s0883-2927(02)00241-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marks JC, Parnell R, Carter C, Dinger EC, Haden GA (2006) Interactions between geomorphology and ecosystem processes in travertine streams: implications for decommissioning a dam on Fossil Creek, Arizona. Geomorphology 77:299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Martínez A, Pérez J, Molinero J, Sagarduy M, Pozo J (2014) Effects of flow scarcity on leaf-litter processing under oceanic climate conditions in calcareous streams. Sci Total Environ 503–504:251–257Google Scholar
  60. Mattsson T, Kortelainen P, Räike A, Lepistö A, Thomas DN (2015) Spatial and temporal variability of organic C and N concentrations and export from 30 boreal rivers induced by land use and climate. Sci Total Environ 508:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McDiffett WF, Beidler AW, Dominick TF, McCrea KD (1989) Nutrient concentration–stream discharge relationships during storm events in a first-order stream. Hydrobiologia 179:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McGarigal K, Cushman S, Stafford SG (2000) Multivariate statistics for wildlife and ecology research. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Merz-Preiß M, Riding R (1999) Cyanobacterial tufa calcification in two freshwater streams: ambient environment, chemical thresholds and biological processes. Sediment Geol 126:103–124. doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00035-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Meyer JL, Likens GE (1979) Transport and transformation of phosphorus in a forest stream ecosystem. Ecology 60:1255–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Meyer JL et al (1988) Elemental dynamics in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 7:410–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Milisa M, Belancic A, Kepčija RMk, Sertic-Peric M, Ostojic A, Habdija I (2010) Calcite deposition in karst waters is promoted by leaf litter breakdown and vice versa. Ann Limnol 46:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mooshammer M et al (2012) Stoichiometric controls of nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in decomposing beech leaf litter. Ecology 93:770–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mulholland PJ (2004) The importance of in-stream uptake for regulating stream concentrations and outputs of N and P from a forested watershed: evidence from long-term chemistry records for Walker Branch Watershed. Biogeochemistry 70:403–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mulholland PJ, Hill WR (1997) Seasonal patterns in streamwater nutrient and dissolved organic carbon concentrations: separating catchment flow path and in-stream effects. Water Resour Res 33:1297–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mulholland PJ, Webster JR (2010) Nutrient dynamics in streams and the role of J-NABS. J N Am Benthol Soc 29:100–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Neal C (1999) The potential for phosphorus pollution remediation by calcite precipitation in UK freshwaters. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 5:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Noe GB, Childers DL, Jones RD (2001) Phosphorus biogeochemistry and the impact of phosphorus enrichment: why is the Everglades so unique? Ecosystems 4:603–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Oksanen J et al (2013) Vegan: community ecology package, R package version 2.1-10. Accessed 22 Aug 2014
  74. Otsuki A, Wetzel RG (1972) Coprecipitation of phosphate with carbonates in a marl lake. Limnol Oceanogr 17:763–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (1999) Description of input and examples for PHREEQC (version 3)—a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. Techniques and Methods 6–A43, U.S. Geological Survey, 519 ppGoogle Scholar
  76. Pentecost A (2005) Travertine. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  77. Peterson BJ et al (2001) Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams. Science 292:86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pinheiro J, Bates D, Debroy S, Sarkar D, Team RC (2014) nlme: linear and non-linear mixed effects models, R package version 3.1-117. Acessed 22 Aug 2014
  79. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Core Team, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  80. Redfield AC (1958) The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci 46:205–221Google Scholar
  81. Ruff H, Maier G (2000) Calcium carbonate deposits reduce predation pressure on Gammarus fossarum from salamander larvae. Freshw Biol 43:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sardans J, Rivas-Ubach A, Peñuelas J (2012) The C:N:P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: a review and perspectives. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 14:33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schade JD et al (2011) The stoichiometry of nitrogen and phosphorus spiralling in heterotrophic and autotrophic streams. Freshw Biol 56:424–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02509.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith VH (1983) Low nitrogen to phosphorus ratios favor dominance by blue-green algae in lake phytoplankton. Science 221:669–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Solorzano L, Sharp JH (1980) Determination of total dissolved phosphorus and particulate phosphorus in natural waters. Limnol Oceanogr 25:754–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  87. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Needham HeightsGoogle Scholar
  88. ter Braak CJ, Prentice IC, Caswell H (1988) A theory of gradient analysis. Adv Ecol Res 34:235–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Triska FJ, Jackman AP, Duff JH, Avanzino RJ (1994) Ammonium sorption to channel and riparian sediments: a transient storage pool for dissolved inorganic nitrogen. Biogeochemistry 26:67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Withers P, Jarvie H (2008) Delivery and cycling of phosphorus in rivers: a review. Sci Total Environ 400:379–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. WRRC (2014) Monthly climate summary, Fort Huachuca, Arizona. Western Regional Climate Center. Accessed 16 Nov 2014

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica R. Corman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eric K. Moody
    • 1
  • James J. Elser
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Center for LimnologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations