, Volume 125, Issue 3, pp 427–436 | Cite as

Using 2D NMR spectroscopy to assess effects of UV radiation on cell wall chemistry during litter decomposition

  • Yang LinEmail author
  • Jennifer Y. King
  • Steven D. Karlen
  • John Ralph


Litter chemistry is one of the most studied controls on decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Solar radiation has been shown to increase litter decomposition rates in arid ecosystems through the process of photodegradation. However, it remains unclear how photodegradation affects litter chemistry, especially the abundance and composition of lignin, which is thought to play a key role in photodegradation. Using two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (2D NMR) spectroscopic methods, we quantified the molecular-level changes in litter chemistry associated with photodegradation. Litter of Bromus diandrus was exposed in the field to two levels of radiation [with and without ultraviolet (UV) wavelengths] and two durations of exposure (2.5 months during summer, and 1 year). Through fiber analysis by sequential digestion, we found that the litter hemicellulose fraction decreased significantly from 31.6 to 24.9 % after 1 year of decomposition. In litter exposed for 1 year, the hemicellulose fraction was significantly lower in litter with UV exposure compared to litter without UV exposure (23.8 vs. 25.9 %). These results indicate that UV photodegradation has a small but significant effect on litter chemistry compared to other decomposition processes. Even though fiber analysis showed no loss of total lignin, 2D NMR analysis demonstrated that UV exposure reduced the major lignin structural units containing β-aryl ether inter-unit linkages by 9 % and decreased the relative abundance of lignin p-hydroxyphenyl units by 20 %. The 2D NMR analysis also revealed that lignin guaiacyl units were preferentially lost after 1 year of decomposition relative to the reference material, but no effects of UV exposure on guaiacyl units were observed. These results suggest that photodegradation causes partial degradation, not necessarily complete breakdown, of lignin structures. Our data also demonstrate that applications of 2D NMR methods are valuable for acquiring detailed information on lignin and polysaccharide chemistry during both biotic and abiotic decomposition processes.


Photo-oxidation Photo-mineralization Photo-priming Cellulose Dryland HSQC (heteronuclear single-quantum coherence) 



We thank Dad Roux-Michollet, Keri Opalk, Sarah Liu, and Jerry Hu for their assistance in the field and laboratory. We thank Oliver Chadwick and Carla D’Antonio for their valuable comments on the experimental design and on this manuscript. We thank Kate McCurdy, Eric Massey, and the University of California’s Sedgwick Reserve for providing the study site. Comments from Associate Editor Marc Kramer and four anonymous reviewers greatly improved this manuscript. YL and JK were supported by the National Science Foundation under DEB-0935984 and DEB-1406501. JR and SK were supported by the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE Office of Science BER DE-FC02-07ER64494).

Supplementary material

10533_2015_132_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)


  1. Adair EC, Parton WJ, Del Grosso SJ, Silver WL, Harmon ME, Hall SA, Burke IC, Hart SC (2008) Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates. Global Change Biol 14:2636–2660Google Scholar
  2. Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin BAZ, Chabbert B, Moorhead D, Bertrand I (2014) Impact of fine litter chemistry on lignocellulolytic enzyme efficiency during decomposition of maize leaf and root in soil. Biogeochemistry 117:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyropoulos DS, Sun Y (1996) Photochemically induced solid-state degradation, condensation, and rearrangement reactions in lignin model compounds and milled wood lignin. Photochem Photobiol 64:510–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin AT, Ballaré CL (2010) Dual role of lignin in plant litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:2–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bahri H, Dignac M-F, Rumpel C, Rasse DP, Chenu C, Mariotti A (2006) Lignin turnover kinetics in an agricultural soil is monomer specific. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1977–1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker NR, Allison SD (2015) Ultraviolet photodegradation facilitates microbial litter decomposition in a Mediterranean climate. Ecology 96:1994–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertrand I, Chabbert B, Kurek B, Recous S (2006) Can the biochemical features and histology of wheat residues explain their decomposition in soil? Plant Soil 281:291–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biely P (2012) Microbial carbohydrate esterases deacetylating plant polysaccharides. Biotechnol Adv 30:1575–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bornman JF, Barnes PW, Robinson SA, Ballare CL, Flint SD, Caldwell MM (2015) Solar ultraviolet radiation and ozone depletion-driven climate change: effects on terrestrial ecosystems. Photochem Photobiol Sci 14:88–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandt LA, King JY, Milchunas DG (2007) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on litter decomposition depend on precipitation and litter chemistry in a shortgrass steppe ecosystem. Global Change Biol 13:2193–2205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brandt LA, Bohnet C, King JY (2009) Photochemically induced carbon dioxide production as a mechanism for carbon loss from plant litter in arid ecosystems. J Geophys Res 114:G02004Google Scholar
  13. Brandt LA, King JY, Hobbie SE, Milchunas DG, Sinsabaugh RL (2010) The role of photodegradation in surface litter decomposition across a grassland ecosystem precipitation gradient. Ecosystems 13:765–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christman RF, Oglesby RT (1971) Microbiological degradation and the formation of humus. In: Sarkanen KV, Ludwig CH (eds) Lignins: Occurrence, Formation, Structure and Reactions. Wiley, New York, pp 769–793Google Scholar
  15. Couˆteaux M-M, Bottner P, Berg B (1995) Litter decomposition, climate and liter quality. Trends Ecol Evol 10:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dirks I, Navon Y, Kanas D, Dumbur R, Grünzweig J (2010) Atmospheric water vapor as driver of litter decomposition in Mediterranean shrubland and grassland during rainless seasons. Global Change Biol 16:2799–2812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feng X, Hills KM, Simpson AJ, Whalen JK, Simpson MJ (2011) The role of biodegradation and photo-oxidation in the transformation of terrigenous organic matter. Org Geochem 42:262–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foereid B, Bellarby J, Meier-Augenstein W, Kemp H (2010) Does light exposure make plant litter more degradable? Plant Soil 333:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frouz J, Cajthaml T, Mudrák O (2011) The effect of lignin photodegradation on decomposability of Calamagrostis epigeios grass litter. Biodegradation 22:1247–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. George B, Suttie E, Merlin A, Deglise X (2005) Photodegradation and photostabilisation of wood - the state of the art. Polym Degrad Stab 88:268–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ishigaki T, Sugano W, Ike M, Taniguchi H, Goto T, Fujita M (2002) Effect of UV irradiation on enzymatic degradation of cellulose acetate. Polym Degrad Stab 78:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jang J, Lee H, Lyoo W (2007) Effect of UV irradiation on cellulase degradation of cellulose acetate containing TiO2. Fiber Polym 8:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim H, Ralph J (2010) Solution-state 2D NMR of ball-milled plant cell wall gels in DMSO-d6/pyridine-d5. Org Biomol Chem 8:576–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim H, Ralph J, Akiyama T (2008) Solution-state 2D NMR of ball-milled plant cell wall gels in DMSO-d6. Bioenergy Res 1:56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King JY, Brandt LA, Adair EC (2012) Shedding light on plant litter decomposition: advances, implications and new directions in understanding the role of photodegradation. Biogeochemistry 111:57–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirschbaum MUF, Lambie SM, Zhou H (2011) No UV enhancement of litter decomposition observed on dry samples under controlled laboratory conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1300–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kögel I (1986) Estimation and decomposition pattern of the lignin component in forest humus layers. Soil Biol Biochem 18:589–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lanzalunga O, Bietti M (2000) Photo-and radiation chemical induced degradation of lignin model compounds. Photochem Photobiol 56:85–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee H, Rahn T, Throop H (2012) An accounting of C-based trace gas release during abiotic plant litter degradation. Global Change Biol 18:1185–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin Y, King, JY (2014) Effects of UV exposure and litter position on decomposition in a California grassland. Ecosystems 17(1):158–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundquist K, Lundgren R (1972) Acid degradation of lignin. Acta Chem Scand 26:2005–2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mansfield SD, Kim H, Lu F, Ralph J (2012) Whole plant cell wall characterization using solution-state 2D NMR. Nat Protoc 7:1579–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mayer LM, Thornton KR, Schick LL, Jastrow JD, Harden JW (2012) Photodissolution of soil organic matter. Geoderma 170:314–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moore TR, Trofymow JA, Taylor B, Prescott C, Camire C, Duschene L, Fyles J, Kozak L, Kranabetter M, Morrison I (1999) Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests. Global Change Biol 5:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parton W, Silver WL, Burke IC, Grassens L, Harmon ME, Currie WS, King JY, Adair EC, Brandt LA, Hart SC (2007) Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315:361–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petrik DL, Karlen SD, Cass CL, Padmakshan D, Lu F, Liu S, Le Bris P, Antelme S, Santoro N, Wilkerson CG, Sibout R, Lapierre C, Ralph J, Sedbrook JC (2014) p-Coumaroyl-CoA:monolignol transferase (PMT) acts specifically in the lignin biosynthetic pathway in Brachypodium distachyon. Plant J 77:713–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Puls J, Wilson SA, Hölter D (2011) Degradation of cellulose acetate-based materials: a review. J Polym Environ 19:152–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quideau SA, Graham RC, Oh SW, Hendrix PF, Wasylishen RE (2005) Leaf litter decomposition in a chaparral ecosystem, Southern California. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1988–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ralph SA, Ralph J, Landucci LL (2004) NMR database of lignin and cell wall model compounds. November 2004.
  42. Samuel R, Foston M, Jiang N, Allison L, Ragauskas AJ (2011) Structural changes in switchgrass lignin and hemicelluloses during pretreatments by NMR analysis. Polym Degrad Stab 96:2002–2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schade GW, Hofmann R-M, Crutzen PJ (1999) CO emissions from degrading plant matter, I: Measurements. Tellus B 51:889–908. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-4-00003.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schaefer D, Steinberger Y, Whitford WG (1985) The failure of nitrogen and lignin control of decomposition in a North American desert. Oecologia 65:382–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Song X, Peng C, Jiang H, Zhu Q, Wang W (2013) Direct and indirect effects of UV-B exposure on litter decomposition: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 8:e68858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Song X, Jiang H, Zhang Z, Zhou G, Zhang S, Peng C (2014) Interactive effects of elevated UV-B radiation and N deposition on decomposition of Moso bamboo litter. Soil Biol Biochem 69:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Talbot JM, Yelle DJ, Nowick J, Treseder KK (2011) Litter decay rates are determined by lignin chemistry. Biogeochemistry 108:279–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Soest PJ (1963) Use of detergents in analysis of fibrous feeds: a rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. J Ass Offic Agr Chem 46:829–835Google Scholar
  49. Wang J, Liu L, Wang X, Chen Y (2015) The interaction between abiotic photodegradation and microbial decomposition under ultraviolet radiation. Global Change Biol 21:2095–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilkerson CG, Mansfield SD, Lu F, Withers S, Park JY, Karlen SD, Gonzales-Vigil E, Padmakshan D, Unda F, Rencoret J, Ralph J (2014) Monolignol ferulate transferase introduces chemically labile linkages into the lignin backbone. Science 344:90–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamagishi T, Yoshimoto T, Minami K (1970) Photodegradation of wood. VII. Isolation and photodegradation of O-acetylated xylan (hemicellulose) from Linden wood. J Jpn Wood Res Soc 16:87–91Google Scholar
  52. Yelle DJ, Kaparaju P, Hunt CG, Hirth K, Kim H, Ralph J, Felby C (2013) Two-Dimensional NMR evidence for cleavage of lignin and xylan substituents in wheat straw through hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioenergy Res 6:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, The Wisconsin Energy InstituteUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiochemistryUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations