, Volume 122, Issue 2–3, pp 327–342 | Cite as

Sea spray, trace elements, and decomposition patterns as possible constraints on the evolution of CH4 and CO2 concentrations and isotopic signatures in oceanic ombrotrophic bogs

  • T. Broder
  • C. Blodau
  • H. Biester
  • K. H. KnorrEmail author


Ombrotrophic, oceanic bogs in southern Patagonia have not yet been studied with respect to ongoing belowground organic matter decomposition. To obtain such information we analyzed three sites differing in precipitation and sea spray input and quantified concentration patterns and 12/13C isotopic composition of CO2 and CH4 and iron, sulfur and trace metal contents that can influence decomposition. Concentrations of CO2 and CH4 increased with depth and reached 4,000–6,000 µmol L−1 of CO2 and 500–1,400 µmol L−1 of CH4. Chamber surface fluxes ranged from 40 to 62 mmol m−2 day−1 for CO2 and were not detectable for CH4 (<0.2 mmol m−2 day−1). Lowest gaseous C concentrations and fluxes occurred at the driest site under high sea spray input, which was accompanied by a higher degree of decomposition. Isotope fractionation factors αc ranged from 1.047 to 1.077 and suggested a predominance of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. The lower CH4 concentrations at one particular site may have been caused by a number of processes but isotope mass balances indicated a preferential loss of CH4 at all sites, especially at the site of lowest CH4 concentrations. Low CH4 concentrations were found under a high sea spray input and higher sulfate and reduced inorganic sulfur contents, suggesting a potential for attenuation of methanogenesis by sulfate reduction. All sites were characterized by very low Nickel concentrations of mostly <15 nmol L−1 and low concentrations of other essential trace elements that may further inhibit methanogenesis but also methanotrophy. The Patagonian sites fell within the reported range of CO2 and CH4 concentrations and depth patterns, and isotopic composition of the gases at northern sites despite different vegetation composition and seemingly lower surface fluxes. Fairly high sulfate and low trace element concentrations due to differences in atmospheric deposition may locally modify the decomposition patterns.


Carbon mineralization Peatlands Methanogenesis Decomposition Patagonia Stable isotopes Micronutrients 



This study was in part supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grants to H. Biester and C. Blodau, and a travel grant of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Limnologie (DGL) to KH. Knorr. Stable Isotope measurements were conducted at the BayCEER Laboratory of Isotope-Biogeochemistry, headed by G. Gebauer. The assistance of Silke Hammer, Martina Rohr, Karin Söllner, Heidi Zier, Yvonne Hermanns, and Ina Reisen is greatly acknowledged. We thank Mr. and Mrs. Friedli and Mr. Fernandez for providing access to sites.


  1. Aerts R, Ludwig F (1997) Water-table changes and nutritional status affect trace gas emissions from laboratory columns of peatland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1691–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basiliko N, Yavitt JB (2001) Influence of Ni Co, Fe, and Na additions on methane production in Sphagnum-dominated Northern American peatlands. Biogeochemistry 52:133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beer J, Blodau C (2007) Transport and thermodynamics constrain belowground carbon turnover in a northern peatland. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:2989–3002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beer J, Lee K, Whiticar M, Blodau C (2008) Geochemical controls on anaerobic organic matter decomposition in a northern peatland. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1393–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergman I, Lundberg P, Nilsson M (1999) Microbial carbon mineralisation in an acid surface peat: effects of environmental factors in laboratory incubations. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1867–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biester H, Martinez-Cortizas A, Birkenstock S, Kilian R (2003) Effect of peat decomposition and mass loss on historic mercury records in peat bogs from Patagonia. Environ Sci Technol 37:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biester H, Keppler F, Putschew A, Martinez-Cortizas A, Petri M (2004) Halogen retention, organohalogens, and the role of organic matter decomposition on halogen enrichment in two Chilean peat bogs. Environ Sci Technol 38:1984–1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blodau C (2002) Carbon cycling in peatlands—a review of processes and controls. Environ Rev 10:111–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blodau C, Moore TR (2003) Experimental response of peatland carbon dynamics to a water table fluctuation. Aquat Sci 65:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blodau C, Mayer B, Peiffer S, Moore TR (2007) Support for an anaerobic sulfur cycle in two Canadian peatland soils. J Geophys Res 112:G02004Google Scholar
  11. Boehme SE, Blair NE, Chanton JP, Martens CS (1996) A mass balance of C-13 and C-12 in an organic-rich methane-producing marine sediment. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:3835–3848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bragazza L, Siffi C, Iacumin P, Gerdol R (2007) Mass loss and nutrient release during litter decay in peatland: the role of microbial adaptability to litter chemistry. Soil Biol Biochem 39:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Updegraff K, Malterer TJ, Johnson K, Harth C, Chen JQ (1999) Ecosystem control over temperature and energy flux in northern peatlands. Ecol Appl 9:1345–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Broder T, Blodau C, Biester H, Knorr KH (2012) Peat decomposition records in three pristine ombrotrophic bogs in southern Patagonia. Biogeosciences 9:1479–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chanton JP, Bauer JE, Glaser PA, Siegel DI, Kelley CA, Tyler SC, Romanowicz EH, Lazrus A (1995) Radiocarbon evidence for the substrates supporting methane formation within northern Minnesota peatlands. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:3663–3668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chasar LS, Chanton JP, Glaser PH, Siegel DI, Rivers JS (2000) Radiocarbon and stable carbon isotopic evidence for transport and transformation of dissolved organic carbon, dissolved inorganic carbon, and CH4 in a northern Minnesota peatland. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 14:1095–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheburkin AK, Shotyk W (1996) An Energy-dispersive Miniprobe Multielement Analyzer (EMMA) for direct analysis of Pb and other trace elements in peats. Fresenius J Anal Chem 354:688–691Google Scholar
  18. Conrad R (2005) Quantification of methanogenic pathways using stable carbon isotopic signatures: a review and a proposal. Org Geochem 36:739–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corbett JE, Tfaily MM, Burdige DJ, Cooper WT, Glaser PH, Chanton JP (2013) Partitioning pathways of CO2 production in peatlands with stable carbon isotopes. Biogeochemistry 114:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FechnerLevy EJ, Hemond HF (1996) Trapped methane volume and potential effects on methane ebullition in a northern peatland. Limnol Oceanogr 41:1375–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fletcher SEM, Tans PP, Bruhwiler LM, Miller JB, Heimann M (2004) CH4 sources estimated from atmospheric observations of CH4 and its 13C/12C isotopic ratios: 1. Inverse modeling of source processes. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18:17Google Scholar
  22. Fritz C, Pancotto VA, Elzenga JTM, Visser EJW, Grootjans AP, Pol A, Iturraspe R, Roelofs JGM, Smolders AJP (2011) Zero methane emission bogs: extreme rhizosphere oxygenation by cushion plants in Patagonia. New Phytol 190:398–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gauci V, Matthews E, Dise N, Walter B, Koch D, Granberg G, Vile M (2004) Sulfur pollution suppression of the wetland methane source in the 20th and 21st centuries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12583–12587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Godoy R, Paulino L, Oyarzun C, Boeckx P (2003) Atmospheric N deposition in central and southern Chile. An overview. Gayana Bot 60:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gorham E (1991) Northern peatlands: role in the carbon-cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol Appl 1:182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heitmann T, Goldhammer T, Beer J, Blodau C (2007) Electron transfer of dissolved organic matter and its potential significance for anaerobic respiration in a northern bog. Glob Change Biol 13:1771–1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heusser CJ, Heusser LE, Lowell TV, Moreira A, Moreira S (2000) Deglacial palaeoclimate at Puerto del Hambre, subantarctic Patagonia, Chile. J Quat Sci 15:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hofmann K, Hamm R (1967) Determination of hydrogen sulfide with N, N-dimethyl-p-phenylene diamine and iron(III) chloride. Z Anal Chem Fresenius 232:161–167Google Scholar
  29. Hornibrook ERC, Longstaffe FJ, Fyfe WS (1997) Spatial distribution of microbial methane production pathways in temperate zone wetland soils: stable carbon and hydrogen isotope evidence. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes PDM, Mallon G, Brown A, Essex HJ, Stanford JD, Hotes S (2013) The impact of high tephra loading on late-Holocene carbon accumulation and vegetation succession in peatland communities. Quat Sci Rev 67:160–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IFM-GEOMAR (2011) Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften an der Universität Kiel, SFB 574. Accessed 26 Feb 2011
  32. Jarrell KF, Kalmokoff ML (1988) Nutritional requirements of the methanogenic archaebacteria. Can J Microbiol 34:557–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kammann C, Grunhage L, Jager HJ (2001) A new sampling technique to monitor concentrations of CH4, N2O and CO2 in air at well-defined depths in soils with varied water potential. Eur J Soil Sci 52:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kilian R, Hohner M, Biester H, Wallrabe-Adams HJ, Stern CR (2003) Holocene peat and lake sediment tephra record from the southernmost Chilean Andes (53-55°S). Rev Geol Chile 30:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kilian R, Biester H, Behrmann J, Baeza O, Fesq-Martin M, Hohner M, Schimpf D, Friedmann A, Mangini A (2006) Millennium-scale volcanic impact on a superhumid and pristine ecosystem. Geology 34:609–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kleinebecker T, Holzel N, Vogel A (2008) South Patagonian ombrotrophic bog vegetation reflects biogeochemical gradients at the landscape level. J Veg Sci 19:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knorr KH, Glaser B, Blodau C (2008a) Fluxes and 13C isotopic composition of dissolved carbon and pathways of methanogenesis in a fen soil exposed to experimental drought. Biogeosciences 5:1457–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knorr KH, Oosterwoud M, Blodau C (2008b) Experimental drought alters rates of soil respiration and methanogenesis but not carbon exchange in soil of a temperate fen. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1781–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.1703.1019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knorr KH, Lischeid G, Blodau C (2009) Dynamics of redox processes in a minerotrophic fen exposed to a water table manipulation. Geoderma 153:379–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kristjansson JK, Schonheit P, Thauer RK (1982) Different Ks values for hydrogen of methanogenic bacteria and sulfate reducing bacteria: an explanation for the apparent inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate. Arch Microbiol 131:278–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lansdown JM, Quay PD, King SL (1992) CH4 production via CO2 reduction in a temperate bog: a source of 13C-depleted CH4. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 56:3493–3503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lide DR, Frederikse HPR (1995) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  43. Markgraf V (1993) Paleoenvironments and paleoclimates in Tierra del Fuego and southernmost Patagonia, South America. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 102:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nakagawa F, Yoshida N, Nojiri Y, Makarov VN (2002) Production of methane from alassesin eastern Siberia: Implications from its 14C and stable isotopic compositions. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 16:14-1–14-15Google Scholar
  45. Nedwell DB, Watson A (1995) CH4 production, oxidation and emission in a U.K. ombrotrophic peat bog: influence of SO4 2− from acid rain. Soil Biol Biochem 27:893–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patel GB, Baudet C, Agnew BJ (1988) Nutritional requirements for growth of Methanothrix concilii. Can J Microbiol 34:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Penning H, Plugge CM, Galand PE, Conrad R (2005) Variation of carbon isotope fractionation in hydrogenotrophic methanogenic microbial cultures and environmental samples at different energy status. Glob Change Biol 11:2103–2113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider C, Glaser M, Kilian R, Santana A, Butorovic N, Casassa G (2003) Weather observations across the Southern Andes at 53°S. Phys Geogr 24:97–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Segers R, Kengen SWM (1998) Methane production as a function of anaerobic carbon mineralization: a process model. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1107–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Semrau JD, DiSpirito AA, Yoon S (2010) Methanotrophs and copper. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:496–531Google Scholar
  51. Shotyk W (1997) Atmospheric deposition and mass balance of major and trace elements in two oceanic peat bog profiles, northern Scotland and the Shetland Islands. Chem Geol 138:55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steinmann P, Eilrich B, Leuenberger M, Burns SJ (2008) Stable carbon isotope composition and concentrations of CO2 and CH4 in the deep catotelm of a peat bog. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:6015–6026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stern CR (2008) Holocene tephrochronology record of large explosive eruptions in the southernmost Patagonian Andes. Bull Volc 70:435–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry—chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Sundh I, Nilsson M, Granberg G, Svensson BH (1994) Depth distribution of microbial production and oxidation of methane in northern boreal peatlands. Microb Ecol 27:253–265Google Scholar
  56. Valentine DW, Holland EA, Schimel DS (1994) Ecosystem and physiological controls over methane production in northern wetlands. J Geophys Res 99:1563–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Whiticar MJ (1999) Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chem Geol 161:291–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wieder RK, Lang GE (1986) Fe, Al, Mn, and S chemistry of Sphagnum peat in 4 peatlands with different metal and sulfur input. Water Air Soil Pollut 29:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wieder RK, Lang GE, Granus VA (1985) An evaluation of wet chemical methods for quantifying sulfur fractions in freshwater wetland peat. Limnol Oceanogr 30:1109–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yavitt JB, Lang GE (1990) Methane production in contrasting wetland sites: response to organic-chemical components of peat and to sulfate reduction. Geomicrobiol J 8:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yavitt JB, Seidmann-Zager M (2006) Methanogenic conditions in northern peat soils. Geomicrobiol J 23:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Broder
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Blodau
    • 3
    • 4
  • H. Biester
    • 2
  • K. H. Knorr
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Limnological Research Station and Department of HydrologyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Geochemistry Group, Institute for GeoecologyTU BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  3. 3.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  4. 4.Hydrology Group, Institute of Landscape Ecology, FB 14 GeosciencesUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations