, Volume 122, Issue 1, pp 47–59 | Cite as

A larger investment into exudation by competitive versus conservative plants is connected to more coupled plant–microbe N cycling

  • Eva Kaštovská
  • Keith Edwards
  • Tomáš Picek
  • Hana Šantrůčková


Plant–microbe interactions actively control nitrogen (N) cycling in the ecosystem. We hypothesize that the investment into exudation and the coupling of plant–microbe N cycling will be larger in competitive plants compared to the more conservative species. Root exudation of competitive (Glyceria maxima) and conservative (Carex acuta) plants was estimated by 13C-CO2 labeling. Seasonal changes in plant, microbial, and soil soluble N pools as well as potential net microbial N transformations were determined to interconnect the C and N cycling within grassland ecosystems dominated by these species. We showed that competitive Glyceria, as compared to conservative Carex, appears to affect soil N cycling through a more direct temporal and spatial influence on soil microbes due to a larger investment into root exudation. This makes the system highly dynamic, with faster soil N cycling and pronounced seasonal N redistribution between plants and microbes. The conservative Carex, irrespective of its larger root system, invested less C to exudation. In this case, the plant–microbe relationships appear to be less-coupled in time and space with the plant N supply likely relying mainly on the relatively slow microbial mineralization of organic matter than on rhizosphere priming effect. We showed that differences in soil N cycling associated with competitive versus conservative plants are closely connected with their different investments into root exudation, which govern the coupling of plant–microbe interactions in time and space.


Plant growth strategy Exudation Grassland Labile N Microbial biomass The plant–microbe interaction 



Financial support was provided by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (526/09/1545) and by the Grant Agency of University of South Bohemia (146/2013/P). We thank Terezia Rihova and Dan Hisem for technical support and Jiri Barta, Marketa Applova, Katerina Machalova-Zemanova, Karolina Tahovska and Jiri Mach for help with laboratory sample preparations.


  1. Aerts R, Chapin FS (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. In: Fitter AH, Raffaelli DG (eds) Advances in ecological research. Elsevier Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, pp 1–67Google Scholar
  2. Bardgett RD (2002) Causes and consequences of biological diversity in soil. Zoology 105:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardgett RD, Streeter TC, Cole L, Hartley IR (2002) Linkages between soil biota, nitrogen availability, and plant nitrogen uptake in a mountain ecosystem in the Scottish Highlands. Appl Soil Ecol 19:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardgett RD, Bowman WD, Kaufmann R, Schmidt SK (2005) A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20:634–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binkley D, Giardina C (1998) Why do tree species affect soils? The Warp and Woof of tree–soil interactions. Biogeochemistry 42:89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boddy E, Hill PW, Farrar J, Jones DL (2007) Fast turnover of low molecular weight components of the dissolved organic carbon pool of temperate grassland field soils. Soil Biol Biochem 39:827–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil-nitrogen—a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman SK, Langley JA, Hart SC, Koch GW (2006) Plants actively control nitrogen cycling: uncorking the microbial bottleneck. N Phytol 169:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng WX, Johnson DW, Fu SL (2003) Rhizosphere effects on decomposition: controls of plant species, phenology, and fertilization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1418–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craine JM, Tilman D, Wedin D, Reich P, Tjoelker M, Knops J (2002) Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species. Funct Ecol 16:563–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalenberg JW, Jager G (1989) Priming effect of some organic additions to C-14-labeled soil. Soil Biol Biochem 21:443–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Deyn GB, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD (2008) Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecol Lett 11:516–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Vries FT, Bardgett RD (2012) Plant–microbial linkages and ecosystem nitrogen retention: lessons for sustainable agriculture. Front Ecol Environ 10:425–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drake JE, Darby BA, Giasson MA, Kramer MA, Phillips RP, Finzi AC (2013) Stoichiometry constrains microbial response to root exudation—insights from a model and a field experiment in a temperate forest. Biogeosciences 10:821–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisk MC, Schmidt SK, Seastedt TR (1998) Topographic patterns of above- and belowground production and nitrogen cycling in Alpine tundra. Ecology 79:2253–2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fornara DA, Bardgett R, Steinbeiss S, Zak DR, Gleixner G, Tilman D (2011) Plant effects on soil N mineralization are mediated by the composition of multiple soil organic fractions. Ecol Res 26:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friesen ML, Porter SS, Stark SC, von Wettberg EJ, Sachs JL, Martinez-Romero E (2011) Microbially mediated plant functional traits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:23–46Google Scholar
  18. Garcia FO, Rice CW (1994) Microbial biomass dynamics in tallgrass prairie. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:816–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gill RA, Jackson RB (2000) Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. N Phytol 147:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grigulis K, Lavorel S, Krainer U, Legay N, Baxendale C, Dumont M, Kastl E, Arnoldi C, Bardgett RD, Poly F, Pommier T, Schloter M, Tappeiner U, Bahn M, Clement JC (2013) Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services. J Ecol 101:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for existing of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartmann A, Schmid M, van Tuinen D, Berg G (2009) Plant-driven selection of microbes. Plant Soil 321:235–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hobbie SE (1992) Effects of plant-species on nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 7:336–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hogberg MN, Chen Y, Hogberg P (2007) Gross nitrogen mineralisation and fungi-to-bacteria ratios are negatively correlated in boreal forests. Biol Fertil Soils 44:363–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jaeger CH, Monson RK, Fisk MC, Schmidt SK (1999) Seasonal partitioning of nitrogen by plants and soil microorganisms in an alpine ecosystem. Ecology 80:1883–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenkinson DS (1990) The turnover of organic carbon and nitrogen in soil. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 329:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones DL, Hodge A, Kuzyakov Y (2004) Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition. N Phytol 163:459–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kastovska E, Santruckova H (2011) Comparison of uptake of different N forms by soil microorganisms and two wet-grassland plants: a pot study. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1285–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kastovska E, Picek T, Barta J, Mach J, Cajthaml T, Edwards K (2012) Nutrient addition retards decomposition and C immobilization in two wet grasslands. Hydrobiologia 692:67–81Google Scholar
  30. Knops JMH, Bradley KL, Wedin DA (2002) Mechanisms of plant species impacts on ecosystem nitrogen cycling. Ecol Lett 5:454–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuzyakov Y, Xu XL (2013) Competition between roots and microorganisms for nitrogen: mechanisms and ecological relevance. N Phytol 198:656–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lipson DA, Schmidt SK (2004) Seasonal changes in an alpine soil bacterial community in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:2867–2879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lipson DA, Schmidt SK, Monson RK (1999) Links between microbial population dynamics and nitrogen availability in an alpine ecosystem. Ecology 80:1623–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Orwin KH, Buckland SM, Johnson D, Turner BL, Smart S, Oakley S, Bardgett RD (2010) Linkages of plant traits to soil properties and the functioning of temperate grassland. J Ecol 98:1074–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paul EA, Juma NG (1981) Mineralization and immobilization of soil N by microorganisms. In: Clark CR, Rosswall T (eds) Terrestrial nitrogen cycles, processes, ecosystem, strategies and management impacts. Swedish Natural Science Research Council, Stockholm, pp 179–195Google Scholar
  36. Personeni E, Loiseau P (2004) How does the nature of living and dead roots affect the residence time of carbon in the root litter continuum? Plant Soil 267:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Personeni E, Loiseau P (2005) Species strategy and N fluxes in grassland soil—a question of root litter quality or rhizosphere activity? Eur J Agron 22:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Personeni E, Luscher A, Loiseau P (2005) Rhizosphere activity, grass species and N availability effects on the soil C and N cycles. Soil Biol Biochem 37:819–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt SK, Lipson DA (2004) Microbial growth under the snow: implications for nutrient and allelochemical availability in temperate soils. Plant Soil 259:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmidt SK, Costello EK, Nemergut DR, Cleveland CC, Reed SC, Weintraub MN, Meyer AF, Martin AM (2007) Biogeochemical consequences of rapid microbial turnover and seasonal succession in soil. Ecology 88:1379–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scott NA, Binkley D (1997) Foliage litter quality and annual net N mineralization: comparison across North American forest sites. Oecologia 111:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singh JS, Raghubanshi AS, Singh RS, Srivastava SC (1989) Microbial biomass acts as a source of plant nutrients in dry tropical forest and savanna. Nature 338:499–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strickland MS, Rousk J (2010) Considering fungal:bacterial dominance in soils—methods, controls, and ecosystem implications. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1385–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tilman D (1990) Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, p 484Google Scholar
  45. Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN, Setala H, van der Putten WH, Wall DH (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304:1629–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wedin DA, Tilman D (1990) Species effect on nitrogen cycling—a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84:433–441Google Scholar
  47. Zak DR, Groffman PM, Pregitzer KS, Christensen S, Tiedje JM (1990) The vernal dam—plant microbe competition for nitrogen in northern hardwood forests. Ecology 71:651–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Kaštovská
    • 1
  • Keith Edwards
    • 1
  • Tomáš Picek
    • 1
  • Hana Šantrůčková
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecosystem Biology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations