Biogeochemistry

, Volume 121, Issue 3, pp 455–470 | Cite as

Transport of oxygen in soil pore-water systems: implications for modeling emissions of carbon dioxide and methane from peatlands

  • Zhaosheng Fan
  • Jason C. Neff
  • Mark P. Waldrop
  • Ashley P. Ballantyne
  • Merritt R. Turetsky
Article

Abstract

Peatlands store vast amounts of soil carbon and are significant sources of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions. The traditional approach in biogeochemical model simulations of peatland emissions is to simply divide the soil domain into an aerobic zone above and an anaerobic zone below the water table (WT) and then calculate CO2 and CH4 emissions based on the assumed properties of these two discrete zones. However, there are major potential drawbacks associated with the traditional WT-based approach, because aerobic or anaerobic environments are ultimately determined by oxygen (O2) concentration rather than water content directly. Variations in O2 content above and below the WT can be large and thus may play an important role in partitioning of carbon fluxes between CO2 and CH4. In this paper, we propose an oxygen-based approach, which simulates the vertical and radial components of O2 movement and consumption through the soil aerobic and anaerobic environments. We then use both our oxygen-based and the traditional WT-based approaches to simulate CO2 and CH4 emissions from an Alaskan fen peatland. The results of model calibration and validation suggest that our physically realistic approach (i.e., oxygen-based approach) cause less biases on the simulated flux of CO2 and CH4. The results of model simulations also suggest that the traditional WT-based approach might substantially under-estimate CH4 emissions and over-estimate CO2 emissions from the fen due to the presence of anaerobic zones in unsaturated soil. Our oxygen-based approach can be easily incorporated into existing ecosystem or earth system models but will require additional validation with more extensive field observations to be implemented within biogeochemical models to improve simulations of soil C fluxes at regional or global scale.

Keywords

Water table Model Oxygen Microbial Habitat Warming Aerobic Anaerobic 

References

  1. Allison SD, Wallenstein MD, Bradford MA (2010) Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology. Nat Geosci 3:336–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arah JRM, Vinten AJA (1995) Simplified models of anoxia and denitrification in aggregated and simple-structured soils. Eur J Soil Sci 46:507–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aselman I, Crutzen PJ (1989) Global distribution of natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emissions. J Atmos Chem 8:307–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batjes NH (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boggie R (1977) Water-table depth and oxygen content of deep peat in relation to root growth of pinus contorta. Plant Soil 48:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohn TJ, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Systematic biases in large-scale estimate of wetland methane emissions arising from water table formulations. Geophys Res Lett. doi:10.1029/2010GL045450 Google Scholar
  7. Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Dewey B, Weltzin JF, Updegraff K (2008) Rapid carbon responseof peatlands to climate change. Ecology 89:3041–3048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caron J, Nkongolo NV (2003) Assessing gas diffusion coefficients in growing media from in situ water flow and storage measurements. Vadose Zone J 3:300–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chivers MR, Turetsky MR, Waddington JM, Harden JW, McGuire AD (2009) Effects of experimental water table and temperature manipulation on ecosystem CO2 fluxes in an Alaska rich fen. Ecosystems 12:1329–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deppe M, Knorr KH, McKnight DM, Blodau C (2010) Effects of short-term drying and irrigation on CO2 and CH4 production and emission from mesocosms of a northern bog and an alpine fen. Biogeochemistry 100:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dimitrov DD, Grant RF, Lafleur PM, Humphreys ER (2010) Modeling the effects of hydrology on ecosystem respiration at Mer Bleue bog. J Geophys Res. doi:10.1029/2010JG001312 Google Scholar
  13. Elberling B, Askaer L, Jorgensen CJ, Joensen HP, Kuhl M, Glud RN, Lauritsen FR (2011) Linking soil O2, CO2, and CH4 concentrations in a wetland soil: implications for CO2 and CH4 fluxes. Environ Sci Technol 45:3393–3399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Estop-Aragones C, Knorr KH, Blodau C (2012) Controls on in situ oxygen and dissolved inorganic carbon dynamics in peats of a temperate fen. J Geophys Res. doi:10.1029/2011JG001888 Google Scholar
  15. Estop-Aragones C, Knorr KH, Blodau C (2013) Belowground in situ redox dynamics and methanogenesis recovery in a degraded fen during dry-wet cycles and flooding. Biogeosciences 10:421–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fan Z, Neff JC, Harden JW, Wickland KP (2008) Boreal soil carbon dynamics under a changling climate: a model inverseion approach. J Geophys Res. doi:10.1029/2008JG000723 Google Scholar
  17. Fan Z, Neff JC, Harden JW et al (2011) Water and heat transport in boreal soils: implications for soil response to climate change. Sci Total Environ 409:1836–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frolking S, Routlet NT, Moore TR, Lafleur PM, Bubier JL, Crill PM (2002) Modeling seasonal to annual carbon balance of Mer Bleue Bog. Global Biogeochem Cycles, Ontario. doi:10.1029/2001GB001457 Google Scholar
  19. Frolking S, Routlet NT, Tuittila E, Bubier JL, Quillet A, Talbot J, Richard PJH (2010) A new model of Holocene peatland net primary production, decomposition, water balance, and peat accumulation. Earth Syst Dyn 1:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gorham E (1991) Northern peatlands: role in the carbon-cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol Appl 1:182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant RF, Routlet NT (2002) Methane efflux from boreal wetlands: theory and testing of the ecosystem model Ecosys with chamber and tower flux measurements. Global Biogeochem Cycles. doi:10.1029/2001GB001702 Google Scholar
  22. Hillel D (1998) Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  23. Hobbie SE, Schimel JP, Trumbore SE, Randerson JR (2000) Controls over carbon storage and turnover in high-latitude soils. Global Change Bio 6:196–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingram HAP (1978) Soil layers in mires: function and terminology. Soil Sci 29:224–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Kane ES, Chivers MR, Turetsky MR et al (2013) Response of anaerobic carbon cycling to water table manipulation in an Alaskan rich fen. Soil Bio Biochem 58:50–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kestin J, Solokov M, Wakeham WA (1978) Viscosity of liquid water in the range - 8°C to 150°C. J Phys Chem Ref Data 7:941–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knorr KH, Oosterwoud M, Blodau C (2008) Experimental drought alters rates of soil respiration and methanogenesis but not carbon exchange in soil of a temperate fen. Soil Bio Biochem 40:1781–1791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lal R (2005) Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manag 220:242–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langeveld CA, Leffelaar PA (2002) Modelling belowground processes to explain field-scale emissions of nitrous oxide. Ecol Model 149:97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawrence CR, Neff JC, Schimel JP (2009) Does adding microbial mechanisms of decomposition improve soil organic matter models? A comparison of four models using data from a pulsed rewetting experiment. Soil Bio Biochem 41:1923–1934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leffelaar PA (1979) Simulaiton of partial anaerobiosis in a model osil in respect to denitrification. Soil Sci 128:110–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Letts MG, Routlet NT, Comer NT, Skarupa MR, Verseghy DL (2000) Parameterization of peatland and hydraulic properties for the Canadian land surface scheme. Atmos Ocean 38:141–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li C, Aber J, Stange F, Butterbach-Bahl K, Papen H (2000) A process-oriented model of N2O and NO emissions from forest soils: 1. Model development. J Geophys Res 105:4369–4384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Limpens J, Berendse F, Blodau C et al (2008) Peatlands and the carbon cycle: from local processes to global implications-a synthesis. Biogeosciences 5:1475–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manies KL, Harden JW (2011) Soil data from different-age Picea mariana stands near Delta Junction. U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  37. Matthews E, Fung I (1987) Methane emissions from natural wetlands: global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of source. Global Biogeochem Cycles 1:61–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Millington RJ, Quirk JM (1961) Permeability of porous solids. Trans Faraday Soc 57:1200–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moldrup P, Olesen T, Rolston DE, Yamaguchi T (1997) Modeling diffusion and reaction in soils: vII. Predicting gas and ion diffusivity in undisturbed sieved soils. Soil Sci 162:632–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moles CG, Mendes P, Banga JR (2003) Parameter estimation in biochemical pathways: a comparison of global optimization methods. Genome Res 13:2467–2474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morris PJ, Waddington JM (2011) Groundwater residence time distributions in peatlands: Implications for peat decomposition and accumulation. Water Resour Res doi 47(2)Google Scholar
  42. Mualem Y (1976) A new model predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nielsen LP, Risgaard-Petersen N, Fossing H, Christensen PB, Sayama M (2010) Electric currents couple spatially seperated biogeochemical processes in marine sediment. Nature 463:1071–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nisbet EG, Dlugokencky EJ, Bousquet P (2014) Methane on the rise—again. Science 343:493–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Penman HL (1940) Gas and vapor movements in soil: the diffusion of vapors through porous solids. J Agric Sci 30:437–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pingintha N, Leclerc MY, Beasley JP Jr, Zhang G, Senthong C (2010) Assessment of the soil CO2 gradient method for soil CO2 efflux measurements: comparision of six models in the calculation of the relative gas diffusion coefficient. Tellus 62B:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramaswamy V, Chanin M-L, Angell J et al (2001) Stratospheric temperature trends: observations and model simulations. Rev Geophys 39:71–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reid RC, Prausnitz JM, Sherwood TK (1977) The properties of gases and liquids, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Runarsson TP, Yao X (2000) Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary opitimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 4:284–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sayama M, Risgaard-Petersen N, Nielsen LP, Fossing H, Christensen PB (2005) Impact of bacterial NO3 transport on sediment biogeochemistry. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7375–7577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schurgers G, Dorsch P, Bakken L, Leffelaar P, Haugen LE (2006) Modelling soil anaerobiosis from water retention characteristics and soil respiration. Soil Bio Biochem 38:2637–2644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schuur EAG, Trumbore SE (2006) Partitioning sources of soil respiration in boreal black spruce forest using radiocarbon. Global Change Biol 12:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sexstone AJ, Revsbech NP, Parkin TB, Tiedje JM (1984) Direct measurement of oxygen profiles and denitrification rates in soil aggregates. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:645–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Silins U, Rothwell RL (1999) Spatial patterns of aerobic limit depth and oxygen diffusion rate at two peatlands drained for forestry in Alberta. Can J For Res 29:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith KA (1980) A model of the extent of anaerobic zones in aggregated soils, and its potential application to estimates of denitrification. Soil Sci 31:263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tarnocai C, Canadell JG, Schurr EAG, Kuhry P, Mazhitova G, Zimov S (2009) Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region. Global Biogeochem Cycles. doi:10.1029/2008GB003327 Google Scholar
  57. Thornton PE, Rosenbloom NA (2005) Ecosystem model spin-up: estimating steady state conditions in a coupled terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycle model. Ecol Model 189:25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tiedje JM, Sexstone AJ, Parkin TB, Revsbech NP, Shelton DR (1984) Anaerobic process in soil. Plant Soil 76:197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Treseder KK, Balser TC, Bradford MA et al (2012) Integrating microbial ecology into ecosystem models: challenges and priorities. Biogeochemistry 109:7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turetsky MR, Treat CC, Waldrop MP, Waddington JM, Harden JW, McGuire AD (2008) Short-term response of methane fluxes and methanogen activity to water table and soil warming manipulations in an Alaskan peatland. J Geophys Res. doi:10.1029/2007JG000496 Google Scholar
  61. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walter BP, Heimann M (2000) A process-based, climate-sensitive model to derive methane emissions from natural wetlands: application to five wetland sites, sensitivity to model parameters, and climate. Global Biogeochem Cycles 14:745–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wania R, Ross I, Prentice IC (2010) Implementation and evaluation of a new methane model within a dynamic global vegetation model: lPJ-WHyMe v1.3.1. Geosci Model Dev 3:565–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wu Y, Blodau C (2013) PEATBOG: a biogeochemical model for analyzing coupled carbon and nitrogen dynamics in northern peatlands. Geosci Model Dev 6:1173–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wyatt KH, Turetsky MR, Rober AR, Giroldo D, Kane ES, Stevenson RJ (2012) Contributions of algae to GPP and DOC production in an Alaskan fen: effects of historical water table manipulations on ecosystem responses to a natural flood. Oecologia 169:821–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhuang Q, Melillo JM, Kicklighter DW et al (2004) Methane fluxes between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere at northern high latitudes during the past century: a retrospective analysis with a process-based chemistry model. Global Biogeochem Cycles. doi:10.1029/2004GB002239 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhaosheng Fan
    • 1
  • Jason C. Neff
    • 2
  • Mark P. Waldrop
    • 3
  • Ashley P. Ballantyne
    • 4
  • Merritt R. Turetsky
    • 5
  1. 1.Biosciences DivisionArgonne National LaboratoryArgonneUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  3. 3.USGSMenlo ParkUSA
  4. 4.Department of Ecosystem and Conservation SciencesUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations