, Volume 118, Issue 1–3, pp 195–204 | Cite as

Synergistic soil response to nitrogen plus phosphorus fertilization in hardwood forests

  • Melany C. FiskEmail author
  • Tera J. Ratliff
  • Shinjini Goswami
  • Ruth D. Yanai


Plant and microbial processes exert control on the stoichiometry of available nutrients, potentially influencing forest ecosystem responses to nitrogen enrichment and other perturbations that alter resource availability. We tested whether an excess of one nutrient influenced the available pool of another, to learn the net outcome of various feedbacks on mineralization and uptake processes. We examined nitrogen and phosphorus availability (assayed with buried ion-exchange resin strips) in the first year of fertilizing northern hardwood forests with 30 kg/ha N, 10 kg/ha P, or N and P together. Fertilizing with a single nutrient raised the availability of the added nutrient and had no detectable effect on availability of the other nutrient. However, resin-available N was raised substantially more by adding N+P than it was by adding N alone. This effect of N+P must be the result of either reduced biotic uptake of N or increased mineralization of N, and suggests that N loss following forest disturbances will be enhanced in cases where the availability of both N and P are increased. That P interacts with N to enhance N availability, by whatever mechanism, could help explain observations of N and P co-limitation in ecosystems and calls attention to the need to carefully elucidate mechanisms underlying co-limitation of forest productivity.


Co-limitation Fertilization Nitrogen Northern hardwood forest Nutrient availability Phosphorus 



We are indebted to Matt Vadeboncoeur and Steve Hamburg for field site selection and setup, and we thank Russell Auwae, Kikang Bae, and Craig See for outstanding work in the field. We also thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to improve this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from NSF to Fisk and Yanai and this manuscript is a contribution of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study. Hubbard Brook is part of the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) network, which is supported by the National Science Foundation. The Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, USA.


  1. Aber JD, Goodale CL, Ollinger SV, Smith ML, Magill AH, Martin ME, Hallett RA, Stoddard JL (2003) Is nitrogen deposition altering the nitrogen status of northeastern forests? Bioscience 53:375–389Google Scholar
  2. Ågren GI, Wetterstedt JAM, Billberger MFK (2012) Nutrient limitation on terrestrial plant growth—modeling the interaction between nitrogen and phosphorus. New Phytol 194:953–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37:937–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison SD, Weintraub MN, Gartner TB, Waldrop MP (2011) Evolutionary-economic principles as regulators of soils enzyme production and ecosystem function. In: Shukla G, Varma A (eds) Soil biology, vol 22., Soil enzymologySpringer, Berlin, pp 230–243Google Scholar
  5. Bloom AJ, Chapin FS III, Mooney HA (1985) Resource limitation in plants—an economic analogy. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16:363–392Google Scholar
  6. Bohlen PJ, Groffman PM, Driscoll CT, Fahey TJ, Siccama TG (2001) Plant–soil–microbial interactions in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 82:965–978Google Scholar
  7. Cleveland CC, Lipzin D (2007) C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85:235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davidson EA, Howarth RW (2007) Environmental science: nutrients in synergy. Nature 449:1000–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Ngai JT, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Smith JE (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fahey TJ, Battles JJ, Wilson GF (1998) Response of early successional northern hardwood forests to changes in nutrient availability. Ecol Monogr 68:533–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finzi AC, Austin AT, Cleland EE, Frey SD, Houlton BZ, Wallenstein MD (2011) Responses and feedbacks of coupled biogeochemical cycles to climate change: examples from terrestrial ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 9:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fiorentino I, Fahey TJ, Groffman PM, Driscoll CT, Eagar C, Siccama TG (2003) Initial responses of phosphorus biogeochemistry to calcium addition in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Can J For Res 33:1864–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisk MC, Fahey TJ (1990) Nitrification potentials in organic horizons following clear felling of northern hardwood forests. Soil Biol Biochem 22:277–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisk MC, Fahey TJ (2001) Microbial biomass and nitrogen cycling response to fertilization and litter removal in young northern hardwood forests. Biogeochemistry 53:201–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flanagan J, VanCleve K (1983) Nutrient cycling in relation to decomposition and organic matter quality in taiga ecosystems. Can J For Res 13:795–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groffman PM, Hardy JP, Nolan S, Fitzhugh RD, Driscoll CT, Fahey TJ (1999) Snow depth, soil frost and nutrient loss in a northern hardwood forest. Hydrol Process 13:2275–2286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harpole WS, Ngai JT, Cleland EE, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Bracken MES, Elser JJ, Gruner DS, Hillebrand H, Shurin JB, Smith JE (2011) Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities. Ecol Lett 14:852–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart SC, Binkley D, Perry DA (1997) Influence of red alder on soil nitrogen transformations in two conifer forests of contrasting productivity. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1111–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Houlton BZ, Driscoll CT, Fahey TJ, Likens GE, Groffman PM, Bernhardt ES, Buso DC (2003) Nitrogen dynamics in ice storm-damaged forest ecosystems: implications for nitrogen limitation theory. Ecosystems 6:431–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leak WB (1991) Secondary forest succession in New Hampshire, USA. For Ecol Manage 43:69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lovett GM, Christenson LM, Groffman PM, Jones CC, Hart JE, Mitchell MJ (2002) Insect defoliation and nitrogen cycling in forests. Bioscience 52:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marklein AR, Houlton BZ (2012) Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 193:696–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGill WB, Cole CV (1981) Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S, and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma 26:267–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Minick KJ, Fisk MC, Groffman PG (2011) Calcium and phosphorus interact to reduce mid-growing season net nitrogen mineralization potential in organic horizons in a northern hardwood forest. Soil Biol Biochem 42:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitchell MJ, Driscoll CT, Kahl JA, Likens GE, Murdoch PS, Pardo LH (1996) Climatic control of nitrate loss from forested watersheds in the northeastern United States. Environ Sci Technol 30:2609–2612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naples BK, Fisk MC (2010) Belowground insights into nutrient limitation in northern hardwood forests. Biogeochemistry 97:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olander LP, Vitousek PM (2000) Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry 49:175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rastetter EB, Yanai RD, Thomas RQ, Vadeboncoeur MA, Fahey TJ, Fisk MC, Kwiatkowski BL, Hamburg SP (2013) Recovery from disturbance requires resynchronization of ecosystem nutrient cycles. Ecol Appl 23:621–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saito MA, Goepfert TJ, Ritt JT (2008) Some thoughts on the concept of colimitation: three definitions and the importance of bioavailability. Lim Ocean 53:276–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schimel JP, Weintraub MN (2003) The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Treseder KK, Vitousek PM (2001) Effects of soil nutrient availability on investment in acquisition of N and P in Hawaiian rain forests. Ecology 82:946–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vadeboncoeur MA (2010) Meta-analysis of fertilization experiments indicates multiple limiting nutrients in northeastern deciduous forests. Can J For Res 40:1766–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vitousek PM (2004) Nutrient cycling and limitation: Hawai’i as a model system. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  35. Wood T, Bormann FH, Voigt GK (1984) Phosphorus cycling in a northern hardwood forest: biological and chemical control. Science 223:391–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yanai RD (1998) The effect of whole-tree harvest on phosphorus cycling in a northern hardwood forest. For Ecol Manage 104:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melany C. Fisk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tera J. Ratliff
    • 1
  • Shinjini Goswami
    • 1
  • Ruth D. Yanai
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyMiami UniversityOxfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Forest and Natural Resource ManagementSUNY College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations