, Volume 112, Issue 1–3, pp 613–623

Fate of methane bubbles released by pockmarks in Lake Constance

  • Ingeborg Bussmann
  • Ellen Damm
  • Michael Schlüter
  • Martin Wessels


In the eastern part of Lake Constance, the second largest pre-alpine lake in Europe, about five hundred pockmarks (morphological depressions on the lake floor) were recently discovered of which ~40 % release methane bubbles. The carbon isotopic composition of the escaping gas indicated that the methane is of biogenic origin. In our study, we investigated the fate of the released methane bubbles, i.e., the dissolution, oxidation or transport of the bubbles to the surface. At a littoral pockmark site (PM12, 12 m water depth) and a profundal pockmark (PM80, 80 m water depth), we analysed the dissolved methane concentrations and the methane isotopic carbon signature in the water column. At PM80, higher methane concentrations (up to 1,523 nM), compared to the control site and the surface waters (225 ± 72 nM), were recorded only on some occasions and only in the bottom water, despite the fact that the released bubbles were dissolving within the hypolimnion based on bubble modeling. The isotope data suggest that most of the dissolved methane is oxidized below 40 m water depth. The isotopic signature of the methane in the surface water at PM80, however, differed from that of the methane in the hypolimnion; therefore, the surface methane at this profundal site is most likely an export product from the littoral zone. Assuming an initial bubble diameter of 5 mm, we calculated that these small bubbles would reach the surface, but approximately 96 % of the methane would have dissolved from the bubble into the hypolimnion. At PM12, we observed higher concentrations of dissolved methane (312 ± 52 nM) with no significant differences between seasons or between control sites versus pockmark site. In the shallow water, divers estimated the bubble size to be 10–15 mm, which from a release depth of 12 m would barely dissolved into the water column. The isotopic signature also indicated that there had been almost no methane oxidation in the shallow water column. Thus, the water depth of bubble release as well as the initial bubble size determine whether the methane enters the atmosphere largely unhindered (shallow site) or if the released methane is incorporated into the profundal water column.


Lake Constance Methane Methane oxidation Ebullition Gas bubble Dissolution 


  1. Baraza J, Ercilla G (1996) Gas-charged sediments and large pockmark-like features on the Gulf of Cadiz slope (SW Spain). Mar Pet Geol 13:253–261Google Scholar
  2. Bastviken D, Ejlertsson J, Sundh I, Tranvik L (2002) Measurement of methane oxidation in lakes: a comparison of methods. Environ Sci Technol 36:3354–3361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastviken D, Cole J, Pace M, Tranvik L (2004) Methane emissions from lakes: dependence of lake characteristics, two regional assessments, and a global estimate. Glob Biogeochem Cycl 18: GB4009Google Scholar
  4. Bastviken D, Cole JJ, Pace ML, Van de Bogert MC (2008) Fates of methane from different lake habitats: connecting whole-lake budgets and CH4 emissions. J Geophys Res 113: G02024Google Scholar
  5. Bastviken D, Tranvik LJ, Downing JA, Crill PM, Enrich-Prast A (2011) Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental carbon sink. Science 331:50–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bäuerle E, Ollinger D, Ilmberger J (1998) Some meteorological, hydrological, and hydrodynamical aspects of Upper Lake Constance. Arch Hydrobiol Spec Issues Advanc Limnol 53:31–83Google Scholar
  7. Boudreau BP, Gardiner BS, Johnson BD (2001) Rate of growth of isolated bubbles in sediments with a diagenetic source of methane. Limnol Oceanogr 46:616–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bussmann I (2005) Methane release through suspension of littoral sediment. Biogeochemistry 74:283–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bussmann I, Schlömer S, Schlüter M, Wessels M (2011) Active pockmarks in a large lake (Lake Constance, Germany): effects on methane distribution and turnover in the sediment. Limnol Oceanogr 56:379–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cathles LM, Su Z, Chen D (2010) The physics of gas chimney and pockmark formation, with implications for assessment of seafloor hazards and gas sequestration. Mar Pet Geol 27:82–91Google Scholar
  11. Christodoulou D, Papatheodorou G, Ferentino G, Masson M (2003) The origin of two pockmark fields in Patras and Corinth Gulfs, Greece. Geo-Mar Lett 23:194–199Google Scholar
  12. Coleman DD, Risatti JB, Schoell M (1981) Fractionation of carbon and hydrogen isotopes by methane-oxidizing bacteria. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 45:1033–1037Google Scholar
  13. Craig H (1957) Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass-spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 12:133–149Google Scholar
  14. DelSontro T, McGinnis DF, Sobek S, Ostrovsky I, Wehrli B (2010) Extreme methane emissions from a Swiss hydropower reservoir: contribution from bubbling sediments. Environ Sci Technol 44:2419–2425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eder M, Kobus H, Helmig R (2008) Three-dimensional modelling of hydrodynamics in Lake Constance. Wasserwirtschaft 98:16–21Google Scholar
  16. Etiope G (2004) New directions: GEM—geologic emissions of methane, the missing source in the atmospheric methane budget. Atmos Environ 38:3099–3100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilfedder BS, Petri M, Wessels M, Biester H (2011) Bromine species fluxes from Lake Constance’s catchment, and a preliminary lake mass balance. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:3385–33401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greinert J, McGinnis DF (2009) Single bubble dissolution model: the graphical user interface SiBu-GUI. Environ Model Software 24:1012–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrington PK (1985) Formation of pockmarks by porewater escape. Geo-Mar Lett 5:193–197Google Scholar
  20. Hofmann H, Federwisch L, Peeters F (2010) Wave-induced release of methane: littoral zones as a source of methane in lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 55:1990–2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hovland M, Gardner JV, Judd AG (2002) The significance of pockmarks to understanding fluid flow processes and geohazards. Geofluids 2:127–136Google Scholar
  22. IGKB (2004) Der Bodensee: Zustand - Fakten - Perspektiven. Internationale Gewässerschutzkommission, BodenseeGoogle Scholar
  23. IGKB (2009) BUS—Bodensee-Untersuchung-Seeboden. Internationale Gewässerschutzkommission, BodenseeGoogle Scholar
  24. IPCC, Denman KL, Brasseur G, Chidthaisong A, Ciais P, Cox PM, Dickinson RE, Hauglustaine D, Heinze C, Holland E, Jacob D, Lohmann U, Ramachandran S, Dias PLdS, Wofsy SC, Zhang X (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Judd AG, Hovland M (2007) Seabed fluid flow: the impact of geology, biology, and the marine environment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Kankaala P, Taipale S, Nykänen H, Jones RI (2007) Oxidation, efflux, and isotopic fractionation of methane during autumnal turnover in a polyhumic, boreal lake. J Geophys Res 112:G02033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McGinnis DF, Greinert J, Artemov Y, Beaubien SE, Wuest A (2006) Fate of rising methane bubbles in stratified waters: how much methane reaches the atmosphere? J Geophys Res (C Oceans) 111:C09007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murase J, Sakai Y, Kametani A, Sugimoto A (2005) Dynamics of methane in mesotrophic Lake Biwa. Jpn Ecol Res 20:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ostrovsky I, McGinnis DF, Lapidus L, Eckert W (2008) Quantifying gas ebullition with echosounder: the role of methane transport by bubbles in a medium-sized lake. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 6:105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paull CK, Ussler III W, Borowski WS, Spiess FN (1995) Methane-rich plumes on the Carolina continental rise: associations with gas hydrates. Geology 23:89–92Google Scholar
  31. Paull C, Ussler III W, Maher N, Greene HG, Rehder G, Lorenson T, Lee H (2002) Pockmarks off Big Sur, California. Mar Geol 181:323–335Google Scholar
  32. Sansone FJ, Holmes ME, Popp BN (1999) Methane stable isotopic ratios and concentrations as indicators of methane dynamics in estuaries. Glob Biogeochem Cycl 13:463–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmid M, De Batist M, Granin N, Kapitanov V, McGinnis D, Mizandrontsev I, Obzhirov A, Wueest A (2007) Sources and sinks of methane in Lake Baikal: a synthesis of measurements and modeling. Limnol Oceanogr 52:1824–1837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt U, Conrad R (1993) Hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane dynamics in Lake Constance. Limnol Oceanogr 38:1214–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schulz M, Faber E, Hollerbach A, Schröder HG, Güde H (2001) The methane cycle in the epilimnion of Lake Constance. Arch Hydrobiol 151:157–176Google Scholar
  36. Soter S (1999) Macroscopic seismic anomalies and submarine pockmarks in the Corinth-Patras rift, Greece. Tectonophysics 308:275–290Google Scholar
  37. Thebrath B, Rothfuss F, Whiticar MJ, Conrad R (1993) Methane production in littoral sediment of Lake Constance. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 102:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. von Deimling JS, Greinert J, Chapman NR, Rabbel W, Linke P (2010) Acoustic imaging of natural gas seepage in the North Sea: sensing bubbles controlled by variable currents. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 8:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wanninkhof R (1992) Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean. J Geophys Res 97:7373–7382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wessels M (1995) Bodensee-Sedimente als Abbild von Umweltänderungen im Spät- und Post-glazial. Göttinger Arb Geol Paläont 66:1–105Google Scholar
  41. Wessels M, Bussmann I, Schloemer S, Schlüter M, Böder V (2010) Distribution, morphology, and formation of pockmarks in Lake Constance, Germany. Limnol Oceanogr 55:2623–2633Google Scholar
  42. Whiticar MJ (2002) Diagenetic relationships of methanogenesis, nutrients, acoustic turbidity, pockmarks and freshwater seepages in Eckernförde Bay. Mar Geol 182:29–53Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingeborg Bussmann
    • 1
  • Ellen Damm
    • 2
  • Michael Schlüter
    • 2
  • Martin Wessels
    • 3
  1. 1.Alfred Wegener Institute, Marine Station HelgolandHelgolandGermany
  2. 2.Department of Marine GeochemistryAlfred Wegener InstituteBremerhavenGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Lake ResearchLangenargenGermany

Personalised recommendations