Control of soil pH on turnover of belowground organic matter in subalpine grassland
- 652 Downloads
Grasslands store substantial amounts of carbon in the form of organic matter in soil and roots. At high latitudes and elevation, turnover of these materials is slow due to various interacting biotic and abiotic constraints. Reliable estimates on the future of belowground carbon storage in cold grassland soils thus require quantitative understanding of these factors. We studied carbon turnover of roots, labile coarse particulate organic matter (cPOM) and older non-cPOM along a natural pH gradient (3.9–5.9) in a subalpine grassland by utilizing soil fractionation and radiocarbon dating. Soil carbon stocks and root biomass, turnover, and decomposability did not scale with soil pH whereas mean residence times of both soil organic matter fractions significantly increased with declining pH. The effect was twice as strong for non-cPOM, which was also stronger enriched in 15N at low pH. Considering roots as important precursors for cPOM, the weaker soil pH effect on cPOM turnover may have been driven by comparably high root pH values. At pH < 5, long non-cPOM mean residence times were probably related to pH dependent changes in substrate availability. Differences in turnover along the pH gradient were not reflected in soil carbon stocks because aboveground productivity was lower under acidic conditions and, in turn, higher inputs from aboveground plant residues compensated for faster soil carbon turnover at less acidic pH. In summary, the study provides evidence for a strong and differential regulatory role of pH on the turnover of soil organic matter that needs consideration in studies aiming to quantify effects of changing environmental conditions on belowground carbon storage.
KeywordsRadiocarbon Soil fractionation Roots XRD POM Turnover 15N
We thank Robin Giger for soil fractionation and elemental analysis and Susanne Müller for assisting in root incubation experiments. Karen Budge helped to improve the language. Diane Bürge-Weirich and Johanna Rauwolf performed XRF measurements and Christian Mavris helped with XRD. We thank two anonymous reviewers and Phil Sollins for constructive comments on the manuscript.
- FAL (1998) Methodenbuch für Boden-, Pflanzen- und Lysimeterwasseruntersuchungen. Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Agrarökologie und Landbau. Schriftenreihe der FAL, 27, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Harkness DD, Harrison AF, Bacon PJ (1986) The temporal distribution of bomb C-14 in a forest soil. Radiocarbon 28:328–337Google Scholar
- Levin I, Kromer B (2004) The tropospheric (CO2)–C-14 level in mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (1959–2003). Radiocarbon 46:1261–1272Google Scholar
- Scheel T, Dorfler C, Kalbitz K (2007) Precipitation of dissolved organic matter by aluminum stabilizes carbon in acidic forest soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:64–74Google Scholar
- Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL, Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop MP, Wallenstein MD, Zak DR, Zeglin LH (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:1252–1264Google Scholar
- Sjögersten-Turner S, Alewell C, Cécillon L, Hagedorn F, Jandl R, Leifeld J, Martinsen V, Schindlbacher A, Sebastià M-T, Van Miegroet H (2011) Mountain soils in a changing climate – vulnerability of carbon stocks and ecosystem feedbacks. In: Jandl R, Rodeghiero M, Olsson M (eds) Soil carbon in sensitive European ecosystems. From science to land management. Wiley-Blackwell, pp 118–148Google Scholar
- Stuiver M, Polach HA (1977) Reporting of C-14 data—discussion. Radiocarbon 19:355–363Google Scholar
- Stuiver M, Reimer PJ, Braziunas TF (1998) High-precision radiocarbon age calibration for terrestrial and marine samples. Radiocarbon 40:1127–1151Google Scholar